The Use of the Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet-Lymphocyte Ratio in Predicting Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Mortality.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Heart, Lung and Circulation Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1016/j.hlc.2024.07.006
Sachin Nair, Francis J Ha, Arul Baradi, Shane Nanayakkara, Lucy Soden, David Jin, Robert Whitbourn, Andrew Wilson, Sonny Palmer
{"title":"The Use of the Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet-Lymphocyte Ratio in Predicting Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Mortality.","authors":"Sachin Nair, Francis J Ha, Arul Baradi, Shane Nanayakkara, Lucy Soden, David Jin, Robert Whitbourn, Andrew Wilson, Sonny Palmer","doi":"10.1016/j.hlc.2024.07.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are simple biomarkers that reflect systemic inflammation and are associated with adverse cardiovascular disease outcomes. The utility of NLR and PLR for risk prediction following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is not clear.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We retrospectively analysed a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent TAVI at a tertiary hospital from 2009 to 2022. Baseline demographics, NLR, PLR and Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality (STS-PROM) scores were obtained. The 30-day and 1-year survival rates were analysed using a logistic regression model while overall survival was analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Predictors of survival were calculated using a Cox-hazards regression model and presented as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 367 patients were included in this study (mean age 84 years, 51% male). Median follow-up was 19 months (interquartile range 8.8-40 months) with a median survival of 7.2 years (interquartile range 3.5-10.3 years). NLR was associated with 30-day mortality (OR 1.75; 95% CI 1.25-2.68; p<0.01). PLRs marginally predicted 1-year mortality (OR 1.01; 95% CI 1.00-1.02). However, only the STS-PROM score significantly predicted overall survival (hazard ratio 1.07; 95% CI 1.02-1.12; p=0.03) after adjustment for NLR and PLR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NLR is associated with 30-day mortality following TAVI. PLR was not a clinically significant predictor of mortality after TAVI. Only the STS-PROM score remained a significant predictor of overall survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":13000,"journal":{"name":"Heart, Lung and Circulation","volume":" ","pages":"1680-1687"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart, Lung and Circulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2024.07.006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are simple biomarkers that reflect systemic inflammation and are associated with adverse cardiovascular disease outcomes. The utility of NLR and PLR for risk prediction following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is not clear.

Method: We retrospectively analysed a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent TAVI at a tertiary hospital from 2009 to 2022. Baseline demographics, NLR, PLR and Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality (STS-PROM) scores were obtained. The 30-day and 1-year survival rates were analysed using a logistic regression model while overall survival was analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Predictors of survival were calculated using a Cox-hazards regression model and presented as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results: Overall, 367 patients were included in this study (mean age 84 years, 51% male). Median follow-up was 19 months (interquartile range 8.8-40 months) with a median survival of 7.2 years (interquartile range 3.5-10.3 years). NLR was associated with 30-day mortality (OR 1.75; 95% CI 1.25-2.68; p<0.01). PLRs marginally predicted 1-year mortality (OR 1.01; 95% CI 1.00-1.02). However, only the STS-PROM score significantly predicted overall survival (hazard ratio 1.07; 95% CI 1.02-1.12; p=0.03) after adjustment for NLR and PLR.

Conclusions: NLR is associated with 30-day mortality following TAVI. PLR was not a clinically significant predictor of mortality after TAVI. Only the STS-PROM score remained a significant predictor of overall survival.

使用中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比值和血小板-淋巴细胞比值预测经导管主动脉瓣植入术死亡率。
目的:中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比值(NLR)和血小板-淋巴细胞比值(PLR)是反映全身炎症的简单生物标志物,与心血管疾病的不良预后有关。NLR和PLR对经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)后风险预测的作用尚不明确:我们回顾性分析了一个前瞻性数据库,该数据库收录了 2009 年至 2022 年期间在一家三级医院接受 TAVI 手术的患者。我们获得了基线人口统计学数据、NLR、PLR和胸外科医师学会预测死亡率风险(STS-PROM)评分。30 天和 1 年生存率采用逻辑回归模型进行分析,总生存率采用 Kaplan-Meier 法进行分析。采用 Cox 危险回归模型计算生存率的预测因素,并以几率比(OR)和 95% 置信区间(CI)表示:本研究共纳入 367 名患者(平均年龄 84 岁,51% 为男性)。中位随访时间为 19 个月(四分位数间距为 8.8-40 个月),中位生存期为 7.2 年(四分位数间距为 3.5-10.3 年)。NLR与30天死亡率相关(OR 1.75;95% CI 1.25-2.68;p结论:NLR与TAVI术后30天死亡率相关。PLR对预测TAVI术后死亡率没有临床意义。只有STS-PROM评分仍是总生存率的重要预测指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Heart, Lung and Circulation
Heart, Lung and Circulation CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.80%
发文量
912
审稿时长
11.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Heart, Lung and Circulation publishes articles integrating clinical and research activities in the fields of basic cardiovascular science, clinical cardiology and cardiac surgery, with a focus on emerging issues in cardiovascular disease. The journal promotes multidisciplinary dialogue between cardiologists, cardiothoracic surgeons, cardio-pulmonary physicians and cardiovascular scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信