Maria Salazar, Siavash Shahbazi Nia, Nadezhda A German, Babafela Awosile, Saheed Sabiu, Alexandra Calle
{"title":"Exploring diflunisal as a synergistic agent against <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> biofilm formation.","authors":"Maria Salazar, Siavash Shahbazi Nia, Nadezhda A German, Babafela Awosile, Saheed Sabiu, Alexandra Calle","doi":"10.3389/fmicb.2024.1399996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> is a bacterial pathogen of considerable significance in public health, capable of inducing a diverse range of infectious diseases. One of the most notorious mechanisms used by <i>S. aureus</i> to survive and colonize the site of infection is its ability to form biofilms. Diflunisal, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), is a known inhibitor of the Agr system in <i>S. aureus</i>, which is key in regulating biofilm formation. This study evaluated the effect of broad-spectrum antibiotics in combination with diflunisal on <i>S. aureus</i> biofilm density. Eight antibiotics were tested independently at different concentrations and in combination with diflunisal to assess their effect on <i>S. aureus</i> biofilm formation. When using the antibiotics alone and with diflunisal, a significant control effect on biofilm formation was observed (<i>p</i> < 0.05), irrespective of diflunisal presence, but did not achieve a complete biofilm growth inhibition. Over time, diflunisal influenced biofilm formation; however, such an effect was correlated with antibiotic concentration and exposure time. With amikacin treatments, biofilm density increased with extended exposure time. In the case of imipenem, doripenem, levofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin, lower doses and absence of diflunisal showed higher control over biofilm growth with longer exposure. However, in all cases, diflunisal did not significantly affect the treatment effect on biofilm formation. In the absence of antibiotics, diflunisal significantly reduced biofilm formation by 53.12% (<i>p</i> < 0.05). This study suggests that diflunisal could be a potential treatment to control <i>S. aureus</i> biofilms, but it does not enhance biofilm inhibition when combined with antibiotics.</p>","PeriodicalId":12466,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Microbiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11461217/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2024.1399996","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Staphylococcus aureus is a bacterial pathogen of considerable significance in public health, capable of inducing a diverse range of infectious diseases. One of the most notorious mechanisms used by S. aureus to survive and colonize the site of infection is its ability to form biofilms. Diflunisal, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), is a known inhibitor of the Agr system in S. aureus, which is key in regulating biofilm formation. This study evaluated the effect of broad-spectrum antibiotics in combination with diflunisal on S. aureus biofilm density. Eight antibiotics were tested independently at different concentrations and in combination with diflunisal to assess their effect on S. aureus biofilm formation. When using the antibiotics alone and with diflunisal, a significant control effect on biofilm formation was observed (p < 0.05), irrespective of diflunisal presence, but did not achieve a complete biofilm growth inhibition. Over time, diflunisal influenced biofilm formation; however, such an effect was correlated with antibiotic concentration and exposure time. With amikacin treatments, biofilm density increased with extended exposure time. In the case of imipenem, doripenem, levofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin, lower doses and absence of diflunisal showed higher control over biofilm growth with longer exposure. However, in all cases, diflunisal did not significantly affect the treatment effect on biofilm formation. In the absence of antibiotics, diflunisal significantly reduced biofilm formation by 53.12% (p < 0.05). This study suggests that diflunisal could be a potential treatment to control S. aureus biofilms, but it does not enhance biofilm inhibition when combined with antibiotics.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Microbiology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the entire spectrum of microbiology. Field Chief Editor Martin G. Klotz at Washington State University is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.