Can systemic antibiotics reduce the need for surgical intervention in treating peri-implantitis?

Q3 Dentistry
Nidhi Parmar
{"title":"Can systemic antibiotics reduce the need for surgical intervention in treating peri-implantitis?","authors":"Nidhi Parmar","doi":"10.1038/s41432-024-01071-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A retrospective cohort design was used to assess the long-term clinical effectiveness of systemic amoxicillin and metronidazole, used adjunctively with non-surgical peri-implantitis treatment (NST) and whether it prevents the need for further surgical interventions. Of the 57 peri-implantitis patients examined, 45 patients were included in this study. The participants were divided into two subgroups in accordance to who had received NST with or without systemic antibiotics. Selection was based on prior participation in a three-month randomised control trial, ensuring comparability of data regarding peri-implantitis severity and treatment history. Data were extracted pre-treatment, 3-months post-treatment and at a long-term follow-up interval of 36 months. The primary outcome was the need for additional surgical intervention and was analysed via Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox regression. A multitude of secondary clinical outcomes were evaluated using parametric and non-parametric tests, including peri- implant probing depth, bleeding scores and treatment success. Overall, 62.2% of the 45 NST patients did not need surgical peri-implantitis treatment: 73.9% of the subgroup with antibiotics and 50% of the subgroup without antibiotics respectively. However, the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (log-rank test, p = 0.110). The Cox regression analysis also displayed no significance over the first three years post-treatment (p = 0.115). Additionally, the study found that deeper peri- implant pockets at baseline significantly predicted the need for future surgical treatment (p = 0.031), highlighting the importance of initial disease severity in treatment outcomes. The study concludes that the adjunctive use of systemic amoxicillin and metronidazole with NST may delay but not statistically reduce or prevent a future surgical need. Although a short-term reduction in clinical inflammatory parameters was evident, the long-term effectiveness in altering the progression of peri-implantitis remains limited.","PeriodicalId":12234,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based dentistry","volume":"25 4","pages":"182-183"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41432-024-01071-x.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41432-024-01071-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A retrospective cohort design was used to assess the long-term clinical effectiveness of systemic amoxicillin and metronidazole, used adjunctively with non-surgical peri-implantitis treatment (NST) and whether it prevents the need for further surgical interventions. Of the 57 peri-implantitis patients examined, 45 patients were included in this study. The participants were divided into two subgroups in accordance to who had received NST with or without systemic antibiotics. Selection was based on prior participation in a three-month randomised control trial, ensuring comparability of data regarding peri-implantitis severity and treatment history. Data were extracted pre-treatment, 3-months post-treatment and at a long-term follow-up interval of 36 months. The primary outcome was the need for additional surgical intervention and was analysed via Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox regression. A multitude of secondary clinical outcomes were evaluated using parametric and non-parametric tests, including peri- implant probing depth, bleeding scores and treatment success. Overall, 62.2% of the 45 NST patients did not need surgical peri-implantitis treatment: 73.9% of the subgroup with antibiotics and 50% of the subgroup without antibiotics respectively. However, the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (log-rank test, p = 0.110). The Cox regression analysis also displayed no significance over the first three years post-treatment (p = 0.115). Additionally, the study found that deeper peri- implant pockets at baseline significantly predicted the need for future surgical treatment (p = 0.031), highlighting the importance of initial disease severity in treatment outcomes. The study concludes that the adjunctive use of systemic amoxicillin and metronidazole with NST may delay but not statistically reduce or prevent a future surgical need. Although a short-term reduction in clinical inflammatory parameters was evident, the long-term effectiveness in altering the progression of peri-implantitis remains limited.
系统性抗生素能否减少外科手术治疗种植体周围炎的需要?
设计:采用回顾性队列设计,评估全身性阿莫西林和甲硝唑与非手术种植体周围炎治疗(NST)联合使用的长期临床疗效,以及是否可以避免进一步的手术干预:在接受检查的 57 名种植体周围炎患者中,有 45 名患者被纳入本研究。根据患者是否接受过全身抗生素治疗,将其分为两个亚组。选择的依据是之前是否参加过为期三个月的随机对照试验,以确保有关种植体周围炎严重程度和治疗史的数据具有可比性:数据分析:提取治疗前、治疗后 3 个月和 36 个月长期随访的数据。主要结果是是否需要额外的手术干预,并通过卡普兰-梅耶分析和考克斯回归进行分析。采用参数和非参数检验方法对多项次要临床结果进行了评估,包括种植体周围探查深度、出血评分和治疗成功率:总体而言,45 名 NST 患者中有 62.2% 无需进行种植体周围炎手术治疗:使用抗生素的亚组和未使用抗生素的亚组分别为 73.9%和 50%。不过,两组之间的差异并无统计学意义(对数秩检验,P = 0.110)。在治疗后的头三年,Cox 回归分析也没有显示出显著性(p = 0.115)。此外,研究还发现,基线时较深的种植体周围凹陷明显预示着未来手术治疗的必要性(p = 0.031),这突出了初期疾病严重程度对治疗结果的重要性:该研究得出结论,在 NST 的基础上辅助使用全身性阿莫西林和甲硝唑可能会延缓未来的手术需求,但从统计学角度来看,并不能减少或避免未来的手术需求。虽然临床炎症指标在短期内明显下降,但在改变种植体周围炎进展方面的长期有效性仍然有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Evidence-based dentistry
Evidence-based dentistry Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Evidence-Based Dentistry delivers the best available evidence on the latest developments in oral health. We evaluate the evidence and provide guidance concerning the value of the author''s conclusions. We keep dentistry up to date with new approaches, exploring a wide range of the latest developments through an accessible expert commentary. Original papers and relevant publications are condensed into digestible summaries, drawing attention to the current methods and findings. We are a central resource for the most cutting edge and relevant issues concerning the evidence-based approach in dentistry today. Evidence-Based Dentistry is published by Springer Nature on behalf of the British Dental Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信