Irma Lorenzo-Capellá, Juan José Ramos-Álvarez, Maria Elena Jiménez-Herranz, Nicola Maffulli, Edilson Fernando de Borba, Enzo Iuliano, Francisco Javier Calderón-Montero, Luca Paolo Ardigò, Luca Russo, Johnny Padulo
{"title":"Highest oxygen consumption prediction: introducing variable theoretical proportional factors for different sports.","authors":"Irma Lorenzo-Capellá, Juan José Ramos-Álvarez, Maria Elena Jiménez-Herranz, Nicola Maffulli, Edilson Fernando de Borba, Enzo Iuliano, Francisco Javier Calderón-Montero, Luca Paolo Ardigò, Luca Russo, Johnny Padulo","doi":"10.1007/s00421-024-05625-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The use of a fixed theoretical-proportional-factor (TPF<sub>15</sub>) is one of the indirect highest-oxygen-consumptions (HOC) assessment methods, but it may not accurately reflect the physiological differences across various sports (cycling-triathlon-running-football-multisport). The aim of this study is to evaluate the variability of TPF across different sports, proposing a series of sport-specific new TPF values for more accurate HOC estimation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A sample of 340 adults (26.01 ± 7.18 years) performed a maximal-incremental-test using sport-specific-ergometers. HOC was considered for cycling <math> <msub> <mrow><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <mtext>O</mtext></mrow> <mtext>2peak</mtext></msub> </math> , whereas for the other investigated sports it was considered <math> <msub> <mrow><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <mtext>O</mtext></mrow> <mtext>2max</mtext></msub> </math> . HOC was directly measured using a gas-analyzer, and TPF values were calculated using heart rate (HR): the ratio of HR<sub>max</sub>/HR<sub>rest</sub> multiplied for the measured values of HOC. A one-way ANOVA was used to measure differences and Bland-Altman plots were constructed to compare predicted and actual <math> <msub> <mrow><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <mtext>O</mtext></mrow> <mtext>2max</mtext></msub> </math> / <math> <msub> <mrow><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <mtext>O</mtext></mrow> <mtext>2peak</mtext></msub> </math> .</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Actual HOC was significantly greater than those predicted by the fixed TPF<sub>15</sub> (P < 0.001). Sport-specific new TPF values ranged from 16.55 in multisport to 20.15 in cycling, consistently exceeding the old fixed TPF<sub>15</sub>, and predicting therefore better HOC. The new TPF exhibited a closer agreement with the directly measured <math> <msub> <mrow><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <mtext>O</mtext></mrow> <mtext>2max</mtext></msub> </math> / <math> <msub> <mrow><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <mtext>O</mtext></mrow> <mtext>2peak</mtext></msub> </math> compared to the TPF<sub>15</sub>. Furthermore, the new TPF reduced the typical-measurement-error (14.94-17.78%) compared to TPF<sub>15</sub> (15.63-24.13%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that new TPF values predict <math> <msub> <mrow><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <mtext>O</mtext></mrow> <mtext>2max</mtext></msub> </math> / <math> <msub> <mrow><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <mtext>O</mtext></mrow> <mtext>2peak</mtext></msub> </math> with higher accuracy compared to the traditional method. The use of HR<sub>max</sub> and HR<sub>rest</sub> values allows to customize training programs for different athletes. Future research should focus on validating these findings across larger populations of athletes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12005,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","volume":" ","pages":"687-696"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-024-05625-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The use of a fixed theoretical-proportional-factor (TPF15) is one of the indirect highest-oxygen-consumptions (HOC) assessment methods, but it may not accurately reflect the physiological differences across various sports (cycling-triathlon-running-football-multisport). The aim of this study is to evaluate the variability of TPF across different sports, proposing a series of sport-specific new TPF values for more accurate HOC estimation.
Methods: A sample of 340 adults (26.01 ± 7.18 years) performed a maximal-incremental-test using sport-specific-ergometers. HOC was considered for cycling , whereas for the other investigated sports it was considered . HOC was directly measured using a gas-analyzer, and TPF values were calculated using heart rate (HR): the ratio of HRmax/HRrest multiplied for the measured values of HOC. A one-way ANOVA was used to measure differences and Bland-Altman plots were constructed to compare predicted and actual / .
Results: Actual HOC was significantly greater than those predicted by the fixed TPF15 (P < 0.001). Sport-specific new TPF values ranged from 16.55 in multisport to 20.15 in cycling, consistently exceeding the old fixed TPF15, and predicting therefore better HOC. The new TPF exhibited a closer agreement with the directly measured / compared to the TPF15. Furthermore, the new TPF reduced the typical-measurement-error (14.94-17.78%) compared to TPF15 (15.63-24.13%).
Conclusion: This study suggests that new TPF values predict / with higher accuracy compared to the traditional method. The use of HRmax and HRrest values allows to customize training programs for different athletes. Future research should focus on validating these findings across larger populations of athletes.
目的:使用固定的理论比例系数(TPF15)是间接评估最高耗氧量(HOC)的方法之一,但它可能无法准确反映不同运动(自行车-铁人三项-跑步-足球-综合运动)的生理差异。本研究旨在评估不同运动的 TPF 变异性,提出一系列针对特定运动的新 TPF 值,以便更准确地估算 HOC:方法:340 名成年人(26.01 ± 7.18 岁)使用运动专用测力计进行了最大增量测试。自行车运动的 HOC 值为 V ˙ O 2 峰值,而其他运动的 HOC 值为 V ˙ O 2 最大值。使用气体分析仪直接测量 HOC,并使用心率(HR)计算 TPF 值:HRmax/HRrest 的比率乘以 HOC 的测量值。采用单因素方差分析来测量差异,并绘制布兰-阿尔特曼图来比较预测值和实际值 V ˙ O 2max / V ˙ O 2peak :实际 HOC 明显高于固定 TPF15 的预测值(P 15),因此预测的 HOC 更好。与 TPF15 相比,新的 TPF 与直接测量的 V ˙ O 2max / V ˙ O 2peak 更接近。此外,与 TPF15(15.63-24.13%)相比,新 TPF 降低了典型测量误差(14.94-17.78%):本研究表明,与传统方法相比,新 TPF 值预测 V ˙ O 2max / V ˙ O 2peak 的准确性更高。使用心率最大值和心率峰值可以为不同运动员定制训练计划。未来的研究应侧重于在更大的运动员群体中验证这些发现。
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Applied Physiology (EJAP) aims to promote mechanistic advances in human integrative and translational physiology. Physiology is viewed broadly, having overlapping context with related disciplines such as biomechanics, biochemistry, endocrinology, ergonomics, immunology, motor control, and nutrition. EJAP welcomes studies dealing with physical exercise, training and performance. Studies addressing physiological mechanisms are preferred over descriptive studies. Papers dealing with animal models or pathophysiological conditions are not excluded from consideration, but must be clearly relevant to human physiology.