Erik Vindbjerg, Hinuga Sandahl, Laura Glahder Lindberg, Henriette Laugesen Attardo, Erik Lykke Mortensen, Jessica Carlsson
{"title":"Predictors and Patterns of Dropout From Psychiatric Treatment Among Trauma-Affected Refugees: A Large Data Pool Analysis","authors":"Erik Vindbjerg, Hinuga Sandahl, Laura Glahder Lindberg, Henriette Laugesen Attardo, Erik Lykke Mortensen, Jessica Carlsson","doi":"10.1002/cpp.3060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Dropout from mental health treatment is a substantial hindrance to relevant and effective treatment. Despite the high prevalence of PTSD among refugees, research into their treatment dropout has received limited attention. This study aimed to identify patterns and predictors of treatment dropout versus completion through different treatment stages. The sample included 940 patients with a refugee background undergoing outpatient treatment for PTSD in Denmark. All patients were offered 10 medical doctor sessions and 16–20 psychotherapy sessions. Dropout was analysed in three stages: (1) during the first six MD sessions, (2) during the first eight psychotherapy sessions upon completion of Stage 1, and (3) during psychotherapy sessions 9 to 16. A stepwise multiple regression analysis was conducted for each stage to identify predictors of stage-specific dropout. Counter to expectations, both early dropout and full completion were associated with better symptom outcomes, relative to late-treatment dropout. Key predictors varied by stage, with younger age predicting early dropout, whereas chronic pain and poor Danish proficiency predicted late dropout. Female gender and a clearly articulated motivation for active participation were predictors for full treatment completion. Practical advice is suggested to accommodate at-risk patients and to re-evaluate patient engagement after familiarisation with treatment.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.3060","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Dropout from mental health treatment is a substantial hindrance to relevant and effective treatment. Despite the high prevalence of PTSD among refugees, research into their treatment dropout has received limited attention. This study aimed to identify patterns and predictors of treatment dropout versus completion through different treatment stages. The sample included 940 patients with a refugee background undergoing outpatient treatment for PTSD in Denmark. All patients were offered 10 medical doctor sessions and 16–20 psychotherapy sessions. Dropout was analysed in three stages: (1) during the first six MD sessions, (2) during the first eight psychotherapy sessions upon completion of Stage 1, and (3) during psychotherapy sessions 9 to 16. A stepwise multiple regression analysis was conducted for each stage to identify predictors of stage-specific dropout. Counter to expectations, both early dropout and full completion were associated with better symptom outcomes, relative to late-treatment dropout. Key predictors varied by stage, with younger age predicting early dropout, whereas chronic pain and poor Danish proficiency predicted late dropout. Female gender and a clearly articulated motivation for active participation were predictors for full treatment completion. Practical advice is suggested to accommodate at-risk patients and to re-evaluate patient engagement after familiarisation with treatment.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy aims to keep clinical psychologists and psychotherapists up to date with new developments in their fields. The Journal will provide an integrative impetus both between theory and practice and between different orientations within clinical psychology and psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy will be a forum in which practitioners can present their wealth of expertise and innovations in order to make these available to a wider audience. Equally, the Journal will contain reports from researchers who want to address a larger clinical audience with clinically relevant issues and clinically valid research.