Outcomes of Percutaneous Endobiliary Radiofrequency Ablation in Managing Resistant Benign Biliary Strictures: A Retrospective Analysis.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Ali Husnain, Abdul Aziz Aadam, Rajesh Keswani, Jasmine Sinha, Juan Carlos Caicedo, Andres Duarte, Kristine Stiff, Allison Reiland, Daniel Borja Cacho, Riad Salem, Ahsun Riaz
{"title":"Outcomes of Percutaneous Endobiliary Radiofrequency Ablation in Managing Resistant Benign Biliary Strictures: A Retrospective Analysis.","authors":"Ali Husnain, Abdul Aziz Aadam, Rajesh Keswani, Jasmine Sinha, Juan Carlos Caicedo, Andres Duarte, Kristine Stiff, Allison Reiland, Daniel Borja Cacho, Riad Salem, Ahsun Riaz","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqae204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the safety and effectiveness of percutaneous endobiliary radiofrequency ablation (EB-RFA) in the management of refractory benign biliary strictures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Percutaneous EB-RFA was performed in 15 individuals (M/F = 8/7; median age: 57 [33-84]) for benign biliary strictures resistant to traditional methods (transhepatic cholangioplasty and biliary drains). All patients underwent ≥1 unsuccessful cholangioplasty session and upsizing of their transhepatic biliary drains pre-procedure. Technical and clinical success were defined as luminal gain with enhanced flow and a lack of clinically evident recurrent stricture on follow-up after drain/stent removal, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 16 EB-RFA procedures were performed. Technical success rate was 100% (16/16). Procedure-related complications occurred in 1/16 cases (drain leakage with subsequent cellulitis). Clinical success rate was 87% (13/15) with a median follow-up of 17 (2-24) months. Drain/stent was not removed in one case (1/16) as the patient was lost to follow-up immediately post-procedure. The 1-year patency rate was 100%. A significant reduction was observed in the median number of IR visits (8 [1-51] to 1 [0-9]; p = 0.003) and drain insertion/exchange procedures (5 [1-45] to 0 [0-6]; p = 0.003) pre- and post-EB-RFA with a median follow-up of 18 (0-26) months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Percutaneous EB-RFA can safely and effectively treat refractory benign biliary strictures. However, larger prospective studies with extended follow-ups are needed to gather more robust data.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>This study contributes to the limited evidence on the role of EB-RFA in addressing refractory benign biliary strictures, enhancing the understanding of its clinical utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqae204","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the safety and effectiveness of percutaneous endobiliary radiofrequency ablation (EB-RFA) in the management of refractory benign biliary strictures.

Materials and methods: Percutaneous EB-RFA was performed in 15 individuals (M/F = 8/7; median age: 57 [33-84]) for benign biliary strictures resistant to traditional methods (transhepatic cholangioplasty and biliary drains). All patients underwent ≥1 unsuccessful cholangioplasty session and upsizing of their transhepatic biliary drains pre-procedure. Technical and clinical success were defined as luminal gain with enhanced flow and a lack of clinically evident recurrent stricture on follow-up after drain/stent removal, respectively.

Results: A total of 16 EB-RFA procedures were performed. Technical success rate was 100% (16/16). Procedure-related complications occurred in 1/16 cases (drain leakage with subsequent cellulitis). Clinical success rate was 87% (13/15) with a median follow-up of 17 (2-24) months. Drain/stent was not removed in one case (1/16) as the patient was lost to follow-up immediately post-procedure. The 1-year patency rate was 100%. A significant reduction was observed in the median number of IR visits (8 [1-51] to 1 [0-9]; p = 0.003) and drain insertion/exchange procedures (5 [1-45] to 0 [0-6]; p = 0.003) pre- and post-EB-RFA with a median follow-up of 18 (0-26) months.

Conclusion: Percutaneous EB-RFA can safely and effectively treat refractory benign biliary strictures. However, larger prospective studies with extended follow-ups are needed to gather more robust data.

Advances in knowledge: This study contributes to the limited evidence on the role of EB-RFA in addressing refractory benign biliary strictures, enhancing the understanding of its clinical utility.

经皮胆道内射频消融术治疗顽固性良性胆道狭窄的疗效:回顾性分析
目的:评估经皮胆管射频消融术(EB-RFA)治疗难治性良性胆道狭窄的安全性和有效性:评估经皮胆道内射频消融术(EB-RFA)治疗难治性良性胆道狭窄的安全性和有效性:对15例(男/女=8/7;中位年龄:57 [33-84])传统方法(经肝胆管成形术和胆道引流术)治疗无效的良性胆道狭窄患者实施了经皮胆管射频消融术。所有患者都接受了≥1次不成功的胆管成形术,并在术前扩大了经肝胆道引流管的尺寸。技术和临床成功的定义分别为管腔增大,血流增强,以及引流管/支架移除后随访无临床明显的复发性狭窄:结果:共进行了16例EB-RFA手术。结果:共进行了16例EB-RFA手术,技术成功率为100%(16/16)。1/16的病例出现了与手术相关的并发症(引流管渗漏并继发蜂窝组织炎)。临床成功率为87%(13/15),中位随访时间为17(2-24)个月。有一例(1/16)患者在术后立即失去了随访,因此引流管/支架未被移除。1 年通畅率为 100%。EB-RFA前后的中位随访时间为18(0-26)个月,EB-RFA前后的中位IR就诊次数(8 [1-51] 到 1 [0-9];p = 0.003)和引流管插入/更换手术次数(5 [1-45] 到 0 [0-6];p = 0.003)明显减少:结论:经皮 EB-RFA 可以安全有效地治疗难治性良性胆道狭窄。结论:经皮 EB-RFA 可以安全有效地治疗难治性良性胆道狭窄,但需要更大规模的前瞻性研究和更长时间的随访来收集更可靠的数据:这项研究为EB-RFA在治疗难治性良性胆道狭窄方面作用的有限证据做出了贡献,加深了人们对其临床效用的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Radiology
British Journal of Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
330
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences. Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840 - Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks - Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks - ISSN: 0007-1285 - eISSN: 1748-880X Open Access option
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信