The value evaluation of Nomogram prediction model based on CTA imaging features for selecting treatment methods for isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Xiaodong Jiang, Dongjian Chen, Qingbin Meng, Xiaokan Liu, Li Liang, Bosheng He, Wenbin Ding
{"title":"The value evaluation of Nomogram prediction model based on CTA imaging features for selecting treatment methods for isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection.","authors":"Xiaodong Jiang, Dongjian Chen, Qingbin Meng, Xiaokan Liu, Li Liang, Bosheng He, Wenbin Ding","doi":"10.1186/s12880-024-01438-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate value of Nomogram prediction model based on CTA imaging features for selecting treatment methods for isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection (ISMAD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Symptomatic ISMAD patients were randomly divided into a training set and a validation set in a 7:3 ratio. In the training set, relevant risk factors for conservative treatment failure in ISMAD patients were analyzed, and a Nomogram prediction model for treatment outcome of ISMAD was constructed with risk factors. The predictive value of the model was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Low true lumen residual ratio (TLRR), long dissection length, and large arterial angle (superior mesenteric artery [SMA]/abdominal aorta [AA]) were identified as independent high-risk factors for conservative treatment failure (P < 0.05). The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) results showed that the area under curve (AUC) of Nomogram prediction model was 0.826 (95% CI: 0.740-0.912), indicating good discrimination. The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test showed good consistency between the predicted curve and the ideal curve of the Nomogram prediction model. The decision curve analysis (DCA) analysis results showed that when probability threshold for the occurrence of conservative treatment failure predicted was 0.05-0.98, patients could obtain more net benefits. Similar results were obtained for the predictive value in the validation set.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Low TLRR, long dissection length, and large arterial angle (SMA/AA) are independent high-risk factors for conservative treatment failure in ISMAD. The Nomogram model constructed with independent high-risk factors has good clinical effectiveness in predicting the failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":9020,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Imaging","volume":"24 1","pages":"267"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11460108/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-024-01438-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate value of Nomogram prediction model based on CTA imaging features for selecting treatment methods for isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection (ISMAD).

Methods: Symptomatic ISMAD patients were randomly divided into a training set and a validation set in a 7:3 ratio. In the training set, relevant risk factors for conservative treatment failure in ISMAD patients were analyzed, and a Nomogram prediction model for treatment outcome of ISMAD was constructed with risk factors. The predictive value of the model was evaluated.

Results: Low true lumen residual ratio (TLRR), long dissection length, and large arterial angle (superior mesenteric artery [SMA]/abdominal aorta [AA]) were identified as independent high-risk factors for conservative treatment failure (P < 0.05). The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) results showed that the area under curve (AUC) of Nomogram prediction model was 0.826 (95% CI: 0.740-0.912), indicating good discrimination. The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test showed good consistency between the predicted curve and the ideal curve of the Nomogram prediction model. The decision curve analysis (DCA) analysis results showed that when probability threshold for the occurrence of conservative treatment failure predicted was 0.05-0.98, patients could obtain more net benefits. Similar results were obtained for the predictive value in the validation set.

Conclusion: Low TLRR, long dissection length, and large arterial angle (SMA/AA) are independent high-risk factors for conservative treatment failure in ISMAD. The Nomogram model constructed with independent high-risk factors has good clinical effectiveness in predicting the failure.

基于 CTA 成像特征的 Nomogram 预测模型对孤立性肠系膜上动脉夹层治疗方法选择的价值评估。
目的评估基于 CTA 成像特征的 Nomogram 预测模型在选择孤立性肠系膜上动脉夹层(ISMAD)治疗方法方面的价值:按 7:3 的比例将有症状的 ISMAD 患者随机分为训练集和验证集。在训练集中,分析了 ISMAD 患者保守治疗失败的相关风险因素,并结合风险因素构建了 ISMAD 治疗结果的 Nomogram 预测模型。对模型的预测价值进行了评估:结果:低真腔残留率(TLRR)、长夹层长度和大动脉角(肠系膜上动脉 [SMA] / 腹主动脉 [AA])被认为是保守治疗失败的独立高危因素(P 结论:低真腔残留率、长夹层长度和大动脉角是导致保守治疗失败的独立高危因素:TLRR低、夹层长度长和动脉角度大(SMA/AA)是导致ISMAD保守治疗失败的独立高危因素。利用独立高危因素构建的 Nomogram 模型在预测治疗失败方面具有良好的临床效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Imaging
BMC Medical Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
198
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Imaging is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the development, evaluation, and use of imaging techniques and image processing tools to diagnose and manage disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信