Exploring barriers to and facilitators of infection prevention and control practices in the Pediatrics and Child Health Department of Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Ethiopia.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Mengistu Yilma, Girma Taye, Muluwork Tefera, Berhan Tassew, Atalay Mulu Fentie, Workeabeba Abebe
{"title":"Exploring barriers to and facilitators of infection prevention and control practices in the Pediatrics and Child Health Department of Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Ethiopia.","authors":"Mengistu Yilma, Girma Taye, Muluwork Tefera, Berhan Tassew, Atalay Mulu Fentie, Workeabeba Abebe","doi":"10.1186/s13756-024-01475-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adherence to infection prevention and control (IPC) standards and guidelines by healthcare workers is essential for reducing the spread of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). However, IPC practices among healthcare workers in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), including Ethiopia, are generally inadequate. This research aims to identify the barriers to and facilitators of IPC practices in the Pediatrics and Child Health Department of Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital (TASH) in Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We employed a rapid ethnographic assessment (REA) approach for this study, using focus group discussions (FGDs), in-depth interviews (IDIs), and observations to collect data. Participants were selected from the Pediatrics and Child Health Department of TASH, and data collection took place in March and April 2022. Two FGDs and eight IDIs were conducted in the participants' workplace within the department. Unstructured guides were used to facilitate the FGDs and IDIs. Nvivo version 10 software was used for data organization and analysis. The data were coded deductively through thematic analysis to identify similar ideas and concepts, based on the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) model.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A total of 23 healthcare workers participated, with 15 in FGDs and 8 in IDIs. The study identified several barriers to IPC practices, including nonadherence to IPC practice protocols, lack of pre-employment training, space constraints, insufficient maintenance and repair of equipment, limited management engagement and support, shortage of resources and budget, incidents of needle stick injuries and infections, high workloads for healthcare workers, shortages of personal protective equipment and water supply, and inadequate waste management. We also identified some facilitators, including the existence of an IPC team and committee, a health education schedule for patients and visitors, morning sessions for healthcare providers, and the presence of television screens in waiting areas. By addressing the identified barriers and leveraging the facilitators, department heads, IPC team leaders, and decision-makers can develop targeted strategies and interventions to improve infection control, reduce the spread of HAIs, and ultimately enhance the quality of healthcare services.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study explored several barriers that contribute to inappropriate and suboptimal IPC practices in the study area. These barriers create significant challenges for healthcare workers and hindering their ability to effectively implement IPC practices. The findings highlight the complex and multifaceted nature of the problems, which not only affect the current working environment but also compromise the overall quality of care. The hospital administrator should address these critical issues to improving IPC practices and ensuring a safer healthcare environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":7950,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11463063/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-024-01475-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adherence to infection prevention and control (IPC) standards and guidelines by healthcare workers is essential for reducing the spread of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). However, IPC practices among healthcare workers in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), including Ethiopia, are generally inadequate. This research aims to identify the barriers to and facilitators of IPC practices in the Pediatrics and Child Health Department of Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital (TASH) in Ethiopia.

Methods: We employed a rapid ethnographic assessment (REA) approach for this study, using focus group discussions (FGDs), in-depth interviews (IDIs), and observations to collect data. Participants were selected from the Pediatrics and Child Health Department of TASH, and data collection took place in March and April 2022. Two FGDs and eight IDIs were conducted in the participants' workplace within the department. Unstructured guides were used to facilitate the FGDs and IDIs. Nvivo version 10 software was used for data organization and analysis. The data were coded deductively through thematic analysis to identify similar ideas and concepts, based on the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) model.

Result: A total of 23 healthcare workers participated, with 15 in FGDs and 8 in IDIs. The study identified several barriers to IPC practices, including nonadherence to IPC practice protocols, lack of pre-employment training, space constraints, insufficient maintenance and repair of equipment, limited management engagement and support, shortage of resources and budget, incidents of needle stick injuries and infections, high workloads for healthcare workers, shortages of personal protective equipment and water supply, and inadequate waste management. We also identified some facilitators, including the existence of an IPC team and committee, a health education schedule for patients and visitors, morning sessions for healthcare providers, and the presence of television screens in waiting areas. By addressing the identified barriers and leveraging the facilitators, department heads, IPC team leaders, and decision-makers can develop targeted strategies and interventions to improve infection control, reduce the spread of HAIs, and ultimately enhance the quality of healthcare services.

Conclusion: This study explored several barriers that contribute to inappropriate and suboptimal IPC practices in the study area. These barriers create significant challenges for healthcare workers and hindering their ability to effectively implement IPC practices. The findings highlight the complex and multifaceted nature of the problems, which not only affect the current working environment but also compromise the overall quality of care. The hospital administrator should address these critical issues to improving IPC practices and ensuring a safer healthcare environment.

探讨埃塞俄比亚 Tikur Anbessa 专科医院儿科和儿童保健部开展感染预防和控制工作的障碍和促进因素。
背景:医护人员遵守感染预防与控制(IPC)标准和指南对于减少医疗相关感染(HAIs)的传播至关重要。然而,包括埃塞俄比亚在内的中低收入国家(LMICs)医护人员的感染预防和控制实践普遍不足。本研究旨在确定埃塞俄比亚 Tikur Anbessa 专科医院(TASH)儿科和儿童保健部实施 IPC 的障碍和促进因素:本研究采用快速人种学评估 (REA) 方法,通过焦点小组讨论 (FGD)、深度访谈 (IDI) 和观察来收集数据。参与者选自 TASH 的儿科和儿童健康部,数据收集工作于 2022 年 3 月和 4 月进行。在参与者所在部门的工作场所进行了两次小组讨论和八次深入访谈。FGD 和 IDI 采用非结构化指南。数据整理和分析使用了 Nvivo 第 10 版软件。根据患者安全系统工程倡议(SEIPS)模型,通过专题分析对数据进行演绎编码,以确定类似的想法和概念:共有 23 名医护人员参与了研究,其中 15 人参与了专题小组讨论,8 人参与了 IDI。研究发现了 IPC 实践的几个障碍,包括不遵守 IPC 实践协议、缺乏上岗前培训、空间限制、设备维护和维修不足、管理层参与和支持有限、资源和预算短缺、针刺伤害和感染事件、医护人员工作量大、个人防护设备和供水短缺以及废物管理不足。同时,我们也发现了一些促进因素,其中包括 IPC 团队和委员会的存在、针对患者和来访者的健康教育计划、针对医护人员的晨会以及候诊区的电视屏幕。通过解决已发现的障碍和利用促进因素,科室主任、IPC 团队领导和决策者可以制定有针对性的策略和干预措施,以改善感染控制、减少 HAIs 传播,并最终提高医疗服务质量:本研究探讨了造成研究地区不适当和不理想的 IPC 实践的几个障碍。这些障碍给医护人员带来了巨大挑战,阻碍了他们有效实施 IPC 实践的能力。研究结果凸显了这些问题的复杂性和多面性,它们不仅影响了当前的工作环境,还损害了整体医疗质量。医院管理者应解决这些关键问题,以改善 IPC 实践,确保医疗环境更加安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -INFECTIOUS DISEASES
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
140
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control is a global forum for all those working on the prevention, diagnostic and treatment of health-care associated infections and antimicrobial resistance development in all health-care settings. The journal covers a broad spectrum of preeminent practices and best available data to the top interventional and translational research, and innovative developments in the field of infection control.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信