Radiomic features on multiparametric MRI for differentiating pseudoprogression from recurrence in high-grade gliomas.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Acta radiologica Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1177/02841851241283781
Jie Lin, Chun-Qiu Su, Wen-Tian Tang, Zhi-Wei Xia, Shan-Shan Lu, Xun-Ning Hong
{"title":"Radiomic features on multiparametric MRI for differentiating pseudoprogression from recurrence in high-grade gliomas.","authors":"Jie Lin, Chun-Qiu Su, Wen-Tian Tang, Zhi-Wei Xia, Shan-Shan Lu, Xun-Ning Hong","doi":"10.1177/02841851241283781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Distinguishing between tumor recurrence and pseudoprogression (PsP) in high-grade glioma postoperatively is challenging. This study aims to enhance this differentiation using a combination of intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the effectiveness of intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics in improving the differentiation between high-grade glioma recurrence and pseudoprogression after surgery.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 109 cases were randomly divided into training and validation sets, with 1316 features extracted from intratumoral and peritumoral volumes of interest (VOIs) on conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps. Feature selection was performed using the mRMR algorithm, resulting in intratumoral (100 features), peritumoral (100 features), and combined (200 features) subsets. Optimal features were then selected using PCC and RFE algorithms and modeled using LR, SVM, and LDA classifiers. Diagnostic performance was compared using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), evaluated in the validation set. A nomogram was established using radscores from intratumoral, peritumoral, and combined models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The combined model, utilizing 14 optimal features (8 peritumoral, 6 intratumoral) and LR as the best classifier, outperformed the single intratumoral and peritumoral models. In the training set, the AUC values for the combined model, intratumoral model, and peritumoral model were 0.938, 0.921, and 0.847, respectively; in the validation set, the AUC values were 0.841, 0.755, and 0.705. The nomogram model demonstrated AUCs of 0.960 (training set) and 0.850 (validation set).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics is effective in distinguishing high-grade glioma recurrence from pseudoprogression after surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":7143,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica","volume":" ","pages":"1390-1400"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851241283781","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Distinguishing between tumor recurrence and pseudoprogression (PsP) in high-grade glioma postoperatively is challenging. This study aims to enhance this differentiation using a combination of intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics.

Purpose: To assess the effectiveness of intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics in improving the differentiation between high-grade glioma recurrence and pseudoprogression after surgery.

Material and methods: A total of 109 cases were randomly divided into training and validation sets, with 1316 features extracted from intratumoral and peritumoral volumes of interest (VOIs) on conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps. Feature selection was performed using the mRMR algorithm, resulting in intratumoral (100 features), peritumoral (100 features), and combined (200 features) subsets. Optimal features were then selected using PCC and RFE algorithms and modeled using LR, SVM, and LDA classifiers. Diagnostic performance was compared using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), evaluated in the validation set. A nomogram was established using radscores from intratumoral, peritumoral, and combined models.

Results: The combined model, utilizing 14 optimal features (8 peritumoral, 6 intratumoral) and LR as the best classifier, outperformed the single intratumoral and peritumoral models. In the training set, the AUC values for the combined model, intratumoral model, and peritumoral model were 0.938, 0.921, and 0.847, respectively; in the validation set, the AUC values were 0.841, 0.755, and 0.705. The nomogram model demonstrated AUCs of 0.960 (training set) and 0.850 (validation set).

Conclusion: The combination of intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics is effective in distinguishing high-grade glioma recurrence from pseudoprogression after surgery.

用于区分高级别胶质瘤假性进展和复发的多参数磁共振成像的放射学特征。
背景:区分高级别胶质瘤术后肿瘤复发和假性进展(PsP)具有挑战性。目的:评估瘤内和瘤周放射组学在改善高级别胶质瘤术后复发和假性进展之间的区分方面的有效性:将109个病例随机分为训练集和验证集,从常规磁共振成像(MRI)和表观弥散系数(ADC)图上的瘤内和瘤周感兴趣体积(VOI)中提取1316个特征。使用 mRMR 算法进行特征选择,得出瘤内(100 个特征)、瘤周(100 个特征)和综合(200 个特征)子集。然后使用 PCC 和 RFE 算法选择最佳特征,并使用 LR、SVM 和 LDA 分类器建模。诊断性能采用接收者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)进行比较,并在验证集中进行评估。使用瘤内、瘤周和组合模型的radscores建立了一个提名图:利用 14 个最佳特征(8 个瘤周特征,6 个瘤内)和 LR 作为最佳分类器的组合模型的表现优于单一的瘤内和瘤周模型。在训练集中,组合模型、瘤内模型和瘤周模型的 AUC 值分别为 0.938、0.921 和 0.847;在验证集中,AUC 值分别为 0.841、0.755 和 0.705。提名图模型的AUC值分别为0.960(训练集)和0.850(验证集):结论:结合瘤内和瘤周放射组学可有效区分高级别胶质瘤术后复发和假性进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta radiologica
Acta radiologica 医学-核医学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Radiologica publishes articles on all aspects of radiology, from clinical radiology to experimental work. It is known for articles based on experimental work and contrast media research, giving priority to scientific original papers. The distinguished international editorial board also invite review articles, short communications and technical and instrumental notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信