Education and technological innovation in mitigating CO2 emissions and fostering green economic growth in China: Marginal effects and policy threshold analyses.

IF 8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Min He, Babar Nawaz Abbasi, Zhichao Fan
{"title":"Education and technological innovation in mitigating CO<sub>2</sub> emissions and fostering green economic growth in China: Marginal effects and policy threshold analyses.","authors":"Min He, Babar Nawaz Abbasi, Zhichao Fan","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study makes a significant contribution to China's ambitious goals of achieving carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) neutrality and transitioning to green economic growth (GEG), and integrating the theoretical framework of the impact, population, affluence, and technology (IPAT) theory, with real-world application to reduce CO<sub>2</sub> and promote GEG for sustainable development. Furthermore, the study examines the ongoing theoretical debate on whether an inverted U-shaped environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) exists between technological innovations (TI) in environment-related fields and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in China, using data from 1990 to 2020 and employing the threshold instrumental variable two-stage least-squares (Th-IV2SLS) model. The findings indicate that all the variables representing education contribute to reducing CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. The cost-effective levels of these variables to achieve CO<sub>2</sub> reduction are as follows: a 93% literacy rate index, 12% education expenditure as a percentage of GDP, and an average of 6 years of schooling. Furthermore, TI also contributes to CO<sub>2</sub> reduction, with a cost-effective level of 10.16% of TI. Educational variables promote GEG, with their respective cost-effective levels being 84% of the literacy rate index, 11.9% of education expenditure as a percentage of GDP, and an average of 5.5 years of schooling. In addition, TI promotes GEG, with a cost-effectiveness level of 10.4%. Moreover, there is a synergistic effect between education and TI that reduces CO<sub>2</sub> emissions; however, the synergy that promotes GEG is relatively weak. Based on these findings, policy recommendations are provided to enhance the effectiveness of education and TI in reducing CO<sub>2</sub> emissions and promoting GEG.</p>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122786","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study makes a significant contribution to China's ambitious goals of achieving carbon dioxide (CO2) neutrality and transitioning to green economic growth (GEG), and integrating the theoretical framework of the impact, population, affluence, and technology (IPAT) theory, with real-world application to reduce CO2 and promote GEG for sustainable development. Furthermore, the study examines the ongoing theoretical debate on whether an inverted U-shaped environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) exists between technological innovations (TI) in environment-related fields and CO2 emissions in China, using data from 1990 to 2020 and employing the threshold instrumental variable two-stage least-squares (Th-IV2SLS) model. The findings indicate that all the variables representing education contribute to reducing CO2 emissions. The cost-effective levels of these variables to achieve CO2 reduction are as follows: a 93% literacy rate index, 12% education expenditure as a percentage of GDP, and an average of 6 years of schooling. Furthermore, TI also contributes to CO2 reduction, with a cost-effective level of 10.16% of TI. Educational variables promote GEG, with their respective cost-effective levels being 84% of the literacy rate index, 11.9% of education expenditure as a percentage of GDP, and an average of 5.5 years of schooling. In addition, TI promotes GEG, with a cost-effectiveness level of 10.4%. Moreover, there is a synergistic effect between education and TI that reduces CO2 emissions; however, the synergy that promotes GEG is relatively weak. Based on these findings, policy recommendations are provided to enhance the effectiveness of education and TI in reducing CO2 emissions and promoting GEG.

中国在减少二氧化碳排放和促进绿色经济增长方面的教育和技术创新:边际效应和政策门槛分析。
本研究为中国实现二氧化碳(CO2)中和以及向绿色经济增长(GEG)转型的宏伟目标做出了重要贡献,并将影响、人口、富裕程度和技术(IPAT)理论框架与实际应用相结合,以减少二氧化碳排放和促进绿色经济增长,实现可持续发展。此外,本研究还利用 1990 年至 2020 年的数据,采用阈值工具变量两阶段最小二乘法(Th-IV2SLS)模型,探讨了目前理论界关于中国环境相关领域的技术创新(TI)与二氧化碳排放之间是否存在倒 U 型环境库兹涅茨曲线(EKC)的争论。研究结果表明,所有代表教育的变量都有助于减少二氧化碳排放。这些变量实现二氧化碳减排的成本效益水平如下:识字率指数为 93%,教育支出占 GDP 的百分比为 12%,平均受教育年限为 6 年。此外,技术指数也有助于减少二氧化碳排放量,其成本效益水平为技术指数的 10.16%。教育变量可促进全球环境治理,其成本效益水平分别为识字率指数的 84%、教育支出占 GDP 的 11.9%以及平均 5.5 年的受教育时间。此外,技术和创新促进了全球教育增长,其成本效益水平为 10.4%。此外,教育和技术与创新之间存在协同效应,可减少二氧化碳排放;但促进全球环境治理的协同效应相对较弱。基于这些发现,本文提出了政策建议,以提高教育和技术创新在减少二氧化碳排放和促进全球环境治理方面的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信