Development and validation of a lung cancer polygenic risk score incorporating susceptibility variants for risk factors.

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Zhimin Ma, Zhaopeng Zhu, Guanlian Pang, Feilong Gong, Jiaxin Gao, Wenjing Ge, Guoqing Wang, Mingxuan Zhu, Linnan Gong, Qiao Li, Chen Ji, Yating Fu, Chen Jin, Hongxia Ma, Yong Ji, Meng Zhu
{"title":"Development and validation of a lung cancer polygenic risk score incorporating susceptibility variants for risk factors.","authors":"Zhimin Ma, Zhaopeng Zhu, Guanlian Pang, Feilong Gong, Jiaxin Gao, Wenjing Ge, Guoqing Wang, Mingxuan Zhu, Linnan Gong, Qiao Li, Chen Ji, Yating Fu, Chen Jin, Hongxia Ma, Yong Ji, Meng Zhu","doi":"10.1002/ijc.35210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Incorporating susceptibility genetic variants of risk factors has been reported to enhance the risk prediction of polygenic risk score (PRS). However, it remains unclear whether this approach is effective for lung cancer. Hence, we aimed to construct a meta polygenic risk score (metaPRS) of lung cancer and assess its prediction of lung cancer risk and implication for risk stratification. Here, a total of 2180 genetic variants were used to develop nine PRSs for lung cancer, three PRSs for different histopathologic subtypes, and 17 PRSs for lung cancer-related risk factors, respectively. These PRSs were then integrated into a metaPRS for lung cancer using the elastic-net Cox regression model in the UK Biobank (N = 442,508). Furthermore, the predictive effects of the metaPRS were assessed in the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial (N = 108,665). The metaPRS was associated with lung cancer risk with a hazard ratio of 1.33 (95% confidence interval: 1.27-1.39) per standard deviation increased. The metaPRS showed the highest C-index (0.580) compared with the previous nine PRSs (C-index: 0.513-0.564) in PLCO. Besides, smokers in the intermediate risk group predicted by the clinical risk model (1.34%-1.51%) with the intermediate-high genetic risk had a 6-year average absolute lung cancer risk that exceeded the clinical risk model threshold (≥1.51%). The addition of metaPRS to the clinical risk model showed continuous net reclassification improvement (continuous NRI = 6.50%) in PLCO. These findings suggest the metaPRS can improve the predictive efficiency of lung cancer compared with the previous PRSs and refine risk stratification for lung cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":180,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.35210","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Incorporating susceptibility genetic variants of risk factors has been reported to enhance the risk prediction of polygenic risk score (PRS). However, it remains unclear whether this approach is effective for lung cancer. Hence, we aimed to construct a meta polygenic risk score (metaPRS) of lung cancer and assess its prediction of lung cancer risk and implication for risk stratification. Here, a total of 2180 genetic variants were used to develop nine PRSs for lung cancer, three PRSs for different histopathologic subtypes, and 17 PRSs for lung cancer-related risk factors, respectively. These PRSs were then integrated into a metaPRS for lung cancer using the elastic-net Cox regression model in the UK Biobank (N = 442,508). Furthermore, the predictive effects of the metaPRS were assessed in the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial (N = 108,665). The metaPRS was associated with lung cancer risk with a hazard ratio of 1.33 (95% confidence interval: 1.27-1.39) per standard deviation increased. The metaPRS showed the highest C-index (0.580) compared with the previous nine PRSs (C-index: 0.513-0.564) in PLCO. Besides, smokers in the intermediate risk group predicted by the clinical risk model (1.34%-1.51%) with the intermediate-high genetic risk had a 6-year average absolute lung cancer risk that exceeded the clinical risk model threshold (≥1.51%). The addition of metaPRS to the clinical risk model showed continuous net reclassification improvement (continuous NRI = 6.50%) in PLCO. These findings suggest the metaPRS can improve the predictive efficiency of lung cancer compared with the previous PRSs and refine risk stratification for lung cancer.

开发并验证肺癌多基因风险评分,其中包含风险因素的易感性变异。
据报道,纳入风险因素的易感基因变异可提高多基因风险评分(PRS)的风险预测能力。然而,这种方法对肺癌是否有效仍不清楚。因此,我们旨在构建肺癌的元多基因风险评分(metaPRS),并评估其对肺癌风险的预测和风险分层的意义。在此,我们利用总共 2180 个遗传变异分别建立了 9 个肺癌风险评分,3 个不同组织病理学亚型的风险评分,以及 17 个肺癌相关风险因素的风险评分。然后,在英国生物库(N = 442,508 人)中使用弹性网 Cox 回归模型将这些 PRS 整合为肺癌元 PRS。此外,还在前列腺癌、肺癌、结直肠癌和卵巢癌(PLCO)筛查试验(样本数=108,665)中评估了元PRS的预测效果。元PRS与肺癌风险相关,每增加一个标准差的危险比为1.33(95% 置信区间:1.27-1.39)。与 PLCO 的前九个 PRS(C 指数:0.513-0.564)相比,元 PRS 显示出最高的 C 指数(0.580)。此外,临床风险模型预测的中度风险组(1.34%-1.51%)中具有中度高遗传风险的吸烟者的 6 年平均绝对肺癌风险超过了临床风险模型的阈值(≥1.51%)。在临床风险模型中加入元PRS后,PLCO的净重新分类率持续提高(持续NRI=6.50%)。这些研究结果表明,与之前的PRS相比,元PRS可以提高肺癌的预测效率,并完善肺癌的风险分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
460
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Cancer (IJC) is the official journal of the Union for International Cancer Control—UICC; it appears twice a month. IJC invites submission of manuscripts under a broad scope of topics relevant to experimental and clinical cancer research and publishes original Research Articles and Short Reports under the following categories: -Cancer Epidemiology- Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics- Infectious Causes of Cancer- Innovative Tools and Methods- Molecular Cancer Biology- Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment- Tumor Markers and Signatures- Cancer Therapy and Prevention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信