Mourning and orienting to the future in a liminal occasion: (Re)defining British national identity after Queen Elizabeth II's death

IF 3.2 2区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL

British Journal of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1111/bjso.12807

Sandra Obradović, Nuria Martinez, Nandita Dhanda, Sidney Bode, Evangelos Ntontis, Mhairi Bowe, Stephen Reicher, Klara Jurstakova, Jazmin Kane, Sara Vestergren

{"title":"Mourning and orienting to the future in a liminal occasion: (Re)defining British national identity after Queen Elizabeth II's death","authors":"Sandra Obradović, Nuria Martinez, Nandita Dhanda, Sidney Bode, Evangelos Ntontis, Mhairi Bowe, Stephen Reicher, Klara Jurstakova, Jazmin Kane, Sara Vestergren","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we conceptualize the days of mourning that followed the passing of Queen Elizabeth II. as constituting a liminal occasion, a moment of in‐betweenness through which we can explore sense‐making in times of transition. How do people navigate through liminal occasions, and are they always transformative? Through a rapid response ethnography (Ninterviews = 64, Nparticipants = 122), we were able to capture the raw moments within which a collective comes together, as part of a national ritual, to transition from ‘here’ to ‘there’. In our data, liminality prompted participants to strategically define British national identity and its future by positioning the Queen as representative of Britishness, her loss as a national identity loss. No longer taken for granted, participants reasserted the value of the monarchy as an apolitical and unifying feature in an otherwise divided society, characterizing the continuity of the institution as an essential part of British identity and society. The analysis illustrates how liminality offers a useful conceptual tool for addressing how temporality and change are negotiated in relation to a shared identity, and how navigating transitional moments brings with it political implications for the future.","PeriodicalId":48304,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12807","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, we conceptualize the days of mourning that followed the passing of Queen Elizabeth II. as constituting a liminal occasion, a moment of in‐betweenness through which we can explore sense‐making in times of transition. How do people navigate through liminal occasions, and are they always transformative? Through a rapid response ethnography (Ninterviews = 64, Nparticipants = 122), we were able to capture the raw moments within which a collective comes together, as part of a national ritual, to transition from ‘here’ to ‘there’. In our data, liminality prompted participants to strategically define British national identity and its future by positioning the Queen as representative of Britishness, her loss as a national identity loss. No longer taken for granted, participants reasserted the value of the monarchy as an apolitical and unifying feature in an otherwise divided society, characterizing the continuity of the institution as an essential part of British identity and society. The analysis illustrates how liminality offers a useful conceptual tool for addressing how temporality and change are negotiated in relation to a shared identity, and how navigating transitional moments brings with it political implications for the future.

查看原文本刊更多论文

边缘时刻的哀悼和面向未来：伊丽莎白女王二世逝世后（重新）界定英国国家身份

在本文中，我们将英国女王伊丽莎白二世逝世后的哀悼日概念化为一种边缘场合，一种介于两者之间的时刻，我们可以通过它来探索过渡时期的意义建构。人们是如何度过边缘时刻的？通过快速反应人种学研究（访谈人数=64，参与者人数=122），我们捕捉到了一个集体作为国家仪式的一部分，从 "这里 "过渡到 "那里 "的原始时刻。在我们的数据中，边缘性促使参与者将女王定位为英国的代表，将女王的离去视为国家认同的丧失，从而战略性地定义英国的国家认同及其未来。参与者重申了君主制的价值，认为君主制是一个非政治性的、统一的特征，而不是一个分裂的社会，并将君主制的连续性描述为英国身份和社会的重要组成部分。该分析说明了边缘性如何提供了一个有用的概念工具，用于解决时间性和变化如何与共同身份相关的问题，以及如何在过渡时刻为未来带来政治影响。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

British Journal of Social Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-

CiteScore

9.50

自引率

7.40%

发文量

期刊介绍： The British Journal of Social Psychology publishes work from scholars based in all parts of the world, and manuscripts that present data on a wide range of populations inside and outside the UK. It publishes original papers in all areas of social psychology including: • social cognition • attitudes • group processes • social influence • intergroup relations • self and identity • nonverbal communication • social psychological aspects of personality, affect and emotion • language and discourse Submissions addressing these topics from a variety of approaches and methods, both quantitative and qualitative are welcomed. We publish papers of the following kinds: • empirical papers that address theoretical issues; • theoretical papers, including analyses of existing social psychological theories and presentations of theoretical innovations, extensions, or integrations; • review papers that provide an evaluation of work within a given area of social psychology and that present proposals for further research in that area; • methodological papers concerning issues that are particularly relevant to a wide range of social psychologists; • an invited agenda article as the first article in the first part of every volume. The editorial team aims to handle papers as efficiently as possible. In 2016, papers were triaged within less than a week, and the average turnaround time from receipt of the manuscript to first decision sent back to the authors was 47 days.