Progress in developing and operationalizing the Monitoring Framework of the Global Biodiversity Framework

IF 13.9 1区 生物学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Flavio Affinito, James M. Williams, Jillian E. Campbell, Maria C. Londono, Andrew Gonzalez
{"title":"Progress in developing and operationalizing the Monitoring Framework of the Global Biodiversity Framework","authors":"Flavio Affinito, James M. Williams, Jillian E. Campbell, Maria C. Londono, Andrew Gonzalez","doi":"10.1038/s41559-024-02566-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The failure to halt the global decline in biodiversity by 2020 contributed to the adoption of the ambitious Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, which includes transparency and responsibility as foundations. The Global Biodiversity Framework identifies the actions needed so that societies are living in harmony with nature by 2050. To support the delivery of this ambition, the transparency and responsibility mechanisms defined in the Global Biodiversity Framework include a detailed Monitoring Framework designed to prompt evidence-based actions and track progress towards its goals and targets at the national and global level. The Monitoring Framework includes a set of indicators selected by the Parties through a political process. These indicators have since been operationalized through a scientific process led by an expert group focused on assessing and clarifying their methods. Most indicators are now ready to inform on progress, but key limitations of data availability and methodological challenges remain. The onus is now on the Parties to resource implementation and on the scientific community to support indicator use and development. Implementation of the Monitoring Framework will provide an unprecedented view of the state of biodiversity at the national level, which can be used to assess both national and global progress. Investment to overcome the Monitoring Framework’s weaknesses will improve our ability to measure progress and mobilize the actions needed to protect and restore biodiversity and the many benefits we receive from nature.</p>","PeriodicalId":18835,"journal":{"name":"Nature ecology & evolution","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature ecology & evolution","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-024-02566-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The failure to halt the global decline in biodiversity by 2020 contributed to the adoption of the ambitious Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, which includes transparency and responsibility as foundations. The Global Biodiversity Framework identifies the actions needed so that societies are living in harmony with nature by 2050. To support the delivery of this ambition, the transparency and responsibility mechanisms defined in the Global Biodiversity Framework include a detailed Monitoring Framework designed to prompt evidence-based actions and track progress towards its goals and targets at the national and global level. The Monitoring Framework includes a set of indicators selected by the Parties through a political process. These indicators have since been operationalized through a scientific process led by an expert group focused on assessing and clarifying their methods. Most indicators are now ready to inform on progress, but key limitations of data availability and methodological challenges remain. The onus is now on the Parties to resource implementation and on the scientific community to support indicator use and development. Implementation of the Monitoring Framework will provide an unprecedented view of the state of biodiversity at the national level, which can be used to assess both national and global progress. Investment to overcome the Monitoring Framework’s weaknesses will improve our ability to measure progress and mobilize the actions needed to protect and restore biodiversity and the many benefits we receive from nature.

Abstract Image

制定和实施全球生物多样性框架监测框架的进展情况
由于未能在 2020 年之前阻止全球生物多样性的减少,因此通过了雄心勃勃的《昆明-蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架》,该框架以透明度和责任为基础。全球生物多样性框架确定了到 2050 年实现人与自然和谐相处所需的行动。为支持实现这一宏伟目标,《全球生物多样性框架》中定义的透明度和责任机制包括一个详细的监测框架,旨在促进基于证据的行动,并跟踪国家和全球层面实现其目标和指标的进展情况。监测框架包括一套由缔约方通过政治程序选定的指标。此后,这些指标在一个专家组的领导下,通过一个科学程序得到了落实,该专家组的工作重点是评估和澄清指标的方法。现在,大多数指标都可以用来通报进展情况,但数据可用性方面的主要限制和方法方面的挑战依然存在。现在,缔约方有责任为实施提供资源,科学界有责任为指标的使用和制定提供支持。监测框架的实施将为国家层面的生物多样性状况提供前所未有的视角,可用于评估国家和全球进展情况。为克服监测框架的弱点而进行的投资将提高我们衡量进展的能力,并动员必要的行动来保护和恢复生物多样性以及我们从大自然中获得的诸多益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nature ecology & evolution
Nature ecology & evolution Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
22.20
自引率
2.40%
发文量
282
期刊介绍: Nature Ecology & Evolution is interested in the full spectrum of ecological and evolutionary biology, encompassing approaches at the molecular, organismal, population, community and ecosystem levels, as well as relevant parts of the social sciences. Nature Ecology & Evolution provides a place where all researchers and policymakers interested in all aspects of life's diversity can come together to learn about the most accomplished and significant advances in the field and to discuss topical issues. An online-only monthly journal, our broad scope ensures that the research published reaches the widest possible audience of scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信