Olga Anczukow, Frédéric H.-T. Allain, Brittany L. Angarola, Douglas L. Black, Angela N. Brooks, Chonghui Cheng, Ana Conesa, Edie I. Crosse, Eduardo Eyras, Ernesto Guccione, Sydney X. Lu, Karla M. Neugebauer, Priyanka Sehgal, Xiao Song, Zuzana Tothova, Juan Valcárcel, Kevin M. Weeks, Gene W. Yeo, Andrei Thomas-Tikhonenko
{"title":"Steering research on mRNA splicing in cancer towards clinical translation","authors":"Olga Anczukow, Frédéric H.-T. Allain, Brittany L. Angarola, Douglas L. Black, Angela N. Brooks, Chonghui Cheng, Ana Conesa, Edie I. Crosse, Eduardo Eyras, Ernesto Guccione, Sydney X. Lu, Karla M. Neugebauer, Priyanka Sehgal, Xiao Song, Zuzana Tothova, Juan Valcárcel, Kevin M. Weeks, Gene W. Yeo, Andrei Thomas-Tikhonenko","doi":"10.1038/s41568-024-00750-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Splicing factors are affected by recurrent somatic mutations and copy number variations in several types of haematologic and solid malignancies, which is often seen as prima facie evidence that splicing aberrations can drive cancer initiation and progression. However, numerous spliceosome components also ‘moonlight’ in DNA repair and other cellular processes, making their precise role in cancer difficult to pinpoint. Still, few would deny that dysregulated mRNA splicing is a pervasive feature of most cancers. Correctly interpreting these molecular fingerprints can reveal novel tumour vulnerabilities and untapped therapeutic opportunities. Yet multiple technological challenges, lingering misconceptions, and outstanding questions hinder clinical translation. To start with, the general landscape of splicing aberrations in cancer is not well defined, due to limitations of short-read RNA sequencing not adept at resolving complete mRNA isoforms, as well as the shallow read depth inherent in long-read RNA-sequencing, especially at single-cell level. Although individual cancer-associated isoforms are known to contribute to cancer progression, widespread splicing alterations could be an equally important and, perhaps, more readily actionable feature of human cancers. This is to say that in addition to ‘repairing’ mis-spliced transcripts, possible therapeutic avenues include exacerbating splicing aberration with small-molecule spliceosome inhibitors, targeting recurrent splicing aberrations with synthetic lethal approaches, and training the immune system to recognize splicing-derived neoantigens. Although splicing factors are altered in cancer through mutations and copy number variations, their exact role remains challenging to define. In this Roadmap, Anczukow, Thomas-Tikhonenko and colleagues explore recent advances in splicing biology and provide guidance on leveraging these insights to facilitate the clinical application of compounds that target or exploit aberrant splicing patterns in cancer.","PeriodicalId":19055,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Cancer","volume":"24 12","pages":"887-905"},"PeriodicalIF":72.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41568-024-00750-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Splicing factors are affected by recurrent somatic mutations and copy number variations in several types of haematologic and solid malignancies, which is often seen as prima facie evidence that splicing aberrations can drive cancer initiation and progression. However, numerous spliceosome components also ‘moonlight’ in DNA repair and other cellular processes, making their precise role in cancer difficult to pinpoint. Still, few would deny that dysregulated mRNA splicing is a pervasive feature of most cancers. Correctly interpreting these molecular fingerprints can reveal novel tumour vulnerabilities and untapped therapeutic opportunities. Yet multiple technological challenges, lingering misconceptions, and outstanding questions hinder clinical translation. To start with, the general landscape of splicing aberrations in cancer is not well defined, due to limitations of short-read RNA sequencing not adept at resolving complete mRNA isoforms, as well as the shallow read depth inherent in long-read RNA-sequencing, especially at single-cell level. Although individual cancer-associated isoforms are known to contribute to cancer progression, widespread splicing alterations could be an equally important and, perhaps, more readily actionable feature of human cancers. This is to say that in addition to ‘repairing’ mis-spliced transcripts, possible therapeutic avenues include exacerbating splicing aberration with small-molecule spliceosome inhibitors, targeting recurrent splicing aberrations with synthetic lethal approaches, and training the immune system to recognize splicing-derived neoantigens. Although splicing factors are altered in cancer through mutations and copy number variations, their exact role remains challenging to define. In this Roadmap, Anczukow, Thomas-Tikhonenko and colleagues explore recent advances in splicing biology and provide guidance on leveraging these insights to facilitate the clinical application of compounds that target or exploit aberrant splicing patterns in cancer.
期刊介绍:
Nature Reviews Cancer, a part of the Nature Reviews portfolio of journals, aims to be the premier source of reviews and commentaries for the scientific communities it serves. The correct abbreviation for abstracting and indexing purposes is Nat. Rev. Cancer. The international standard serial numbers (ISSN) for Nature Reviews Cancer are 1474-175X (print) and 1474-1768 (online). Unlike other journals, Nature Reviews Cancer does not have an external editorial board. Instead, all editorial decisions are made by a team of full-time professional editors who are PhD-level scientists. The journal publishes Research Highlights, Comments, Reviews, and Perspectives relevant to cancer researchers, ensuring that the articles reach the widest possible audience due to their broad scope.