Natalia Drosu, Kjetil Bjornevik, Marianna Cortese, Michael Levy, Ludvig M. Sollid
{"title":"Coeliac disease as a model for understanding multiple sclerosis","authors":"Natalia Drosu, Kjetil Bjornevik, Marianna Cortese, Michael Levy, Ludvig M. Sollid","doi":"10.1038/s41582-024-01025-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The genetic architecture of multiple sclerosis (MS) is similar to that of coeliac disease, with human leukocyte antigen (HLA) being the greatest genetic determinant in both diseases. Furthermore, similar to the involvement of gluten in coeliac disease, Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) infection is now widely considered to be an important environmental factor in MS. The molecular basis for the HLA association in coeliac disease is well defined, and B cells have a clear role in antigen presentation to gluten-specific CD4+ T cells. By contrast, the mechanisms underlying the HLA association of MS are unknown but accumulating evidence indicates a similar role of B cells acting as antigen-presenting cells. The growing parallels suggest that much could be learned about the mechanisms of MS by using coeliac disease as a model. In this Perspective article, we discuss the insights that could be gained from these parallels and consider the possibility of antiviral treatment against EBV as a therapy for MS that is analogous to the gluten-free diet in coeliac disease. In this Perspective, the authors discuss how our understanding of coeliac disease could provide insights into the mechanisms of multiple sclerosis, the involvement of Epstein–Barr virus and the possibility of antiviral treatment against the virus as a therapy for multiple sclerosis.","PeriodicalId":19085,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":28.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41582-024-01025-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The genetic architecture of multiple sclerosis (MS) is similar to that of coeliac disease, with human leukocyte antigen (HLA) being the greatest genetic determinant in both diseases. Furthermore, similar to the involvement of gluten in coeliac disease, Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) infection is now widely considered to be an important environmental factor in MS. The molecular basis for the HLA association in coeliac disease is well defined, and B cells have a clear role in antigen presentation to gluten-specific CD4+ T cells. By contrast, the mechanisms underlying the HLA association of MS are unknown but accumulating evidence indicates a similar role of B cells acting as antigen-presenting cells. The growing parallels suggest that much could be learned about the mechanisms of MS by using coeliac disease as a model. In this Perspective article, we discuss the insights that could be gained from these parallels and consider the possibility of antiviral treatment against EBV as a therapy for MS that is analogous to the gluten-free diet in coeliac disease. In this Perspective, the authors discuss how our understanding of coeliac disease could provide insights into the mechanisms of multiple sclerosis, the involvement of Epstein–Barr virus and the possibility of antiviral treatment against the virus as a therapy for multiple sclerosis.
期刊介绍:
Nature Reviews Neurology aims to be the premier source of reviews and commentaries for the scientific and clinical communities we serve. We want to provide an unparalleled service to authors, referees, and readers, and we work hard to maximize the usefulness and impact of each article. The journal publishes Research Highlights, Comments, News & Views, Reviews, Consensus Statements, and Perspectives relevant to researchers and clinicians working in the field of neurology. Our broad scope ensures that the work we publish reaches the widest possible audience. Our articles are authoritative, accessible, and enhanced with clearly understandable figures, tables, and other display items. This page gives more detail about the aims and scope of the journal.