A Hypothesis-Driven, Near-Peer Physical Diagnosis Module on Streptococcal Pharyngitis Within the Pediatrics Clerkship.

Q3 Medicine
Lindsay Podraza, Lauren S Starnes, Kyle Langford, Logan Garfield, Allyson Metro, Alyssa Schlotman, Nicole Chambers, Maya Neeley
{"title":"A Hypothesis-Driven, Near-Peer Physical Diagnosis Module on Streptococcal Pharyngitis Within the Pediatrics Clerkship.","authors":"Lindsay Podraza, Lauren S Starnes, Kyle Langford, Logan Garfield, Allyson Metro, Alyssa Schlotman, Nicole Chambers, Maya Neeley","doi":"10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In busy clinical settings, there is limited time to teach physical examination (PE) and procedural skills, particularly when the traditional head-to-toe PE approach is time-consuming. Near-peer teaching of a more efficient approach, the hypothesis-driven PE (HDPE), increases students' learning opportunities. We developed a near-peer HDPE module to improve medical student confidence, knowledge, and skills for diagnosing and managing streptococcal pharyngitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>During this 1-hour module, residents taught the diagnostic approach for a patient with sore throat and facilitated small groups for practicing PE and throat swab skills. We assessed students using pre- and postmodule surveys including Likert-scale confidence scores (1 = <i>not at all confident</i>, 5= <i>extremely confident</i>), multiple-choice knowledge questions, and a skills rubric. A control group was surveyed at clerkship conclusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 71 pediatric clerkship students who participated, 69 (97%) completed premodule surveys and 65 (91%) completed skills assessments. Twenty-eight (39%) completed postmodule surveys and skill assessments. After participation, students' survey responses and rubrics indicated significant increase in confidence (<i>Mdn</i> <sub>pre</sub> = 2 [IQR = 1,2], <i>Mdn</i> <sub>post</sub> = 4 [IQR = 4,5]; <i>p</i> < .001), knowledge (<i>M</i> <sub>pre</sub> = 40%, <i>M</i> <sub>post</sub> = 77%; <i>p</i> < .001), and skills (<i>M</i> <sub>pre</sub> = 5.3, <i>M</i> <sub>post</sub> = 7.5; <i>p</i> < .01). Participating students also had significantly higher confidence (<i>p</i> < .005) and knowledge (<i>p</i> < 0.01) compared to the control group.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This near-peer HDPE module improved students' knowledge, confidence, and skills related to streptococcal pharyngitis diagnosis and management and achieved compliance for a required clerkship skill.</p>","PeriodicalId":36910,"journal":{"name":"MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources","volume":"20 ","pages":"11448"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11450068/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11448","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In busy clinical settings, there is limited time to teach physical examination (PE) and procedural skills, particularly when the traditional head-to-toe PE approach is time-consuming. Near-peer teaching of a more efficient approach, the hypothesis-driven PE (HDPE), increases students' learning opportunities. We developed a near-peer HDPE module to improve medical student confidence, knowledge, and skills for diagnosing and managing streptococcal pharyngitis.

Methods: During this 1-hour module, residents taught the diagnostic approach for a patient with sore throat and facilitated small groups for practicing PE and throat swab skills. We assessed students using pre- and postmodule surveys including Likert-scale confidence scores (1 = not at all confident, 5= extremely confident), multiple-choice knowledge questions, and a skills rubric. A control group was surveyed at clerkship conclusion.

Results: Of the 71 pediatric clerkship students who participated, 69 (97%) completed premodule surveys and 65 (91%) completed skills assessments. Twenty-eight (39%) completed postmodule surveys and skill assessments. After participation, students' survey responses and rubrics indicated significant increase in confidence (Mdn pre = 2 [IQR = 1,2], Mdn post = 4 [IQR = 4,5]; p < .001), knowledge (M pre = 40%, M post = 77%; p < .001), and skills (M pre = 5.3, M post = 7.5; p < .01). Participating students also had significantly higher confidence (p < .005) and knowledge (p < 0.01) compared to the control group.

Discussion: This near-peer HDPE module improved students' knowledge, confidence, and skills related to streptococcal pharyngitis diagnosis and management and achieved compliance for a required clerkship skill.

儿科实习中的链球菌性咽炎假说驱动、近距离物理诊断模块。
导言:在繁忙的临床环境中,教授体格检查(PE)和操作技能的时间非常有限,尤其是传统的从头到脚的体格检查方法非常耗时。近距离同伴教学是一种更有效的方法,即假设驱动式体格检查(HDPE),可增加学生的学习机会。我们开发了一个近距离同行 HDPE 模块,以提高医学生诊断和处理链球菌性咽炎的信心、知识和技能:在这个 1 小时的模块中,住院医师教授咽喉炎患者的诊断方法,并协助小组练习 PE 和咽拭子技能。我们通过模块前后的调查对学生进行了评估,包括李克特信心评分(1 分=完全没有信心,5 分=非常有信心)、多项选择知识问题和技能评分标准。在实习结束时对对照组进行了调查:在 71 名参加实习的儿科实习生中,69 人(97%)完成了实习前调查,65 人(91%)完成了技能评估。28人(39%)完成了课后调查和技能评估。参加培训后,学生的调查反馈和评分标准表明,他们的自信心(Mdn 前期 = 2 [IQR = 1,2],Mdn 后期 = 4 [IQR = 4,5];p < .001)、知识(M 前期 = 40%,M 后期 = 77%;p < .001)和技能(M 前期 = 5.3,M 后期 = 7.5;p < .01)均有显著提高。与对照组相比,参与学生的信心(p < .005)和知识(p < 0.01)也明显更高:这一近乎同侪的 HDPE 模块提高了学生与链球菌性咽炎诊断和处理相关的知识、信心和技能,并达到了实习技能要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
35 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信