Evaluation of Early Renal Changes in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Using Multiparametric MR Imaging.

Xinyi Chen, Chao Ge, Yuling Zhang, Yajie Ma, Yuling Zhang, Bei Li, Zhiqiang Chu, Qian Ji
{"title":"Evaluation of Early Renal Changes in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Using Multiparametric MR Imaging.","authors":"Xinyi Chen, Chao Ge, Yuling Zhang, Yajie Ma, Yuling Zhang, Bei Li, Zhiqiang Chu, Qian Ji","doi":"10.2463/mrms.mp.2023-0148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the clinical value of early renal changes in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) using multiparameter MRI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 41 diabetics (normoalbuminuria: n = 23; microalbuminuria: n = 18) and 30 healthy controls. All subjects underwent intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging (IVIM), blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) and arterial spin labeling (ASL) examinations. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare MRI parameters among the three groups. Pearson correlation analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between MRI parameters and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and albumin-creatinine ratio (ACR). Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were statistical differences in cortical D, D*, f, renal blood flow (RBF) and medulla D, D*, f, R2* among the three groups (P < 0.05). The cortical or medullary D, cortical f, and RBF were significantly positively correlated with eGFR (all P < 0.01). The cortical or medullary D, D*, f, cortical RBF were negatively correlated with ACR (all P < 0.05).To evaluate early kidney changes and degree of diabetes, cortical combined D and RBF (AUC [area under the curve]  = 0.796 and 0.947, respectively) was better than single D or RBF (all P > 0.05); medullary combined D and R2* (AUC = 0.899 and 0.923, respectively) was better than single D or R2* (all P > 0.05), except single D (P = 0.005) in differentiating normoalbuminuria group from control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The early changes of renal diffusion and perfusion, oxygenation level, and blood flow in T2DM could be evaluated noninvasively and quantitatively using IVIM, BOLD and ASL. Renal medullary combined IVIM-derived D and BOLD-derived R2* and cortical combined IVIM-derived D and ASL-derived RBF were better for evaluating early renal changes in T2DM.</p>","PeriodicalId":94126,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2023-0148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical value of early renal changes in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) using multiparameter MRI.

Methods: The study included 41 diabetics (normoalbuminuria: n = 23; microalbuminuria: n = 18) and 30 healthy controls. All subjects underwent intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging (IVIM), blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) and arterial spin labeling (ASL) examinations. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare MRI parameters among the three groups. Pearson correlation analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between MRI parameters and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and albumin-creatinine ratio (ACR). Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic performance.

Results: There were statistical differences in cortical D, D*, f, renal blood flow (RBF) and medulla D, D*, f, R2* among the three groups (P < 0.05). The cortical or medullary D, cortical f, and RBF were significantly positively correlated with eGFR (all P < 0.01). The cortical or medullary D, D*, f, cortical RBF were negatively correlated with ACR (all P < 0.05).To evaluate early kidney changes and degree of diabetes, cortical combined D and RBF (AUC [area under the curve]  = 0.796 and 0.947, respectively) was better than single D or RBF (all P > 0.05); medullary combined D and R2* (AUC = 0.899 and 0.923, respectively) was better than single D or R2* (all P > 0.05), except single D (P = 0.005) in differentiating normoalbuminuria group from control group.

Conclusion: The early changes of renal diffusion and perfusion, oxygenation level, and blood flow in T2DM could be evaluated noninvasively and quantitatively using IVIM, BOLD and ASL. Renal medullary combined IVIM-derived D and BOLD-derived R2* and cortical combined IVIM-derived D and ASL-derived RBF were better for evaluating early renal changes in T2DM.

利用多参数磁共振成像评估 2 型糖尿病早期肾脏变化
目的:使用多参数磁共振成像评估 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)早期肾脏变化的临床价值:研究对象包括 41 名糖尿病患者(正常白蛋白尿:23 人;微量白蛋白尿:18 人)和 30 名健康对照者。所有受试者均接受了体细胞内不连贯运动扩散加权成像(IVIM)、血氧水平依赖性(BOLD)和动脉自旋标记(ASL)检查。单因素方差分析用于比较三组患者的磁共振成像参数。采用皮尔逊相关分析评估核磁共振成像参数与估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)和白蛋白-肌酐比值(ACR)之间的关系。为评估诊断效果,还进行了受试者操作特征分析:三组间皮质D、D*、f、肾血流量(RBF)和髓质D、D*、f、R2*存在统计学差异(P 0.05);在区分正常白蛋白尿组和对照组方面,髓质联合D和R2*(AUC分别为0.899和0.923)优于单一D或R2*(均P > 0.05),但单一D除外(P = 0.005):结论:IVIM、BOLD 和 ASL 可以无创定量评估 T2DM 早期肾脏弥散和灌注、氧饱和度和血流量的变化。肾髓质联合 IVIM 导出 D 和 BOLD 导出 R2* 以及皮质联合 IVIM 导出 D 和 ASL 导出 RBF 更适合评估 T2DM 早期肾脏变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信