Phenology mediates direct and indirect interactions among co-occurring invasive plant species

IF 4.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Ecology Pub Date : 2024-10-06 DOI:10.1002/ecy.4446
Rachel A. Reeb, Sara E. Kuebbing
{"title":"Phenology mediates direct and indirect interactions among co-occurring invasive plant species","authors":"Rachel A. Reeb,&nbsp;Sara E. Kuebbing","doi":"10.1002/ecy.4446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Why nonnative invasive plant species commonly co-occur, despite their competitive superiority and propensity to displace native species, remains a paradox in invasion biology. Negative interactions among competitively dominant invaders are potentially alleviated by two understudied mechanisms: seasonal priority effects, where phenological separation weakens the effect of competition on species with early phenology; and indirect facilitation, where competition between two species is mitigated by a third species. Although phenological separation has been speculated as a mechanism for explaining co-occurrence patterns of invasive plants, it has never been directly tested. In a greenhouse experiment, we tested the effect of phenological separation on direct and indirect interactions between three co-occurring invasive plant species found in the riparian forests of North America. These species have distinct natural phenological separation with reproduction in early spring (<i>Ficaria verna</i>), mid-spring (<i>Alliaria petiolata</i>), and late summer (<i>Microstegium vimineum</i>). When phenology was experimentally synchronized, direct pairwise interactions among invasive species were overwhelmingly negative, asymmetric, and unlikely to promote co-occurrence. However, increasing phenological separation generated seasonal priority effects, which weakened the effect of competition on species with early phenology. Furthermore, the addition of a third species generated indirect facilitative effects, which balanced competitive outcomes among the two weakest competitors. Based on these findings, we conclude that phenological separation modulates the strength of both seasonal priority effects and indirect facilitation within species interaction networks and may promote the co-occurrence of three common invasive species within this study system. We articulate how future studies can test the external validity of these findings in more complex environmental conditions and with a larger range of invasive plants.</p>","PeriodicalId":11484,"journal":{"name":"Ecology","volume":"105 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecy.4446","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Why nonnative invasive plant species commonly co-occur, despite their competitive superiority and propensity to displace native species, remains a paradox in invasion biology. Negative interactions among competitively dominant invaders are potentially alleviated by two understudied mechanisms: seasonal priority effects, where phenological separation weakens the effect of competition on species with early phenology; and indirect facilitation, where competition between two species is mitigated by a third species. Although phenological separation has been speculated as a mechanism for explaining co-occurrence patterns of invasive plants, it has never been directly tested. In a greenhouse experiment, we tested the effect of phenological separation on direct and indirect interactions between three co-occurring invasive plant species found in the riparian forests of North America. These species have distinct natural phenological separation with reproduction in early spring (Ficaria verna), mid-spring (Alliaria petiolata), and late summer (Microstegium vimineum). When phenology was experimentally synchronized, direct pairwise interactions among invasive species were overwhelmingly negative, asymmetric, and unlikely to promote co-occurrence. However, increasing phenological separation generated seasonal priority effects, which weakened the effect of competition on species with early phenology. Furthermore, the addition of a third species generated indirect facilitative effects, which balanced competitive outcomes among the two weakest competitors. Based on these findings, we conclude that phenological separation modulates the strength of both seasonal priority effects and indirect facilitation within species interaction networks and may promote the co-occurrence of three common invasive species within this study system. We articulate how future studies can test the external validity of these findings in more complex environmental conditions and with a larger range of invasive plants.

物候介导了共生入侵植物物种之间的直接和间接相互作用。
尽管非本地入侵植物物种具有竞争优势并有取代本地物种的倾向,但为什么它们通常会共同出现,这仍然是入侵生物学中的一个悖论。具有竞争优势的入侵者之间的负面相互作用可能会通过两种未被充分研究的机制得到缓解:季节优先效应,即物候分离会削弱竞争对物候较早物种的影响;间接促进作用,即两个物种之间的竞争会通过第三个物种得到缓解。虽然物候分离被推测为一种解释入侵植物共生模式的机制,但它从未被直接测试过。在一项温室实验中,我们测试了物候分离对北美河岸森林中三种共生入侵植物物种之间直接和间接相互作用的影响。这些物种有明显的自然物候区隔,分别在早春(Ficaria verna)、仲春(Alliaria petiolata)和夏末(Microstegium vimineum)繁殖。在物候同步实验中,入侵物种之间的直接配对相互作用绝大多数是负的、不对称的,而且不太可能促进共生。然而,物候分离程度的增加会产生季节优先效应,从而削弱竞争对物候较早物种的影响。此外,第三个物种的加入产生了间接的促进效应,平衡了两个最弱竞争者之间的竞争结果。基于这些发现,我们得出结论,物候分离会调节物种相互作用网络中季节优先效应和间接促进效应的强度,并可能促进三种常见入侵物种在该研究系统中共同出现。我们阐明了未来的研究如何在更复杂的环境条件下,用更多的入侵植物来检验这些发现的外部有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecology
Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
332
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Ecology publishes articles that report on the basic elements of ecological research. Emphasis is placed on concise, clear articles documenting important ecological phenomena. The journal publishes a broad array of research that includes a rapidly expanding envelope of subject matter, techniques, approaches, and concepts: paleoecology through present-day phenomena; evolutionary, population, physiological, community, and ecosystem ecology, as well as biogeochemistry; inclusive of descriptive, comparative, experimental, mathematical, statistical, and interdisciplinary approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信