Using an integrated motor imagery and physical training intervention after knee injury: an interim analysis of the MOTIFS randomised controlled trial.

IF 3.9 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-02 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002064
Niklas Cederström, Gustav Nilsson, Rickard Dahan, Simon Granér, Eva Ageberg
{"title":"Using an integrated motor imagery and physical training intervention after knee injury: an interim analysis of the MOTIFS randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Niklas Cederström, Gustav Nilsson, Rickard Dahan, Simon Granér, Eva Ageberg","doi":"10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Physical function is often a main focus of knee injury rehabilitation, but recent recommendations include increasing attention to psychological factors. We have developed the MOTor Imagery to Facilitate Sensorimotor re-learning (MOTIFS) training model which integrates dynamic motor imagery into physical rehabilitation. The objective is to report interim analysis results of an adaptive randomised controlled trial regarding the pre-defined continuation criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following a 12-week intervention in which participants were randomised to either MOTIFS or Care-as-Usual training, n=42 people undergoing rehabilitation for a traumatic knee injury were assessed for change from baseline to follow-up in psychological readiness to return to activity, using the ACL Return to Sport after Injury Scale (ACL-RSI), and side hop limb symmetry index. Continuation criteria included differences of ≥5 points in ACL-RSI and ≥8 points in side hop limb symmetry index in favour of the MOTIFS group. If these were not met, ≥5 points change in enjoyment was acceptable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pre-defined continuation criteria were not met for ACL-RSI (mean difference -8.1 (SE 4.1)), side hop limb symmetry index (mean difference 4.4 (SE 7.8)), nor enjoyment (mean difference 3.9 (SE 4.5)), indicating that major modifications are required for continuation of the MOTIFS trial.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While results of this interim analysis did not show differences in psychological readiness to return to activity or side hop performance, previous research shows that the MOTIFS model is positive and enjoyable. Further research is warranted to evaluate more appropriate outcomes related to the holistic nature of physical and psychological readiness to return to activity.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT03473821.</p>","PeriodicalId":47417,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine","volume":"10 4","pages":"e002064"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11448119/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Physical function is often a main focus of knee injury rehabilitation, but recent recommendations include increasing attention to psychological factors. We have developed the MOTor Imagery to Facilitate Sensorimotor re-learning (MOTIFS) training model which integrates dynamic motor imagery into physical rehabilitation. The objective is to report interim analysis results of an adaptive randomised controlled trial regarding the pre-defined continuation criteria.

Methods: Following a 12-week intervention in which participants were randomised to either MOTIFS or Care-as-Usual training, n=42 people undergoing rehabilitation for a traumatic knee injury were assessed for change from baseline to follow-up in psychological readiness to return to activity, using the ACL Return to Sport after Injury Scale (ACL-RSI), and side hop limb symmetry index. Continuation criteria included differences of ≥5 points in ACL-RSI and ≥8 points in side hop limb symmetry index in favour of the MOTIFS group. If these were not met, ≥5 points change in enjoyment was acceptable.

Results: Pre-defined continuation criteria were not met for ACL-RSI (mean difference -8.1 (SE 4.1)), side hop limb symmetry index (mean difference 4.4 (SE 7.8)), nor enjoyment (mean difference 3.9 (SE 4.5)), indicating that major modifications are required for continuation of the MOTIFS trial.

Conclusion: While results of this interim analysis did not show differences in psychological readiness to return to activity or side hop performance, previous research shows that the MOTIFS model is positive and enjoyable. Further research is warranted to evaluate more appropriate outcomes related to the holistic nature of physical and psychological readiness to return to activity.

Trial registration number: NCT03473821.

膝关节损伤后使用综合运动想象和体能训练干预:MOTIFS 随机对照试验中期分析。
目的:身体功能通常是膝关节损伤康复的重点,但最近的建议也越来越关注心理因素。我们开发了促进感觉运动再学习的运动想象(MOTIFS)训练模型,将动态运动想象融入到身体康复中。我们的目的是报告一项适应性随机对照试验的中期分析结果,该试验涉及预定义的继续标准:方法:在为期12周的干预中,参与者被随机分配到MOTIFS或Care-as-Usual训练中,42名膝关节外伤康复者接受了基线到随访期间恢复活动心理准备的变化评估(使用前交叉韧带损伤后恢复运动量表(ACL-RSI)),以及侧跳肢体对称性指数。延续标准包括前交叉韧带损伤后运动恢复量表(ACL-RSI)和侧跳肢体对称性指数的差异≥5分,MOTIFS组的差异≥8分。如果未达到这些标准,则可接受≥5点的乐趣变化:结果:ACL-RSI(平均差值-8.1(SE 4.1))、侧跳肢体对称指数(平均差值4.4(SE 7.8))和愉悦度(平均差值3.9(SE 4.5))均未达到预先设定的继续标准,这表明继续进行MOTIFS试验需要进行重大修改:尽管此次中期分析的结果并未显示出恢复活动的心理准备程度或侧跳表现方面的差异,但之前的研究表明,MOTIFS 模式是积极和令人愉快的。有必要开展进一步研究,以评估与恢复活动的身体和心理准备的整体性相关的更合适的结果:试验注册号:NCT03473821。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
106
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信