Challenges in the practical implementation of blood biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease

IF 13.4 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Prof Michael Schöll PhD , Inge M W Verberk PhD , Marta del Campo PhD , Constance Delaby PhD , Joseph Therriault PhD , Joyce R Chong PhD , Sebastian Palmqvist PhD , Daniel Alcolea PhD
{"title":"Challenges in the practical implementation of blood biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease","authors":"Prof Michael Schöll PhD ,&nbsp;Inge M W Verberk PhD ,&nbsp;Marta del Campo PhD ,&nbsp;Constance Delaby PhD ,&nbsp;Joseph Therriault PhD ,&nbsp;Joyce R Chong PhD ,&nbsp;Sebastian Palmqvist PhD ,&nbsp;Daniel Alcolea PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.lanhl.2024.07.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Blood biomarkers have emerged as accessible, cost-effective, and highly promising tools for advancing the diagnostics of Alzheimer’s disease. However, transitioning from cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers to blood biomarkers—eg, to verify amyloid β pathology—requires careful consideration. This Series paper highlights the main challenges in the implementation of blood biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease in different possible contexts of use. Despite the robustness of measuring blood biomarker concentrations, the widespread adoption of blood biomarkers requires rigorous standardisation efforts to address inherent challenges in diverse contexts of use. The challenges include understanding the effect of pre-analytical and analytical conditions, potential confounding factors, and comorbidities that could influence outcomes of blood biomarkers and their use in diverse populations. Additionally, distinct scenarios present their own specific challenges. In memory clinics, the successful integration of blood biomarkers in diagnostic tests will require well-established diagnostic accuracy and comprehensive assessments of the effect of blood biomarkers on the diagnostic confidence and patient management of clinicians. In primary care settings, and even more when implemented in population-based screening programmes for which no experience with any biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease currently exists, the implementation of blood biomarkers will be challenged by the need for education of primary care clinical staff and clear guidelines. However, despite the challenges, blood biomarkers hold great promise for substantially enhancing the diagnostic accuracy and effectively streamlining referral processes, leading to earlier diagnosis and access to treatments. The ongoing efforts that are shaping the integration of blood biomarkers across diverse clinical settings pave the way towards precision medicine in Alzheimer’s disease.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34394,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","volume":"5 10","pages":"Article 100630"},"PeriodicalIF":13.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Healthy Longevity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266675682400148X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Blood biomarkers have emerged as accessible, cost-effective, and highly promising tools for advancing the diagnostics of Alzheimer’s disease. However, transitioning from cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers to blood biomarkers—eg, to verify amyloid β pathology—requires careful consideration. This Series paper highlights the main challenges in the implementation of blood biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease in different possible contexts of use. Despite the robustness of measuring blood biomarker concentrations, the widespread adoption of blood biomarkers requires rigorous standardisation efforts to address inherent challenges in diverse contexts of use. The challenges include understanding the effect of pre-analytical and analytical conditions, potential confounding factors, and comorbidities that could influence outcomes of blood biomarkers and their use in diverse populations. Additionally, distinct scenarios present their own specific challenges. In memory clinics, the successful integration of blood biomarkers in diagnostic tests will require well-established diagnostic accuracy and comprehensive assessments of the effect of blood biomarkers on the diagnostic confidence and patient management of clinicians. In primary care settings, and even more when implemented in population-based screening programmes for which no experience with any biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease currently exists, the implementation of blood biomarkers will be challenged by the need for education of primary care clinical staff and clear guidelines. However, despite the challenges, blood biomarkers hold great promise for substantially enhancing the diagnostic accuracy and effectively streamlining referral processes, leading to earlier diagnosis and access to treatments. The ongoing efforts that are shaping the integration of blood biomarkers across diverse clinical settings pave the way towards precision medicine in Alzheimer’s disease.
实际应用阿尔茨海默病血液生物标志物所面临的挑战。
血液生物标志物已成为可获得的、具有成本效益的、极有希望推动阿尔茨海默病诊断的工具。然而,从脑脊液生物标记物过渡到血液生物标记物--例如,用于验证淀粉样β病理学--需要慎重考虑。这篇系列论文强调了在不同可能的使用环境中实施阿尔茨海默病血液生物标志物所面临的主要挑战。尽管血液生物标记物浓度的测量具有稳健性,但血液生物标记物的广泛采用需要严格的标准化工作,以应对不同使用环境中固有的挑战。这些挑战包括了解分析前和分析条件、潜在混杂因素以及合并症的影响,这些因素可能会影响血液生物标志物的结果及其在不同人群中的使用。此外,不同的情况也会带来各自特定的挑战。在记忆诊所,要成功地将血液生物标记物整合到诊断检测中,就必须确立良好的诊断准确性,并全面评估血液生物标记物对临床医生诊断信心和患者管理的影响。在基层医疗机构,尤其是在目前还没有任何阿尔茨海默病生物标志物经验的人群筛查计划中实施时,血液生物标志物的实施将面临挑战,因为需要对基层医疗机构的临床人员进行教育并制定明确的指导方针。不过,尽管存在这些挑战,血液生物标记物仍有很大的潜力,可大幅提高诊断准确性并有效简化转诊流程,从而更早地做出诊断和获得治疗。血液生物标志物在不同临床环境中的不断应用,为阿尔茨海默病的精准医疗铺平了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lancet Healthy Longevity
Lancet Healthy Longevity GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
2.30%
发文量
192
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Healthy Longevity, a gold open-access journal, focuses on clinically-relevant longevity and healthy aging research. It covers early-stage clinical research on aging mechanisms, epidemiological studies, and societal research on changing populations. The journal includes clinical trials across disciplines, particularly in gerontology and age-specific clinical guidelines. In line with the Lancet family tradition, it advocates for the rights of all to healthy lives, emphasizing original research likely to impact clinical practice or thinking. Clinical and policy reviews also contribute to shaping the discourse in this rapidly growing discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信