Relative effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccine booster doses in people aged 65 and older-a retrospective cohort study in Türkiye.

Q2 Medicine
Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy Pub Date : 2024-09-27 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/25151355241285375
Mehmet Akif Sezerol, Alican Sarisaltik
{"title":"Relative effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccine booster doses in people aged 65 and older-a retrospective cohort study in Türkiye.","authors":"Mehmet Akif Sezerol, Alican Sarisaltik","doi":"10.1177/25151355241285375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immunization in the elderly population is critical due to the high frequency of health outcomes related to COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare the effectiveness levels of COVID-19 vaccine schedules in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection in the older adult group who received at least one booster dose.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study evaluated 8969 adults aged 65 and over in the Sultanbeyli district of İstanbul. COVID-19 vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction testing data between January 14, 2021 and December 2, 2022 were obtained from the National Public Health Management System.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age of participants was 71 years. The vaccines were mostly administered as CoronaVac for the first and second doses (81.4% and 82.2%, respectively) and BNT162b2 for the third and fourth doses (61.8% and 73.1%, respectively). Turkovac was administered only in booster doses (third dose 0.6%, fourth dose 4.8%). The adjusted relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) was found to be 61.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) 51.5-69.9) in two doses of inactivated vaccine and one dose of mRNA vaccine schedule compared to the homolog booster of CoronaVac primary vaccine schedule. In two booster doses receipts, the adjusted rVE was found to be 45.4% (95% CI 13.8-65.4) in three doses of inactivated and one dose mRNA vaccine schedule and 43.0% (95% CI 20.5-59.2) in two doses of inactivated and two doses of mRNA vaccines schedule compared to the two homolog boosters with CoronaVac primary vaccine schedule.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, the effectiveness of the mRNA vaccine as a booster dose was higher than that of the homologous boosters in participants receiving the CoronaVac primary series for those aged 65 and over.</p>","PeriodicalId":33285,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy","volume":"12 ","pages":"25151355241285375"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11452850/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25151355241285375","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Immunization in the elderly population is critical due to the high frequency of health outcomes related to COVID-19.

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness levels of COVID-19 vaccine schedules in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection in the older adult group who received at least one booster dose.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Methods: This study evaluated 8969 adults aged 65 and over in the Sultanbeyli district of İstanbul. COVID-19 vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction testing data between January 14, 2021 and December 2, 2022 were obtained from the National Public Health Management System.

Results: The median age of participants was 71 years. The vaccines were mostly administered as CoronaVac for the first and second doses (81.4% and 82.2%, respectively) and BNT162b2 for the third and fourth doses (61.8% and 73.1%, respectively). Turkovac was administered only in booster doses (third dose 0.6%, fourth dose 4.8%). The adjusted relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) was found to be 61.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) 51.5-69.9) in two doses of inactivated vaccine and one dose of mRNA vaccine schedule compared to the homolog booster of CoronaVac primary vaccine schedule. In two booster doses receipts, the adjusted rVE was found to be 45.4% (95% CI 13.8-65.4) in three doses of inactivated and one dose mRNA vaccine schedule and 43.0% (95% CI 20.5-59.2) in two doses of inactivated and two doses of mRNA vaccines schedule compared to the two homolog boosters with CoronaVac primary vaccine schedule.

Conclusion: In this study, the effectiveness of the mRNA vaccine as a booster dose was higher than that of the homologous boosters in participants receiving the CoronaVac primary series for those aged 65 and over.

65 岁及以上人群接种 COVID-19 疫苗加强剂量的相对有效性--土耳其回顾性队列研究。
背景:由于与 COVID-19 相关的健康后果发生率高,因此老年人群的免疫接种至关重要:由于与 COVID-19 相关的健康后果发生频率较高,因此老年人群的免疫接种至关重要:本研究旨在比较至少接种过一次COVID-19疫苗的老年人群在预防SARS-CoV-2感染方面的有效性:设计:回顾性队列研究:这项研究对伊斯坦布尔苏丹贝利区8969名65岁及以上的成年人进行了评估。2021年1月14日至2022年12月2日期间的COVID-19疫苗接种和SARS-CoV-2聚合酶链反应检测数据来自国家公共卫生管理系统:结果:参与者的中位年龄为 71 岁。第一剂和第二剂疫苗大多接种的是 CoronaVac(分别为 81.4% 和 82.2%),第三剂和第四剂疫苗接种的是 BNT162b2(分别为 61.8% 和 73.1%)。Turkovac仅在加强剂量中接种(第三剂0.6%,第四剂4.8%)。与 CoronaVac 主要疫苗的同源强化剂相比,两剂灭活疫苗和一剂 mRNA 疫苗的调整后相对疫苗效力 (rVE) 为 61.8%(95% 置信区间 (CI):51.5-69.9)。在两剂强化剂接种中,与 CoronaVac 主疫苗接种程序的两剂同源强化剂相比,三剂灭活疫苗和一剂 mRNA 疫苗程序的调整 rVE 为 45.4%(95% CI 13.8-65.4),两剂灭活疫苗和两剂 mRNA 疫苗程序的调整 rVE 为 43.0%(95% CI 20.5-59.2):在这项研究中,对于接种CoronaVac初级系列疫苗的65岁及以上人群,mRNA疫苗作为加强剂的有效性高于同源加强剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy
Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信