Effect of intraoperative injection of esketamine on postoperative analgesia and postoperative rehabilitation after cesarean section.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Hong-Zhuan Chen, Yi Gao, Ke-Ke Li, Li An, Jing Yan, Hong Li, Jin Zhang
{"title":"Effect of intraoperative injection of esketamine on postoperative analgesia and postoperative rehabilitation after cesarean section.","authors":"Hong-Zhuan Chen, Yi Gao, Ke-Ke Li, Li An, Jing Yan, Hong Li, Jin Zhang","doi":"10.12998/wjcc.v12.i28.6195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Following cesarean section, a significant number of women encounter moderate to severe pain. Inadequate management of acute pain post-cesarean section can have far-reaching implications, adversely impacting maternal emotional well-being, daily activities, breastfeeding, and neonatal care. It may also impede maternal organ function recovery, leading to escalated opioid usage, heightened risk of postpartum depression, and the development of chronic postoperative pain. Both the Chinese Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guidelines and the American ERAS Society guidelines consistently advocate for the adoption of multimodal analgesia protocols in post-cesarean section pain management. Esketamine, functioning as an antagonist of the N-Methyl-D-Aspartate receptor, has been validated for pain management in surgical patients and has exhibited effectiveness in depression treatment. Research has suggested that incorporating esketamine into postoperative pain management <i>via</i> pain pumps can lead to improvements in short-term depression and pain outcomes. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of administering a single dose of esketamine during cesarean section.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the effect of intraoperative injection of esketamine on postoperative analgesia and postoperative rehabilitation after cesarean section.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 315 women undergoing elective cesarean section under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia were randomized into three groups: low-dose esketamine (0.15 mg/kg), high-dose esketamine (0.25 mg/kg), and control (saline). Postoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores were recorded at 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, and 48 hours. Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) scores were noted on 2 days, 7 days and 42 days. Ramsay sedation scores were assessed at specified intervals post-injection. Postoperative adverse reactions were also recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Low-dose group and high-dose group compared to control group, had significantly lower postoperative VAS pain scores at 6 hours 12 hours, and 24 hours (<i>P</i> < 0.05), with reduced analgesic usage (<i>P</i> < 0.05). EPDS scores and postpartum depression rates were significantly lower on 2 days and 7 days (<i>P</i> < 0.05). No significant differences in first exhaust and defecation times were observed (<i>P</i> > 0.05), but ambulation times were shorter (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Ramsay scores were higher at 5 minutes, 15 minutes, and upon room exit (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Low-dose group and high-dose group had higher incidences of hallucination, lethargy, and diplopia within 2 hours (<i>P</i> < 0.05), and with low-dose group had lower incidences of hallucination, lethargy, and diplopia than high-dose group (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Esketamine enhances analgesia and postpartum recovery; a 0.15 mg/kg dose is optimal for cesarean sections, balancing efficacy with minimized adverse effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":23912,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Clinical Cases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11362894/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Clinical Cases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v12.i28.6195","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Following cesarean section, a significant number of women encounter moderate to severe pain. Inadequate management of acute pain post-cesarean section can have far-reaching implications, adversely impacting maternal emotional well-being, daily activities, breastfeeding, and neonatal care. It may also impede maternal organ function recovery, leading to escalated opioid usage, heightened risk of postpartum depression, and the development of chronic postoperative pain. Both the Chinese Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guidelines and the American ERAS Society guidelines consistently advocate for the adoption of multimodal analgesia protocols in post-cesarean section pain management. Esketamine, functioning as an antagonist of the N-Methyl-D-Aspartate receptor, has been validated for pain management in surgical patients and has exhibited effectiveness in depression treatment. Research has suggested that incorporating esketamine into postoperative pain management via pain pumps can lead to improvements in short-term depression and pain outcomes. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of administering a single dose of esketamine during cesarean section.

Aim: To investigate the effect of intraoperative injection of esketamine on postoperative analgesia and postoperative rehabilitation after cesarean section.

Methods: A total of 315 women undergoing elective cesarean section under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia were randomized into three groups: low-dose esketamine (0.15 mg/kg), high-dose esketamine (0.25 mg/kg), and control (saline). Postoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores were recorded at 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, and 48 hours. Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) scores were noted on 2 days, 7 days and 42 days. Ramsay sedation scores were assessed at specified intervals post-injection. Postoperative adverse reactions were also recorded.

Results: Low-dose group and high-dose group compared to control group, had significantly lower postoperative VAS pain scores at 6 hours 12 hours, and 24 hours (P < 0.05), with reduced analgesic usage (P < 0.05). EPDS scores and postpartum depression rates were significantly lower on 2 days and 7 days (P < 0.05). No significant differences in first exhaust and defecation times were observed (P > 0.05), but ambulation times were shorter (P < 0.05). Ramsay scores were higher at 5 minutes, 15 minutes, and upon room exit (P < 0.05). Low-dose group and high-dose group had higher incidences of hallucination, lethargy, and diplopia within 2 hours (P < 0.05), and with low-dose group had lower incidences of hallucination, lethargy, and diplopia than high-dose group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Esketamine enhances analgesia and postpartum recovery; a 0.15 mg/kg dose is optimal for cesarean sections, balancing efficacy with minimized adverse effects.

术中注射艾司卡胺对剖腹产术后镇痛和术后康复的影响。
背景:剖宫产术后,很多产妇都会遇到中度到重度疼痛。剖腹产后急性疼痛处理不当会产生深远影响,对产妇的情绪稳定、日常活动、母乳喂养和新生儿护理产生不利影响。它还可能阻碍产妇器官功能的恢复,导致阿片类药物用量增加、产后抑郁风险增加以及术后慢性疼痛的发展。中国术后恢复指南(ERAS)和美国ERAS协会指南都一直倡导在剖宫产术后疼痛治疗中采用多模式镇痛方案。作为 N-甲基-D-天门冬氨酸受体的拮抗剂,艾司卡明已被证实可用于手术患者的疼痛治疗,并在抑郁症治疗中显示出疗效。研究表明,通过镇痛泵将艾司氯胺酮纳入术后疼痛治疗中,可在短期内改善抑郁和疼痛的治疗效果。本研究旨在评估在剖宫产术中注射单剂量艾司氯胺酮的有效性和安全性。目的:研究术中注射艾司氯胺酮对剖宫产术后镇痛和术后康复的影响:方法:将315名在脊柱硬膜外联合麻醉下接受择期剖宫产手术的产妇随机分为三组:低剂量埃斯卡胺(0.15 mg/kg)组、高剂量埃斯卡胺(0.25 mg/kg)组和对照组(生理盐水)。记录术后 6 小时、12 小时、24 小时和 48 小时的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分。爱丁堡产后抑郁量表(EPDS)评分分别记录于术后 2 天、7 天和 42 天。在注射后的特定时间间隔评估拉姆塞镇静评分。此外,还记录了术后不良反应:结果:低剂量组和高剂量组与对照组相比,术后 6 小时、12 小时和 24 小时的 VAS 疼痛评分明显降低(P < 0.05),镇痛剂用量减少(P < 0.05)。EPDS 评分和产后抑郁率在 2 天和 7 天明显降低(P < 0.05)。首次排气和排便时间无明显差异(P > 0.05),但行走时间较短(P < 0.05)。5分钟、15分钟和离开房间时的拉姆塞评分更高(P < 0.05)。低剂量组和高剂量组在2小时内的幻觉、嗜睡和复视发生率较高(P < 0.05),而低剂量组的幻觉、嗜睡和复视发生率低于高剂量组(P < 0.05):结论:依斯西塔明能增强镇痛和产后恢复;0.15 毫克/千克的剂量是剖宫产手术的最佳剂量,既能兼顾疗效,又能将不良反应降至最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Clinical Cases
World Journal of Clinical Cases Medicine-General Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3384
期刊介绍: The World Journal of Clinical Cases (WJCC) is a high-quality, peer reviewed, open-access journal. The primary task of WJCC is to rapidly publish high-quality original articles, reviews, editorials, and case reports in the field of clinical cases. In order to promote productive academic communication, the peer review process for the WJCC is transparent; to this end, all published manuscripts are accompanied by the anonymized reviewers’ comments as well as the authors’ responses. The primary aims of the WJCC are to improve diagnostic, therapeutic and preventive modalities and the skills of clinicians and to guide clinical practice in clinical cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信