Efficacy and safety of linaclotide in treatment-resistant chronic constipation: A multicenter, open-label study.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurogastroenterology and Motility Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-06 DOI:10.1111/nmo.14938
Tsutomu Yoshihara, Takaomi Kessoku, Tomohiro Takatsu, Noboru Misawa, Keiichi Ashikari, Akiko Fuyuki, Hidenori Ohkubo, Takuma Higurashi, Michihiro Iwaki, Takeo Kurihashi, Machiko Nakatogawa, Koji Yamamoto, Izuru Terada, Yusuke Tanaka, Masataka Morita, Atsushi Nakajima
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of linaclotide in treatment-resistant chronic constipation: A multicenter, open-label study.","authors":"Tsutomu Yoshihara, Takaomi Kessoku, Tomohiro Takatsu, Noboru Misawa, Keiichi Ashikari, Akiko Fuyuki, Hidenori Ohkubo, Takuma Higurashi, Michihiro Iwaki, Takeo Kurihashi, Machiko Nakatogawa, Koji Yamamoto, Izuru Terada, Yusuke Tanaka, Masataka Morita, Atsushi Nakajima","doi":"10.1111/nmo.14938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of linaclotide in patients with chronic constipation (CC) or irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C) who did not respond to treatment with magnesium oxide (MgO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was designed as a multicenter, open-label, single-arm, exploratory study. Patients with CC or IBS-C who took MgO and those meeting the medication initiation criteria were administered linaclotide at a daily dosage of 500 μg for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was a change in the Japanese version of the Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life (JPAC-QOL) score from baseline, which was evaluated by using a paired t-test.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>The patients' mean age (± standard deviation) was 67.6 ± 13.82 years. The full analysis set included 61 patients. The JPAC-QOL total score was 1.60 at baseline and 0.70 at 12 weeks, with a significant mean change of -0.89 ± 0.721 (p < 0.001). Several secondary endpoints also showed improvement. The frequency of spontaneous bowel movement (SBM) and complete SBM increased by 2.70 ± 7.254 (p < 0.01) and 2.81 ± 5.254 times, respectively (p < 0.001). The Bristol Stool Form Scale, abdominal bloating severity, and straining severity scores improved by 1.33 ± 1.274 (p < 0.001), -0.16 ± 0.563 (p < 0.05), and -0.46 ± 0.795 (p < 0.001) points, respectively. The safety analysis set included 65 patients, 7 of whom had diarrhea, which improved with dose reduction and drug withdrawal.</p><p><strong>Conclusion & inferences: </strong>The study was conducted in an older adult population, similar to real clinical practice. Linaclotide may be an option for treating CC that shows an inadequate response to conventional therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19123,"journal":{"name":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","volume":" ","pages":"e14938"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14938","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of linaclotide in patients with chronic constipation (CC) or irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C) who did not respond to treatment with magnesium oxide (MgO).

Methods: This study was designed as a multicenter, open-label, single-arm, exploratory study. Patients with CC or IBS-C who took MgO and those meeting the medication initiation criteria were administered linaclotide at a daily dosage of 500 μg for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was a change in the Japanese version of the Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life (JPAC-QOL) score from baseline, which was evaluated by using a paired t-test.

Key results: The patients' mean age (± standard deviation) was 67.6 ± 13.82 years. The full analysis set included 61 patients. The JPAC-QOL total score was 1.60 at baseline and 0.70 at 12 weeks, with a significant mean change of -0.89 ± 0.721 (p < 0.001). Several secondary endpoints also showed improvement. The frequency of spontaneous bowel movement (SBM) and complete SBM increased by 2.70 ± 7.254 (p < 0.01) and 2.81 ± 5.254 times, respectively (p < 0.001). The Bristol Stool Form Scale, abdominal bloating severity, and straining severity scores improved by 1.33 ± 1.274 (p < 0.001), -0.16 ± 0.563 (p < 0.05), and -0.46 ± 0.795 (p < 0.001) points, respectively. The safety analysis set included 65 patients, 7 of whom had diarrhea, which improved with dose reduction and drug withdrawal.

Conclusion & inferences: The study was conducted in an older adult population, similar to real clinical practice. Linaclotide may be an option for treating CC that shows an inadequate response to conventional therapy.

利那洛肽治疗耐药性慢性便秘的有效性和安全性:一项多中心、开放标签研究。
研究背景本研究旨在评估利那洛肽对使用氧化镁(MgO)治疗无效的慢性便秘(CC)或伴便秘的肠易激综合征(IBS-C)患者的疗效和安全性:本研究是一项多中心、开放标签、单臂、探索性研究。服用过氧化镁的CC或IBS-C患者以及符合药物治疗起始标准的患者均接受了利那洛肽治疗,每日剂量为500微克,为期12周。主要研究终点为日文版便秘患者生活质量评估(JPAC-QOL)评分与基线相比的变化,采用配对t检验进行评估:主要结果:患者的平均年龄(± 标准差)为 67.6±13.82 岁。完整的分析集包括 61 名患者。JPAC-QOL 总分在基线时为 1.60,12 周时为 0.70,平均变化显著为 -0.89 ± 0.721(p 结论与推论:该研究在老年人群中进行,与实际临床实践相似。利那洛肽可能是治疗对常规疗法反应不佳的CC的一种选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurogastroenterology and Motility
Neurogastroenterology and Motility 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.60%
发文量
178
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurogastroenterology & Motility (NMO) is the official Journal of the European Society of Neurogastroenterology & Motility (ESNM) and the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society (ANMS). It is edited by James Galligan, Albert Bredenoord, and Stephen Vanner. The editorial and peer review process is independent of the societies affiliated to the journal and publisher: Neither the ANMS, the ESNM or the Publisher have editorial decision-making power. Whenever these are relevant to the content being considered or published, the editors, journal management committee and editorial board declare their interests and affiliations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信