Layer-specific BOLD effects in gradient and spin-echo acquisitions in somatosensory cortex.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-07 DOI:10.1002/mrm.30326
Zhangyan Yang, Mishra Arabinda, Feng Wang, Li Min Chen, John C Gore
{"title":"Layer-specific BOLD effects in gradient and spin-echo acquisitions in somatosensory cortex.","authors":"Zhangyan Yang, Mishra Arabinda, Feng Wang, Li Min Chen, John C Gore","doi":"10.1002/mrm.30326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Previous studies have shown varied BOLD signals with gradient echo (GE) across cortical depth. To interpret these variations, and understand the effects of vascular geometry and size, the magnitudes and layer distributions of GE and spin-echo (SE) BOLD functional MRI signals were compared in the somatosensory cortex of squirrel monkeys during tactile stimulation and in a resting state at high spatial resolution and high field.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A block-design stimulation was used to identify tactile-evoked activation signals in somatosensory Areas 3b and 1. Layer-specific connectivities were calculated using resting-state data. Signal power spectra were compared by depth and pulse sequence. The measured ratios of transverse relaxation rate changes were compared with Anderson and Weiss's model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SE signals showed a 26% lower percentage signal change during tactile stimulation compared with GE, along with a slower time course. SE signals remained consistent but weaker in lower layers, whereas GE signals decreased with cortical depth. This pattern extended to resting-state power spectra. Resting-state functional connectivity indicated larger connectivity between the top layers of Area 3b and Area 1 for GE, with minimal changes for SE. Comparisons with theory suggest vessel diameters ranging from 19.4 to 9 microns are responsible for BOLD effects across cortical layers at 9.4 T.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results provide further evidence that at high field, SE BOLD signals are relatively free of contributions from sources other than microvascular changes in response to neural activity, whereas GE signals, even in the superficial layers, are not dominated by very large vessels.</p>","PeriodicalId":18065,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1314-1328"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11680728/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.30326","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Previous studies have shown varied BOLD signals with gradient echo (GE) across cortical depth. To interpret these variations, and understand the effects of vascular geometry and size, the magnitudes and layer distributions of GE and spin-echo (SE) BOLD functional MRI signals were compared in the somatosensory cortex of squirrel monkeys during tactile stimulation and in a resting state at high spatial resolution and high field.

Methods: A block-design stimulation was used to identify tactile-evoked activation signals in somatosensory Areas 3b and 1. Layer-specific connectivities were calculated using resting-state data. Signal power spectra were compared by depth and pulse sequence. The measured ratios of transverse relaxation rate changes were compared with Anderson and Weiss's model.

Results: SE signals showed a 26% lower percentage signal change during tactile stimulation compared with GE, along with a slower time course. SE signals remained consistent but weaker in lower layers, whereas GE signals decreased with cortical depth. This pattern extended to resting-state power spectra. Resting-state functional connectivity indicated larger connectivity between the top layers of Area 3b and Area 1 for GE, with minimal changes for SE. Comparisons with theory suggest vessel diameters ranging from 19.4 to 9 microns are responsible for BOLD effects across cortical layers at 9.4 T.

Conclusion: These results provide further evidence that at high field, SE BOLD signals are relatively free of contributions from sources other than microvascular changes in response to neural activity, whereas GE signals, even in the superficial layers, are not dominated by very large vessels.

躯体感觉皮层梯度和自旋回波采集中的特定层BOLD效应
目的:以往的研究表明,梯度回波(GE)BOLD 信号在不同皮层深度存在差异。为了解释这些变化并了解血管几何形状和大小的影响,研究人员在高空间分辨率和高场条件下比较了松鼠猴躯体感觉皮层在触觉刺激时和静止状态下 GE 和自旋回波(SE)BOLD 功能 MRI 信号的大小和层分布:方法:采用分块设计刺激来识别躯体感觉区 3b 和 1 的触觉诱发激活信号。信号功率谱按深度和脉冲序列进行比较。测得的横向松弛率变化比率与安德森和韦斯的模型进行了比较:结果:与 GE 相比,SE 信号在触觉刺激过程中的信号变化百分比低 26%,且时间进程较慢。SE 信号保持一致,但在低层较弱,而 GE 信号随着皮层深度的增加而减弱。这种模式延伸到静息态功率谱。静息态功能连通性表明,GE 信号在 3b 区顶层和 1 区之间的连通性更大,而 SE 信号的变化极小。与理论的比较表明,血管直径从 19.4 微米到 9 微米不等,是 9.4 T 时各皮层 BOLD 效应的原因:这些结果进一步证明,在高场条件下,SE BOLD 信号除了微血管变化对神经活动的响应外,相对没有其他来源的贡献,而 GE 信号,即使在浅层,也不是由非常大的血管主导的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
24.20%
发文量
376
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (Magn Reson Med) is an international journal devoted to the publication of original investigations concerned with all aspects of the development and use of nuclear magnetic resonance and electron paramagnetic resonance techniques for medical applications. Reports of original investigations in the areas of mathematics, computing, engineering, physics, biophysics, chemistry, biochemistry, and physiology directly relevant to magnetic resonance will be accepted, as well as methodology-oriented clinical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信