Clinical efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel and cisplatin in combination with concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
{"title":"Clinical efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel and cisplatin in combination with concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Penpa Yeshe, Fang Li","doi":"10.1093/jrr/rrae073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The meta-analysis was to evaluate the therapeutic benefits of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), primarily consisting of platinum-based regimens in conjunction with paclitaxel, when integrated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for individuals afflicted with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). The outcomes were determined by overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), complete response rate (CRR), objective response rate, recurrence rate and adverse events. The assessment of these outcomes was based on the relative risk (RR) accompanied by its 95% confidence interval (CI). Eight articles were included for analysis. LACC patients who underwent treatment with paclitaxel combined with cisplatin (TP)-based NACT in conjunction with CCRT demonstrated improved OS at 2 (RR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.07, 1.16, P < 0.001), 3 (RR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.23, 1.37, P < 0.001) and 5 years (RR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.10, 1.32, P < 0.001), as well as PFS at 1 (RR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.06, P = 0.035), 2 (RR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.04, 1.40, P = 0.012), 3 (RR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.17, 1.34, P < 0.001) and 5 (RR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.25, 1.55, P < 0.001) years, when compared with patients who received CCRT alone. Moreover, the TP-based NACT in conjunction with CCRT achieved a higher CRR and exhibited a lower rate of disease recurrence (RR:1.28, 95% CI:1.08, 1.50, P = 0.003). No significant differences in the risk of adverse effects including anemia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, radiocystitis and radiation enteritis between the group treated with TP-based NACT combined with CCRT and the group treated with CCRT alone were observed. The combination of TP-based NACT and CCRT demonstrates superior clinical efficacy than CCRT alone. This study may contribute to reducing the burden of LACC by using TP-based NACT plus CCRT.</p>","PeriodicalId":16922,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiation Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiation Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrae073","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The meta-analysis was to evaluate the therapeutic benefits of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), primarily consisting of platinum-based regimens in conjunction with paclitaxel, when integrated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for individuals afflicted with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). The outcomes were determined by overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), complete response rate (CRR), objective response rate, recurrence rate and adverse events. The assessment of these outcomes was based on the relative risk (RR) accompanied by its 95% confidence interval (CI). Eight articles were included for analysis. LACC patients who underwent treatment with paclitaxel combined with cisplatin (TP)-based NACT in conjunction with CCRT demonstrated improved OS at 2 (RR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.07, 1.16, P < 0.001), 3 (RR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.23, 1.37, P < 0.001) and 5 years (RR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.10, 1.32, P < 0.001), as well as PFS at 1 (RR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.06, P = 0.035), 2 (RR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.04, 1.40, P = 0.012), 3 (RR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.17, 1.34, P < 0.001) and 5 (RR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.25, 1.55, P < 0.001) years, when compared with patients who received CCRT alone. Moreover, the TP-based NACT in conjunction with CCRT achieved a higher CRR and exhibited a lower rate of disease recurrence (RR:1.28, 95% CI:1.08, 1.50, P = 0.003). No significant differences in the risk of adverse effects including anemia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, radiocystitis and radiation enteritis between the group treated with TP-based NACT combined with CCRT and the group treated with CCRT alone were observed. The combination of TP-based NACT and CCRT demonstrates superior clinical efficacy than CCRT alone. This study may contribute to reducing the burden of LACC by using TP-based NACT plus CCRT.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Radiation Research (JRR) is an official journal of The Japanese Radiation Research Society (JRRS), and the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology (JASTRO).
Since its launch in 1960 as the official journal of the JRRS, the journal has published scientific articles in radiation science in biology, chemistry, physics, epidemiology, and environmental sciences. JRR broadened its scope to include oncology in 2009, when JASTRO partnered with the JRRS to publish the journal.
Articles considered fall into two broad categories:
Oncology & Medicine - including all aspects of research with patients that impacts on the treatment of cancer using radiation. Papers which cover related radiation therapies, radiation dosimetry, and those describing the basis for treatment methods including techniques, are also welcomed. Clinical case reports are not acceptable.
Radiation Research - basic science studies of radiation effects on livings in the area of physics, chemistry, biology, epidemiology and environmental sciences.
Please be advised that JRR does not accept any papers of pure physics or chemistry.
The journal is bimonthly, and is edited and published by the JRR Editorial Committee.