{"title":"Automatic Echocardiographic Assessment of Left Atrial Function for Prediction of Low-Voltage Areas in Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation.","authors":"Shuai Chang, Xiaofeng Zhang, Chenliang Ge, Yanfen Zhong, Decai Zeng, Yongzhi Cai, Tongtong Huang, Ji Wu","doi":"10.2147/IJGM.S477499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Left atrial low-voltage areas (LA-LVAs) identified by 3D-electroanatomical mapping are crucial for determining treatment strategies and prognosis in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, convenient and accurate prediction of LA-LVAs remains challenging. This study aimed to assess the viability of utilizing automatically obtained echocardiographic parameters to predict the presence of LA-LVAs in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 190 NVAF patients who underwent initial catheter ablation. Before ablation, echocardiographic data were obtained, left atrial volume and strain were automatically calculated using advanced software (Dynamic-HeartModel and AutoStrain). Electroanatomic mapping (EAM) was also performed. Results were compared between patients with LA-LVAs ≥5% (LVAs group) and <5% (non-LVAs group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LA-LVAs were observed in 81 patients (42.6%), with a significantly higher incidence in those with persistent AF than paroxysmal AF (55.6% vs 19.3%, <i>P <</i>0.001). Compared with the non-LVAs group, the LVAs group included significantly older patients, lower left ventricular ejection fraction, higher heart rate, and higher E/e' ratio (<i>P</i> <0.05). The LVAs group exhibited higher left atrial volume<sub>max</sub> index (LAVi<sub>max</sub>) and lower left atrial reservoir strain (LASr) (<i>P</i> <0.001). In multivariate analysis, both LAVi<sub>max</sub> and LASr emerged as independent indicators of LVAs (OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.80-0.90, <i>P</i><0.001) and (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.02-1.29, <i>P</i> =0.021). ROC analysis demonstrated good predictive capacity for LA-LVAs, with an AUC of 0.733 (95% CI 0.650-0.794, <i>P</i> <0.001) for LAVi<sub>max</sub> and 0.839 (95% CI 0.779-0.898, <i>P</i> <0.001) for LASr.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Automatic assessment of LAVi<sub>max</sub> and LASr presents a promising non-invasive modality for predicting the presence of LA-LVAs and evaluating significant atrial remodeling in NVAF patients. This approach holds potential for aiding in risk stratification and treatment decision-making, ultimately improving clinical outcomes in patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":14131,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of General Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11456279/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of General Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S477499","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Left atrial low-voltage areas (LA-LVAs) identified by 3D-electroanatomical mapping are crucial for determining treatment strategies and prognosis in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, convenient and accurate prediction of LA-LVAs remains challenging. This study aimed to assess the viability of utilizing automatically obtained echocardiographic parameters to predict the presence of LA-LVAs in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).
Patients and methods: This retrospective study included 190 NVAF patients who underwent initial catheter ablation. Before ablation, echocardiographic data were obtained, left atrial volume and strain were automatically calculated using advanced software (Dynamic-HeartModel and AutoStrain). Electroanatomic mapping (EAM) was also performed. Results were compared between patients with LA-LVAs ≥5% (LVAs group) and <5% (non-LVAs group).
Results: LA-LVAs were observed in 81 patients (42.6%), with a significantly higher incidence in those with persistent AF than paroxysmal AF (55.6% vs 19.3%, P <0.001). Compared with the non-LVAs group, the LVAs group included significantly older patients, lower left ventricular ejection fraction, higher heart rate, and higher E/e' ratio (P <0.05). The LVAs group exhibited higher left atrial volumemax index (LAVimax) and lower left atrial reservoir strain (LASr) (P <0.001). In multivariate analysis, both LAVimax and LASr emerged as independent indicators of LVAs (OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.80-0.90, P<0.001) and (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.02-1.29, P =0.021). ROC analysis demonstrated good predictive capacity for LA-LVAs, with an AUC of 0.733 (95% CI 0.650-0.794, P <0.001) for LAVimax and 0.839 (95% CI 0.779-0.898, P <0.001) for LASr.
Conclusion: Automatic assessment of LAVimax and LASr presents a promising non-invasive modality for predicting the presence of LA-LVAs and evaluating significant atrial remodeling in NVAF patients. This approach holds potential for aiding in risk stratification and treatment decision-making, ultimately improving clinical outcomes in patients.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of General Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focuses on general and internal medicine, pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, monitoring and treatment protocols. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research and clinical studies across all disease areas.
A key focus of the journal is the elucidation of disease processes and management protocols resulting in improved outcomes for the patient. Patient perspectives such as satisfaction, quality of life, health literacy and communication and their role in developing new healthcare programs and optimizing clinical outcomes are major areas of interest for the journal.
As of 1st April 2019, the International Journal of General Medicine will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.