Efficacy of Topical Cyclosporine Combined with Punctal Plugs in Treating Dry Eye Disease and Inflammation.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of punctal plugs combined with cyclosporine eye drops on dry eye disease (DED) and ocular surface inflammation.

Methods: In a clinical trial, 73 patients were randomly allocated into three groups: punctal plug group, combination therapy group, and cyclosporine group. At the baseline and four weeks after treatment, the Schirmer I test score, fluorescein tear film break-up time (FBUT), ocular surface staining score and dry eye symptoms were assessed. Tear samples were collected to detect the level of inflammatory factors (interleukins, matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α)). In an animal experiment, a New Zealand rabbit dry eye model was induced. The rabbits were randomly divided into control group, punctal plug group, and combination therapy group (n = 6). Conjunctival goblet cell density, protein level of MMP-9 in conjunctiva and mRNA levels of inflammatory factors in conjunctiva and cornea were measured before and after treatment.

Results: In combination therapy group of the clinical trial, the following results were observed: significant improvement in Schirmer I test scores and FBUT compared to the cyclosporine group and punctal plug group, respectively; a decrease in the tear levels of IL-6, IL-1, and MMP-9 compared to the punctal plug group; and a decrease in the tear levels of IL-1α, IL-6, and IL-17 compared to the baseline (all p < 0.05). In the animal experiment, rabbits in combination therapy group had a higher goblet cell density (p < 0.01) and lower mRNA levels of IL-16 (p < 0.05), IL-17 (p < 0.05), and MMP-9 (p < 0.01) in conjunctiva and that of MMP-9 (p < 0.01) in cornea compared to punctal plug group.

Conclusion: Cyclosporine eye drops combined with degradable punctal plugs is a more optimized clinical treatment strategy for DED compared with degradable punctal plugs or cyclosporine eye drops alone, considering the influence of comprehensive clinical efficacy and ocular surface inflammation.