Francisco Fontes Cintra, Mauricio Etchebehere, Eduardo Rached, Giancarlo Cavenaghi, Paulo Eduardo Dias Rahal, Rodrigo Gonçalves Pagnano
{"title":"Revision knee arthroplasty using a modular system manufactured in Brazil. Clinical and radiographic results with a mean nine-year follow-up.","authors":"Francisco Fontes Cintra, Mauricio Etchebehere, Eduardo Rached, Giancarlo Cavenaghi, Paulo Eduardo Dias Rahal, Rodrigo Gonçalves Pagnano","doi":"10.1016/j.clinsp.2024.100508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To demonstrate the clinical and radiographic results of revision knee arthroplasty using a modular system manufactured in Brazil.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between November 2010 and January 2017, 31 revision knee arthroplasties were performed in 30 patients, using the MB-V system. Patients were assessed clinically and radiographically after a minimum follow-up of two years using the following scores: Knee Society Score (KSS), Knee Society Score ‒ Function (KSS ‒ Function), and Knee Society Roentgenographic Evaluation System (KSRES).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the patients, 19 were women. The mean age at surgery was 68 years. The mean follow-up was 9.1 years. There was no aseptic loosening in this period. The mean values of KSS, KSS-function, and KSRES were, respectively, 82, 77, and less than 4. One patient evolved with postoperative flexion instability. Two knees became infected, requiring the removal of the prosthesis and implantation of spacers loaded with antibiotics. One patient developed arthrofibrosis. One patient had a dislocation with full medial collateral avulsion and had to be re-operated with an insert exchange to a CCK liner and medial collateral reconstruction as proposed by Krakow.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This implant had 93.5 % survivorship (no cases of aseptic failure) and good results in 27 out of 31 knees (87 % of the surgeries).</p>","PeriodicalId":10472,"journal":{"name":"Clinics","volume":"79 ","pages":"100508"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11491884/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinsp.2024.100508","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To demonstrate the clinical and radiographic results of revision knee arthroplasty using a modular system manufactured in Brazil.
Methods: Between November 2010 and January 2017, 31 revision knee arthroplasties were performed in 30 patients, using the MB-V system. Patients were assessed clinically and radiographically after a minimum follow-up of two years using the following scores: Knee Society Score (KSS), Knee Society Score ‒ Function (KSS ‒ Function), and Knee Society Roentgenographic Evaluation System (KSRES).
Results: Among the patients, 19 were women. The mean age at surgery was 68 years. The mean follow-up was 9.1 years. There was no aseptic loosening in this period. The mean values of KSS, KSS-function, and KSRES were, respectively, 82, 77, and less than 4. One patient evolved with postoperative flexion instability. Two knees became infected, requiring the removal of the prosthesis and implantation of spacers loaded with antibiotics. One patient developed arthrofibrosis. One patient had a dislocation with full medial collateral avulsion and had to be re-operated with an insert exchange to a CCK liner and medial collateral reconstruction as proposed by Krakow.
Conclusion: This implant had 93.5 % survivorship (no cases of aseptic failure) and good results in 27 out of 31 knees (87 % of the surgeries).
期刊介绍:
CLINICS is an electronic journal that publishes peer-reviewed articles in continuous flow, of interest to clinicians and researchers in the medical sciences. CLINICS complies with the policies of funding agencies which request or require deposition of the published articles that they fund into publicly available databases. CLINICS supports the position of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) on trial registration.