{"title":"Differences in motor network reorganization between patients with good and poor upper extremity impairment outcomes after stroke.","authors":"Ran Li, Yong Wang, Haimei Li, Jie Liu, Sujuan Liu","doi":"10.1007/s11682-024-00917-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Changes in cortical excitability after stroke are closely associated with motor function recovery. This study aimed to clarify the motor network reorganization mechanisms corresponding to the different clinical outcomes of upper limb motor impairment in patients with subacute stroke. Motor function was assessed before rehabilitation (pre), after rehabilitation (post), and at the 1-year follow-up (follow-up) using the Fugl-Meyer assessment upper extremity scale. Further, resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data were collected in both pre- and post-conditions. Twenty patients with stroke were categorized into good and poor outcome groups based on motor impairments at the 1-year follow-up. Functional connections between motor-related regions of interest and the rest of the brain were subsequently calculated. Finally, the correlation between motor network reorganization and behavioral improvement at the 1-year follow-up was analyzed. The good outcome group exhibited a positive precondition motor function and continuous improvement, whereas the poor outcome group showed a weak precondition motor function and insignificant improvement. Contralesional hemisphere-related connections were found to be higher in the good outcome group pre-conditioning, with both groups showing minimal change post-conditioning, while no relationship with motor impairment was found. Long interhemispheric connections were decreased and increased in the good and poor outcome groups respectively, and were negatively correlated with motor impairment. Different motor network reorganizations during the subacute phase can influence the varying motor outcomes in the affected upper limb after stroke. These findings may serve as the theoretical basis for future neuromodulatory research.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-024-00917-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Changes in cortical excitability after stroke are closely associated with motor function recovery. This study aimed to clarify the motor network reorganization mechanisms corresponding to the different clinical outcomes of upper limb motor impairment in patients with subacute stroke. Motor function was assessed before rehabilitation (pre), after rehabilitation (post), and at the 1-year follow-up (follow-up) using the Fugl-Meyer assessment upper extremity scale. Further, resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data were collected in both pre- and post-conditions. Twenty patients with stroke were categorized into good and poor outcome groups based on motor impairments at the 1-year follow-up. Functional connections between motor-related regions of interest and the rest of the brain were subsequently calculated. Finally, the correlation between motor network reorganization and behavioral improvement at the 1-year follow-up was analyzed. The good outcome group exhibited a positive precondition motor function and continuous improvement, whereas the poor outcome group showed a weak precondition motor function and insignificant improvement. Contralesional hemisphere-related connections were found to be higher in the good outcome group pre-conditioning, with both groups showing minimal change post-conditioning, while no relationship with motor impairment was found. Long interhemispheric connections were decreased and increased in the good and poor outcome groups respectively, and were negatively correlated with motor impairment. Different motor network reorganizations during the subacute phase can influence the varying motor outcomes in the affected upper limb after stroke. These findings may serve as the theoretical basis for future neuromodulatory research.