Progression of coronary artery calcium density and major adverse cardiovascular events

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Qingchao Meng, Li Zhao, Na Zhao, Yunqiang An, Bin Lu , Yang Gao
{"title":"Progression of coronary artery calcium density and major adverse cardiovascular events","authors":"Qingchao Meng,&nbsp;Li Zhao,&nbsp;Na Zhao,&nbsp;Yunqiang An,&nbsp;Bin Lu ,&nbsp;Yang Gao","doi":"10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2024.118593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and aims</h3><div>We aimed to investigate the relationship between coronary artery calcium (CAC) density progression and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and the prognostic value of CAC density progression.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients with serial CAC scans were enrolled in this study. CAC density was directly measured in calcified lesions. Change and rate of progression of CAC density were calculated. Cox proportional hazard regression was utilized to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for time to MACE regarding CAC density. The incremental prognostic value and the reclassification ability of CAC density progression were evaluated using the C-index and continuous net reclassification index (NRI).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>304 patients (57.86 ± 9.47 years, 69.4 % male) were included. There were 47 MACE over a follow–up period of 76.00 (56.00–95.00) months. After adjustment for risk factors and CAC volume, the change of CAC density was inversely associated with MACE (per 10HU: HR: 0.956, 95 % confidence interval: 0.920–0.992, <em>p</em> = 0.018). Adding the change of CAC density to risk factors and baseline CAC density improved the C-index (0.694 <em>vs.</em> 0.678, <em>p</em> = 0.026). Adding the change of CAC density improved reclassification of MACE compared with risk factors and baseline CAC density [NRI = 0.432 (0.016–0.789)].</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>CAC density progression is inversely associated with MACE. The addition of the change of CAC density improves prognostic value compared to baseline risk factors and CAC density and optimizes risk reclassification.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8623,"journal":{"name":"Atherosclerosis","volume":"398 ","pages":"Article 118593"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atherosclerosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021915024011651","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims

We aimed to investigate the relationship between coronary artery calcium (CAC) density progression and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and the prognostic value of CAC density progression.

Methods

Patients with serial CAC scans were enrolled in this study. CAC density was directly measured in calcified lesions. Change and rate of progression of CAC density were calculated. Cox proportional hazard regression was utilized to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for time to MACE regarding CAC density. The incremental prognostic value and the reclassification ability of CAC density progression were evaluated using the C-index and continuous net reclassification index (NRI).

Results

304 patients (57.86 ± 9.47 years, 69.4 % male) were included. There were 47 MACE over a follow–up period of 76.00 (56.00–95.00) months. After adjustment for risk factors and CAC volume, the change of CAC density was inversely associated with MACE (per 10HU: HR: 0.956, 95 % confidence interval: 0.920–0.992, p = 0.018). Adding the change of CAC density to risk factors and baseline CAC density improved the C-index (0.694 vs. 0.678, p = 0.026). Adding the change of CAC density improved reclassification of MACE compared with risk factors and baseline CAC density [NRI = 0.432 (0.016–0.789)].

Conclusions

CAC density progression is inversely associated with MACE. The addition of the change of CAC density improves prognostic value compared to baseline risk factors and CAC density and optimizes risk reclassification.

Abstract Image

冠状动脉钙密度的进展与主要不良心血管事件。
背景与目的我们旨在研究冠状动脉钙化(CAC)密度进展与主要不良心血管事件(MACE)之间的关系,以及CAC密度进展的预后价值:本研究招募了接受连续 CAC 扫描的患者。方法:本研究招募了接受连续 CAC 扫描的患者,直接测量钙化病灶的 CAC 密度。计算CAC密度的变化和进展率。利用 Cox 比例危险回归估算出 CAC 密度与 MACE 发生时间的危险比 (HRs)。使用C指数和连续净再分类指数(NRI)评估了CAC密度进展的增量预后价值和再分类能力:共纳入 304 名患者(57.86 ± 9.47 岁,69.4% 为男性)。在76.00(56.00-95.00)个月的随访期间,共有47例MACE。在对风险因素和 CAC 容量进行调整后,CAC 密度的变化与 MACE 呈反比(每 10HU HR:0.956,95 % 置信区间:0.920-0.992,p = 0.018)。在风险因素和基线 CAC 密度的基础上增加 CAC 密度的变化,可改善 C 指数(0.694 vs. 0.678,p = 0.026)。与危险因素和基线CAC密度相比,增加CAC密度变化可改善MACE的再分类[NRI = 0.432 (0.016-0.789)] :结论:CAC密度的增加与MACE成反比。结论:CAC密度的变化与MACE成反比。与基线风险因素和CAC密度相比,CAC密度的变化提高了预后价值,并优化了风险再分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Atherosclerosis
Atherosclerosis 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
1269
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: Atherosclerosis has an open access mirror journal Atherosclerosis: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. Atherosclerosis brings together, from all sources, papers concerned with investigation on atherosclerosis, its risk factors and clinical manifestations. Atherosclerosis covers basic and translational, clinical and population research approaches to arterial and vascular biology and disease, as well as their risk factors including: disturbances of lipid and lipoprotein metabolism, diabetes and hypertension, thrombosis, and inflammation. The Editors are interested in original or review papers dealing with the pathogenesis, environmental, genetic and epigenetic basis, diagnosis or treatment of atherosclerosis and related diseases as well as their risk factors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信