Sara U. Júlio , Miriam Schneuwly , Paulina S. Scheuren , Nikolai Pfender , Carl M. Zipser , Michèle Hubli , Martin Schubert
{"title":"Intra-epidermal electrically evoked potentials are sensitive to detect degenerative cervical myelopathy suggesting their spinothalamic propagation","authors":"Sara U. Júlio , Miriam Schneuwly , Paulina S. Scheuren , Nikolai Pfender , Carl M. Zipser , Michèle Hubli , Martin Schubert","doi":"10.1016/j.clinph.2024.09.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a centromedullary spinal cord disorder mainly affecting crossing fibers. While contact heat evoked potentials (CHEPs) are sensitive in detecting DCM by testing spinothalamic integrity, somatosensory evoked potentials (dSSEPs) show unaffected dorsal column conduction. Intra-epidermal electrically evoked potentials (IEEPs) have unknown spinal propagation after noxious stimulation. We investigated (1) the spinothalamic tract propagation and (2) the discriminative power in detecting spinal pathology of IEEPs compared to CHEPs and dSSEPs in DCM.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>DCM was diagnosed by neurological examination regarding stenosis (MRI). Stimulation of C6, C8, and T4 dermatomes yielded dSSEPs, CHEPs, and IEEPs. (1) Spinal propagation was assessed through concordant or discordant responses, and (2) discriminative power was determined using receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty-seven patients (8F, 56 ± 12yrs) with DCM were analyzed and compared to age-matched healthy controls. IEEPs were abnormal in 43–54%, CHEPs in 37–69%, and dSSEPs in 4–12%. IEEPs showed high concordance with abnormalities of CHEPs (62–69%). ROC analyses showed good discriminative power of CHEPs and IEEPs contrary to dSSEPs.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The concordance of abnormal responses of CHEPs and IEEPs contrary to dSSEPs suggests spinothalamic propagation of IEEPs.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>Minimal differences between CHEPs and IEEPs suggest complementary potential by the combined testing of spinothalamic tract integrity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10671,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1388245724002736","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a centromedullary spinal cord disorder mainly affecting crossing fibers. While contact heat evoked potentials (CHEPs) are sensitive in detecting DCM by testing spinothalamic integrity, somatosensory evoked potentials (dSSEPs) show unaffected dorsal column conduction. Intra-epidermal electrically evoked potentials (IEEPs) have unknown spinal propagation after noxious stimulation. We investigated (1) the spinothalamic tract propagation and (2) the discriminative power in detecting spinal pathology of IEEPs compared to CHEPs and dSSEPs in DCM.
Methods
DCM was diagnosed by neurological examination regarding stenosis (MRI). Stimulation of C6, C8, and T4 dermatomes yielded dSSEPs, CHEPs, and IEEPs. (1) Spinal propagation was assessed through concordant or discordant responses, and (2) discriminative power was determined using receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC).
Results
Twenty-seven patients (8F, 56 ± 12yrs) with DCM were analyzed and compared to age-matched healthy controls. IEEPs were abnormal in 43–54%, CHEPs in 37–69%, and dSSEPs in 4–12%. IEEPs showed high concordance with abnormalities of CHEPs (62–69%). ROC analyses showed good discriminative power of CHEPs and IEEPs contrary to dSSEPs.
Conclusions
The concordance of abnormal responses of CHEPs and IEEPs contrary to dSSEPs suggests spinothalamic propagation of IEEPs.
Significance
Minimal differences between CHEPs and IEEPs suggest complementary potential by the combined testing of spinothalamic tract integrity.
期刊介绍:
As of January 1999, The journal Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, and its two sections Electromyography and Motor Control and Evoked Potentials have amalgamated to become this journal - Clinical Neurophysiology.
Clinical Neurophysiology is the official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Brazilian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Czech Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Italian Clinical Neurophysiology Society and the International Society of Intraoperative Neurophysiology.The journal is dedicated to fostering research and disseminating information on all aspects of both normal and abnormal functioning of the nervous system. The key aim of the publication is to disseminate scholarly reports on the pathophysiology underlying diseases of the central and peripheral nervous system of human patients. Clinical trials that use neurophysiological measures to document change are encouraged, as are manuscripts reporting data on integrated neuroimaging of central nervous function including, but not limited to, functional MRI, MEG, EEG, PET and other neuroimaging modalities.