Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Collection of Older Adults in the UCHealth Electronic Health Record: Assessing the First Three Years of Implementation.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Korijna G Valenti, Carmen Lewis, Zachary Giano, Jared Rieck, Rita Lee
{"title":"Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Collection of Older Adults in the UCHealth Electronic Health Record: Assessing the First Three Years of Implementation.","authors":"Korijna G Valenti, Carmen Lewis, Zachary Giano, Jared Rieck, Rita Lee","doi":"10.1080/07317115.2024.2411709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study examines sexual orientation/gender identity (SOGI) data collection in older adults from the UCHealth systems electronic health record.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data of older adults aged 55 and older were analyzed between January 2019 and December 2022. Prevalence of SOGI documentation based on four new SOGI-related questions were analyzed along with social history documentation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were missing in reports (93% for sexual orientation and 96% for gender identity). Of 459,544 older adults potentially identifiable as a sexual or gender minority (SGM), 8.24% could be identified through other social history, and 91.76% could not. Data often returned a response of \"undisclosed\" (1.04%) or \"unspecified\" (98.79%), leaving .005% to represent the identifiable population of SGM minority adults.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SOGI data often was not documented through questions recommended since January 2019. It is unlikely that .005% accurately represents the SGM older patient population as national estimates are between 7%-11%. Lower reported percentages of SGM older adults may lead to less recognition of patient needs, and thus less equitable and personalized care.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>These findings exemplify the need for evaluation strategies to be designed to improve SOGI collection with the primary goal of promoting equity and inclusion for SGM older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":10376,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2024.2411709","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study examines sexual orientation/gender identity (SOGI) data collection in older adults from the UCHealth systems electronic health record.

Methods: Data of older adults aged 55 and older were analyzed between January 2019 and December 2022. Prevalence of SOGI documentation based on four new SOGI-related questions were analyzed along with social history documentation.

Results: Data were missing in reports (93% for sexual orientation and 96% for gender identity). Of 459,544 older adults potentially identifiable as a sexual or gender minority (SGM), 8.24% could be identified through other social history, and 91.76% could not. Data often returned a response of "undisclosed" (1.04%) or "unspecified" (98.79%), leaving .005% to represent the identifiable population of SGM minority adults.

Conclusions: SOGI data often was not documented through questions recommended since January 2019. It is unlikely that .005% accurately represents the SGM older patient population as national estimates are between 7%-11%. Lower reported percentages of SGM older adults may lead to less recognition of patient needs, and thus less equitable and personalized care.

Clinical implications: These findings exemplify the need for evaluation strategies to be designed to improve SOGI collection with the primary goal of promoting equity and inclusion for SGM older adults.

在 UCHealth 电子健康记录中收集老年人的性取向和性别认同信息:评估前三年的实施情况。
目的: 本研究探讨了从 UCHealth 系统电子健康记录中收集的老年人性取向/性别认同(SOGI)数据:本研究从 UCHealth 系统的电子健康记录中收集老年人的性取向/性别认同(SOGI)数据:分析了 2019 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月期间 55 岁及以上老年人的数据。根据四个与 SOGI 相关的新问题分析了 SOGI 记录的普遍性,同时还分析了社会历史记录:报告中数据缺失(性取向缺失率为 93%,性别认同缺失率为 96%)。在 459 544 名有可能被认定为性少数群体或性别少数群体(SGM)的老年人中,8.24% 的人可以通过其他社会历史进行认定,91.76% 的人无法认定。数据返回的回复往往是 "未披露"(1.04%)或 "未说明"(98.79%),剩下的 0.005% 代表可识别的 SGM 少数群体成年人:自 2019 年 1 月以来,SOGI 数据往往没有通过建议的问题记录下来。0.005% 不太可能准确代表 SGM 老年患者人群,因为全国的估计值在 7%-11% 之间。报告的 SGM 老年患者比例较低可能会导致对患者需求的认识不足,从而减少公平和个性化的护理:这些研究结果说明,有必要制定评估策略,以改善性别平等数据的收集工作,其主要目标是促进平等,并将 SGM 老年人纳入其中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Gerontologist
Clinical Gerontologist GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
25.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Gerontologist presents original research, reviews, and clinical comments relevant to the needs of behavioral health professionals and all practitioners who work with older adults. Published in cooperation with Psychologists in Long Term Care, the journal is designed for psychologists, physicians, nurses, social workers, counselors (family, pastoral, and vocational), and other health professionals who address behavioral health concerns found in later life, including: -adjustments to changing roles- issues related to diversity and aging- family caregiving- spirituality- cognitive and psychosocial assessment- depression, anxiety, and PTSD- Alzheimer’s disease and other neurocognitive disorders- long term care- behavioral medicine in aging- rehabilitation and education for older adults. Each issue provides insightful articles on current topics. Submissions are peer reviewed by content experts and selected for both scholarship and relevance to the practitioner to ensure that the articles are among the best in the field. Authors report original research and conceptual reviews. A unique column in Clinical Gerontologist is “Clinical Comments." This section features brief observations and specific suggestions from practitioners which avoid elaborate research designs or long reference lists. This section is a unique opportunity for you to learn about the valuable clinical work of your peers in a short, concise format.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信