Improvement of quality of life in women ≤ 25-years-old with chronic pelvic pain following stenting of nonthrombotic iliac vein compression.

Elizabeth Brooke Spencer, Ariana Schuelke, Kyra Porter, Jacqueline Nelson, Elisabeth S Horne
{"title":"Improvement of quality of life in women ≤ 25-years-old with chronic pelvic pain following stenting of nonthrombotic iliac vein compression.","authors":"Elizabeth Brooke Spencer, Ariana Schuelke, Kyra Porter, Jacqueline Nelson, Elisabeth S Horne","doi":"10.1177/02683555241287312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Stenting of nonthrombotic iliac vein compression for chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is controversial, especially in young populations. The current study evaluated the effects of iliac vein stenting on CPP through the assessment of quality-of-life (QoL) and pain scores in female patients ≤25-year-old.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective single site cohort study was conducted for 30 female patients who were treated with left common iliac vein (LCIV) stenting for CPP. QoL was assessed before and after stenting using the following assessments: International Pelvic Pain Society (IPPS), Pelvic Congestion Syndrome (PCS), Pelvic Pain and Urinary Urgency Frequency (PUF), Rome III IBS, ancillary symptoms assessment, and pain scores. Secondary evaluation of the accuracy of radiologic interpretations of iliac vein compression on CT and MRI was also performed. Finally, commonly associated comorbidities within this population were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patient reported outcomes in 30 iliac vein stent patients demonstrated improvements in QoL post-stenting as demonstrated through significant reductions in IPPS, PCS, and pain scores (<i>p</i> = .0103, .0156, and .0092, respectively). Many of the cross-sectional imaging studies that were read by the interpreting radiologist as normal or mild compression were later identified as moderate or severe by the interventional radiologist clinically evaluating the patient. These patients went on to show significant compression on venography and intravascular ultrasound with associated clinical improvement after stenting.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significant improvements in QoL were identified in young women with CPP after LCIV stenting. Similarities in the clinical presentation of common comorbidities and misinterpretation of cross-sectional imaging studies may make the identification of pelvic venous disease more challenging. Our findings endorse the need for further research on stenting in young women with venous origin CPP through comparative outcomes studies and blinded randomized controlled trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":94350,"journal":{"name":"Phlebology","volume":" ","pages":"2683555241287312"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phlebology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555241287312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Stenting of nonthrombotic iliac vein compression for chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is controversial, especially in young populations. The current study evaluated the effects of iliac vein stenting on CPP through the assessment of quality-of-life (QoL) and pain scores in female patients ≤25-year-old.

Methods: A retrospective single site cohort study was conducted for 30 female patients who were treated with left common iliac vein (LCIV) stenting for CPP. QoL was assessed before and after stenting using the following assessments: International Pelvic Pain Society (IPPS), Pelvic Congestion Syndrome (PCS), Pelvic Pain and Urinary Urgency Frequency (PUF), Rome III IBS, ancillary symptoms assessment, and pain scores. Secondary evaluation of the accuracy of radiologic interpretations of iliac vein compression on CT and MRI was also performed. Finally, commonly associated comorbidities within this population were assessed.

Results: Patient reported outcomes in 30 iliac vein stent patients demonstrated improvements in QoL post-stenting as demonstrated through significant reductions in IPPS, PCS, and pain scores (p = .0103, .0156, and .0092, respectively). Many of the cross-sectional imaging studies that were read by the interpreting radiologist as normal or mild compression were later identified as moderate or severe by the interventional radiologist clinically evaluating the patient. These patients went on to show significant compression on venography and intravascular ultrasound with associated clinical improvement after stenting.

Conclusion: Significant improvements in QoL were identified in young women with CPP after LCIV stenting. Similarities in the clinical presentation of common comorbidities and misinterpretation of cross-sectional imaging studies may make the identification of pelvic venous disease more challenging. Our findings endorse the need for further research on stenting in young women with venous origin CPP through comparative outcomes studies and blinded randomized controlled trials.

非血栓性髂静脉压迫支架置入术后,改善 25 岁以下慢性盆腔疼痛女性的生活质量。
目的:对非血栓性髂静脉压迫进行支架植入治疗慢性盆腔痛(CPP)尚存在争议,尤其是在年轻人群中。本研究通过评估 25 岁以下女性患者的生活质量(QoL)和疼痛评分,评估了髂静脉支架植入术对 CPP 的影响:对30名接受左侧髂总静脉(LCIV)支架治疗的女性患者进行了一项回顾性单点队列研究。支架植入前后的 QoL 评估采用了以下评估方法:国际盆腔疼痛协会 (IPPS)、盆腔充血综合征 (PCS)、盆腔疼痛和尿频 (PUF)、罗马 III IBS、辅助症状评估和疼痛评分。此外,还对 CT 和 MRI 对髂静脉压迫的放射学解释的准确性进行了二次评估。最后,还对该人群中常见的相关合并症进行了评估:结果:30 名髂静脉支架患者的患者报告结果显示,支架植入术后患者的 QoL 有所改善,IPPS、PCS 和疼痛评分显著降低(p = .0103、.0156 和 .0092)。在横断面成像检查中,许多被放射科医生判定为正常或轻度压迫的患者后来被临床评估患者的介入放射科医生判定为中度或重度压迫。这些患者在支架植入术后,静脉造影和血管内超声检查均显示出明显的压迫症状,临床症状也随之改善:结论:LCIV支架置入术后,患有CPP的年轻女性的生活质量明显改善。常见合并症临床表现的相似性和横断面成像研究的误读可能会使盆腔静脉疾病的识别更具挑战性。我们的研究结果表明,有必要通过比较结果研究和盲法随机对照试验对患有静脉源性 CPP 的年轻女性进行支架植入术的进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信