Development, feasibility, and preliminary effects of a culturally adapted, evidence-based, and theory-driven diabetes self-management programme for Chinese adults with type 2 diabetes receiving insulin injection therapy.
Wei Liang, Ka Ming Chow, Xiaoying Ni, Yetunde Oluwafunmilayo Tola, Suzanne Hoi Shan Lo
{"title":"Development, feasibility, and preliminary effects of a culturally adapted, evidence-based, and theory-driven diabetes self-management programme for Chinese adults with type 2 diabetes receiving insulin injection therapy.","authors":"Wei Liang, Ka Ming Chow, Xiaoying Ni, Yetunde Oluwafunmilayo Tola, Suzanne Hoi Shan Lo","doi":"10.1016/j.pcd.2024.09.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To describe the development of a culturally adapted, evidence-based, and theory-driven diabetes self-management programme for Chinese adults with type 2 diabetes receiving insulin injection therapy and to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects of the newly developed intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Medical Research Council framework was adopted to guide the intervention development and a feasibility study. A prospective, two-arm, parallel-group, assessor-blinded randomised controlled trial was conducted. Participants were randomly allocated to receive either the newly developed intervention or parallel attention control contact from community nurses. Between-group differences in changes in outcome variables were analysed using the Mann-Whitney U test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The newly developed intervention consists of one individual interview session, three group-based education sessions, and two telephone-based maintenance sessions. A total of 24 participants were recruited with the recruitment rate and overall retention rate of 77.4 % and 95.8 %, respectively. The results indicated that the intervention participants reported significantly greater improvements in self-efficacy (Hedge's g = 1.69) and self-management behaviours (Hedge's g = 3.24), and reductions in diabetes-related distress (Hedge's g = 1.49) compared with those in the control group (all p< 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The diabetes self-management programme was feasible and acceptable. The intervention showed promising patient-centred benefits. A future large-scale randomised controlled trial is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":94177,"journal":{"name":"Primary care diabetes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary care diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2024.09.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims: To describe the development of a culturally adapted, evidence-based, and theory-driven diabetes self-management programme for Chinese adults with type 2 diabetes receiving insulin injection therapy and to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects of the newly developed intervention.
Methods: The Medical Research Council framework was adopted to guide the intervention development and a feasibility study. A prospective, two-arm, parallel-group, assessor-blinded randomised controlled trial was conducted. Participants were randomly allocated to receive either the newly developed intervention or parallel attention control contact from community nurses. Between-group differences in changes in outcome variables were analysed using the Mann-Whitney U test.
Results: The newly developed intervention consists of one individual interview session, three group-based education sessions, and two telephone-based maintenance sessions. A total of 24 participants were recruited with the recruitment rate and overall retention rate of 77.4 % and 95.8 %, respectively. The results indicated that the intervention participants reported significantly greater improvements in self-efficacy (Hedge's g = 1.69) and self-management behaviours (Hedge's g = 3.24), and reductions in diabetes-related distress (Hedge's g = 1.49) compared with those in the control group (all p< 0.05).
Conclusion: The diabetes self-management programme was feasible and acceptable. The intervention showed promising patient-centred benefits. A future large-scale randomised controlled trial is warranted.