Meta-correlation of the effect of ketamine and psilocybin induced subjective effects on therapeutic outcome

Jack D. C. Dahan, David Dadiomov, Tijmen Bostoen, Albert Dahan
{"title":"Meta-correlation of the effect of ketamine and psilocybin induced subjective effects on therapeutic outcome","authors":"Jack D. C. Dahan, David Dadiomov, Tijmen Bostoen, Albert Dahan","doi":"10.1038/s44184-024-00091-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is some evidence that the subjective effects of ketamine and other psychedelics like psilocybin are crucial for their therapeutic outcomes, such as treatment of depression or substance use disorder (SUD). We performed a meta-analysis and systematic review on the correlation of subjective symptoms and dissociation versus ketamine-induced therapeutic outcomes in patients with depression or SUD. A similar analysis was conducted for psilocybin-induced therapeutic improvement. We retrieved 23 papers studying ketamine (21 on depression, 2 on SUD) in 471 patients and 8 papers studying psilocybin (6 on depression, 2 on SUD) in 183 patients. Our study demonstrated a modest role for subjective effects mediating therapeutic outcomes, with R2-values ranging from 5–10% for ketamine and for psilocybine the R2 was 24%. A greater mediating effect for psilocybin compared to ketamine was detected, particularly when restricting the analysis to depression. Additionally there is a greater mediating effect in SUD than depression, irrespective of treatment.","PeriodicalId":74321,"journal":{"name":"Npj mental health research","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44184-024-00091-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Npj mental health research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44184-024-00091-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is some evidence that the subjective effects of ketamine and other psychedelics like psilocybin are crucial for their therapeutic outcomes, such as treatment of depression or substance use disorder (SUD). We performed a meta-analysis and systematic review on the correlation of subjective symptoms and dissociation versus ketamine-induced therapeutic outcomes in patients with depression or SUD. A similar analysis was conducted for psilocybin-induced therapeutic improvement. We retrieved 23 papers studying ketamine (21 on depression, 2 on SUD) in 471 patients and 8 papers studying psilocybin (6 on depression, 2 on SUD) in 183 patients. Our study demonstrated a modest role for subjective effects mediating therapeutic outcomes, with R2-values ranging from 5–10% for ketamine and for psilocybine the R2 was 24%. A greater mediating effect for psilocybin compared to ketamine was detected, particularly when restricting the analysis to depression. Additionally there is a greater mediating effect in SUD than depression, irrespective of treatment.

Abstract Image

氯胺酮和迷幻药诱导的主观效应对治疗结果影响的元相关性。
有证据表明,氯胺酮和其他迷幻剂(如迷幻药)的主观效应对其治疗效果至关重要,如治疗抑郁症或药物使用障碍(SUD)。我们对抑郁症或药物使用障碍患者的主观症状和解离与氯胺酮诱导的治疗效果之间的相关性进行了荟萃分析和系统综述。我们还对迷幻药诱导的疗效改善进行了类似的分析。我们检索到 23 篇研究氯胺酮的论文(21 篇关于抑郁症,2 篇关于药物依赖性障碍),涉及 471 名患者;8 篇研究迷幻剂的论文(6 篇关于抑郁症,2 篇关于药物依赖性障碍),涉及 183 名患者。我们的研究表明,主观效应对治疗结果的中介作用不大,氯胺酮的 R2 值为 5-10%,而西洛赛宾的 R2 值为 24%。与氯胺酮相比,西洛赛宾的中介效应更大,尤其是在对抑郁症进行分析时。此外,与抑郁症相比,精神分裂症的中介效应更大,与治疗方法无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信