Fire and ant interactions mediated by honeydew and extrafloral nectar in an australian tropical savanna.

IF 2.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Oecologia Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-05 DOI:10.1007/s00442-024-05628-6
Fernanda M P Oliveira, Carlos H F Silva, Melinda L Moir, Inara R Leal, Alan N Andersen
{"title":"Fire and ant interactions mediated by honeydew and extrafloral nectar in an australian tropical savanna.","authors":"Fernanda M P Oliveira, Carlos H F Silva, Melinda L Moir, Inara R Leal, Alan N Andersen","doi":"10.1007/s00442-024-05628-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fire is a major disturbance affecting ecosystems globally, but its impact on mutualisms has received minimal attention. Here, we use a long-term field experiment to investigate the impact of different fire regimes on globally important ant-honeydew and ant-extrafloral nectar (EFN) mutualistic interactions in an Australian tropical savanna. These interactions provide ants with a key energy source, while their plant and hemipteran hosts receive protection services. We examined ant interactions on species of Eucalyptus (lacking EFNs) and Acacia (with EFNs) in three replicate plots each of burning every 2 and 3 years early in the dry season, burning late in the dry season every 2 years, and unburnt for > 25 years. The proportions of plants with ant-honeydew interactions in Acacia (44.6%) and Eucalyptus (36.3%) were double those of Acacia plants with ant-EFN interactions (18.9%). The most common ants, representing 85% of all interactions, were behaviourally dominant species of Oecophylla, Iridomyrmex and Papyrius. Fire promoted the incidence of ant interactions, especially those involving EFNs on Acacia, which occurred on only 3% of plants in unburnt plots compared with 24% in frequently burnt plots. Fire also promoted the relative incidence of behaviourally dominant ants, which are considered the highest quality mutualists. Contrary to expectations, frequent fire did not result in a switching of behaviourally dominant ant partners from forest-adapted Oecophylla to arid-adapted Iridomyrmex. Our findings that frequent fire increases ant interactions mediated by honeydew and extrafloral nectar, and promotes the quality of ant mutualists, have important implications for protective services provided by ants in highly fire-prone ecosystems.</p>","PeriodicalId":19473,"journal":{"name":"Oecologia","volume":" ","pages":"175-186"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11489274/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oecologia","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-024-05628-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fire is a major disturbance affecting ecosystems globally, but its impact on mutualisms has received minimal attention. Here, we use a long-term field experiment to investigate the impact of different fire regimes on globally important ant-honeydew and ant-extrafloral nectar (EFN) mutualistic interactions in an Australian tropical savanna. These interactions provide ants with a key energy source, while their plant and hemipteran hosts receive protection services. We examined ant interactions on species of Eucalyptus (lacking EFNs) and Acacia (with EFNs) in three replicate plots each of burning every 2 and 3 years early in the dry season, burning late in the dry season every 2 years, and unburnt for > 25 years. The proportions of plants with ant-honeydew interactions in Acacia (44.6%) and Eucalyptus (36.3%) were double those of Acacia plants with ant-EFN interactions (18.9%). The most common ants, representing 85% of all interactions, were behaviourally dominant species of Oecophylla, Iridomyrmex and Papyrius. Fire promoted the incidence of ant interactions, especially those involving EFNs on Acacia, which occurred on only 3% of plants in unburnt plots compared with 24% in frequently burnt plots. Fire also promoted the relative incidence of behaviourally dominant ants, which are considered the highest quality mutualists. Contrary to expectations, frequent fire did not result in a switching of behaviourally dominant ant partners from forest-adapted Oecophylla to arid-adapted Iridomyrmex. Our findings that frequent fire increases ant interactions mediated by honeydew and extrafloral nectar, and promotes the quality of ant mutualists, have important implications for protective services provided by ants in highly fire-prone ecosystems.

澳大利亚热带稀树草原上以蜜露和花蜜为媒介的火与蚂蚁的相互作用
火灾是影响全球生态系统的一种主要干扰,但它对互生关系的影响却很少受到关注。在这里,我们利用一个长期的野外实验来研究不同的火灾制度对澳大利亚热带稀树草原中具有全球重要意义的蚂蚁-蜜露和蚂蚁-花蜜(EFN)互生作用的影响。这些相互作用为蚂蚁提供了重要的能量来源,同时它们的植物和半翅目寄主也得到了保护服务。我们考察了桉树(缺乏 EFN)和金合欢树(具有 EFN)物种上的蚂蚁相互作用,分别在旱季早期每 2 年和 3 年焚烧一次、旱季晚期每 2 年焚烧一次以及 25 年以上未焚烧的三个重复地块中进行。相思树(44.6%)和桉树(36.3%)中蚂蚁-蜜露相互作用的植物比例是相思树中蚂蚁-EFN相互作用植物比例(18.9%)的两倍。最常见的蚂蚁(占所有交互作用的 85%)是 Oecophylla、Iridomyrmex 和 Papyrius 等行为优势物种。火灾提高了蚂蚁相互作用的发生率,尤其是金合欢上涉及 EFN 的蚂蚁,在未烧毁的地块中,仅有 3% 的植物上发生了 EFN,而在经常烧毁的地块中,则有 24% 的植物上发生了 EFN。火灾还提高了行为优势蚂蚁的相对发生率,这些蚂蚁被认为是最高质量的互助者。与预期相反,频繁的火灾并没有导致行为优势蚂蚁伙伴从适应森林的 Oecophylla 转向适应干旱的 Iridomyrmex。我们的研究结果表明,频繁的火灾增加了以蜜露和花蜜为媒介的蚂蚁互动,并提高了蚂蚁互助者的质量,这对蚂蚁在火灾频发的生态系统中提供保护服务具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oecologia
Oecologia 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
192
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Oecologia publishes innovative ecological research of international interest. We seek reviews, advances in methodology, and original contributions, emphasizing the following areas: Population ecology, Plant-microbe-animal interactions, Ecosystem ecology, Community ecology, Global change ecology, Conservation ecology, Behavioral ecology and Physiological Ecology. In general, studies that are purely descriptive, mathematical, documentary, and/or natural history will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信