Neuromuscular characteristics of eccentric, concentric and isometric contractions of the knee extensors.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY
European Journal of Applied Physiology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-05 DOI:10.1007/s00421-024-05626-9
Cassio V Ruas, Janet L Taylor, Christopher Latella, G Gregory Haff, Kazunori Nosaka
{"title":"Neuromuscular characteristics of eccentric, concentric and isometric contractions of the knee extensors.","authors":"Cassio V Ruas, Janet L Taylor, Christopher Latella, G Gregory Haff, Kazunori Nosaka","doi":"10.1007/s00421-024-05626-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We compared voluntary drive and corticospinal responses during eccentric (ECC), isometric (ISOM) and concentric (CON) muscle contractions to shed light on neurophysiological mechanisms underpinning the lower voluntary drive in a greater force production in ECC than other contractions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixteen participants (20-33 years) performed ISOM and isokinetic (30°/s) CON and ECC knee extensor contractions (110°-40° knee flexion) in which electromyographic activity (EMG) was recorded from vastus lateralis. Voluntary activation (VA) was measured during ISOM, CON and ECC maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs). Transcranial magnetic stimulation elicited motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) and corticospinal silent periods (CSP) during MVCs and submaximal (30%) contractions, and short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) in submaximal contractions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MVC torque was greater (P < 0.01) during ECC (302.6 ± 90.0 Nm) than ISOM (269.8 ± 81.5 Nm) and CON (235.4 ± 78.6 Nm), but VA was lower (P < 0.01) for ECC (68.4 ± 14.9%) than ISOM (78.3 ± 13.1%) and CON (80.7 ± 15.4%). In addition, EMG/torque was lower (P < 0.02) for ECC (1.9 ± 1.1 μV<sup>.</sup>Nm<sup>-1</sup>) than ISOM (2.2 ± 1.2 μV.Nm<sup>-1</sup>) and CON (2.7 ± 1.6 μV<sup>.</sup>Nm<sup>-1</sup>), CSP was shorter (p < 0.04) for ECC (0.097 ± 0.03 s) than ISOM (0.109 ± 0.02 s) and CON (0.109 ± 0.03 s), and MEP amplitude was lower (P < 0.01) for ECC (3.46 ± 1.67 mV) than ISOM (4.21 ± 2.33 mV) and CON (4.01 ± 2.06 mV). Similar results were found for EMG/torque and CSP during 30% contractions, but MEP and SICI showed no differences among contractions (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The lower voluntary drive indicated by reduced VA during ECC may be partly explained by lower corticospinal excitability, while the shorter CSP may reflect extra muscle spindle excitation of the motoneurons from vastus lateralis muscle lengthening.</p>","PeriodicalId":12005,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","volume":" ","pages":"671-686"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11889023/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-024-05626-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We compared voluntary drive and corticospinal responses during eccentric (ECC), isometric (ISOM) and concentric (CON) muscle contractions to shed light on neurophysiological mechanisms underpinning the lower voluntary drive in a greater force production in ECC than other contractions.

Methods: Sixteen participants (20-33 years) performed ISOM and isokinetic (30°/s) CON and ECC knee extensor contractions (110°-40° knee flexion) in which electromyographic activity (EMG) was recorded from vastus lateralis. Voluntary activation (VA) was measured during ISOM, CON and ECC maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs). Transcranial magnetic stimulation elicited motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) and corticospinal silent periods (CSP) during MVCs and submaximal (30%) contractions, and short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) in submaximal contractions.

Results: MVC torque was greater (P < 0.01) during ECC (302.6 ± 90.0 Nm) than ISOM (269.8 ± 81.5 Nm) and CON (235.4 ± 78.6 Nm), but VA was lower (P < 0.01) for ECC (68.4 ± 14.9%) than ISOM (78.3 ± 13.1%) and CON (80.7 ± 15.4%). In addition, EMG/torque was lower (P < 0.02) for ECC (1.9 ± 1.1 μV.Nm-1) than ISOM (2.2 ± 1.2 μV.Nm-1) and CON (2.7 ± 1.6 μV.Nm-1), CSP was shorter (p < 0.04) for ECC (0.097 ± 0.03 s) than ISOM (0.109 ± 0.02 s) and CON (0.109 ± 0.03 s), and MEP amplitude was lower (P < 0.01) for ECC (3.46 ± 1.67 mV) than ISOM (4.21 ± 2.33 mV) and CON (4.01 ± 2.06 mV). Similar results were found for EMG/torque and CSP during 30% contractions, but MEP and SICI showed no differences among contractions (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: The lower voluntary drive indicated by reduced VA during ECC may be partly explained by lower corticospinal excitability, while the shorter CSP may reflect extra muscle spindle excitation of the motoneurons from vastus lateralis muscle lengthening.

膝关节伸肌偏心、同心和等长收缩的神经肌肉特征。
目的:我们比较了偏心肌收缩(ECC)、等长肌收缩(ISOM)和同心肌收缩(CON)时的自主驱动力和皮质脊髓反应,以揭示 ECC 比其他收缩产生更大力量时自主驱动力较低的神经生理机制:16 名参与者(20-33 岁)进行了 ISOM 和等速(30°/s)CON 和 ECC 膝关节伸肌收缩(膝关节屈曲 110°-40°),并记录了侧肌的肌电活动(EMG)。在 ISOM、CON 和 ECC 最大自主收缩 (MVC) 期间测量自主激活 (VA)。经颅磁刺激可在 MVC 和次最大(30%)收缩时诱发运动诱发电位(MEPs)和皮质脊髓沉默期(CSP),并在次最大收缩时诱发短间隙皮质内抑制(SICI):MVC 扭矩比 ISOM(2.2 ± 1.2 μV.Nm-1)和 CON(2.7 ± 1.6 μV.Nm-1)大(P .Nm-1),CSP 更短(P 0.05):结论:ECC 期间 VA 减少所显示的较低自主驱动力可能部分归因于皮质脊髓兴奋性较低,而较短的 CSP 可能反映了阔筋膜肌肉延长对运动神经元的额外肌纺锤体兴奋。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
227
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Applied Physiology (EJAP) aims to promote mechanistic advances in human integrative and translational physiology. Physiology is viewed broadly, having overlapping context with related disciplines such as biomechanics, biochemistry, endocrinology, ergonomics, immunology, motor control, and nutrition. EJAP welcomes studies dealing with physical exercise, training and performance. Studies addressing physiological mechanisms are preferred over descriptive studies. Papers dealing with animal models or pathophysiological conditions are not excluded from consideration, but must be clearly relevant to human physiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信