The Unseen Shift: How Partnership Long-Term Care Insurance Influences Caregiving Among Older Adults.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Xianhua Zai
{"title":"The Unseen Shift: How Partnership Long-Term Care Insurance Influences Caregiving Among Older Adults.","authors":"Xianhua Zai","doi":"10.1093/geronb/gbae168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>While the Partnership Long-Term Care Insurance (PLTC) Program was designed to mitigate the low uptake of long-term care insurance and reduce Medicaid's financial burden, research has predominantly focused on its direct impacts, leaving the effects on informal caregiving unexplored. This study aimed to investigate how the program alters the dynamics of family-provided care, leveraging nationally representative data to unveil the broader consequences on informal caregiving arrangements among older individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data for this study were sourced from the U.S. Health and Retirement Study (1992-2018) and linked with the timing of the PLTC program implementation across states. The analysis compared individuals exposed to the program with those who were not, employing two-way-fixed-effects and dynamic models to assess its impact on long-term care insurance coverage and reliance on informal caregiving.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The program positively affected long-term care insurance coverage, increasing insurance uptake among older individuals in the long run. Conversely, a significant negative effect was observed on the receipt of assistance from any helper, indicating a reduced reliance on informal care. This reduction extended specifically to family helpers and children's assistance with activities of daily living. The analysis suggests that the program effectively reduced the necessity for informal caregiving across several domains.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These findings highlight the program's potential to reshape caregiving dynamics, suggesting the need for policies that balance promoting private insurance uptake with the implications for family caregiving roles. Policymakers should consider both the economic benefits and the social shifts induced by such programs in the long-term care landscape.</p>","PeriodicalId":56111,"journal":{"name":"Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbae168","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: While the Partnership Long-Term Care Insurance (PLTC) Program was designed to mitigate the low uptake of long-term care insurance and reduce Medicaid's financial burden, research has predominantly focused on its direct impacts, leaving the effects on informal caregiving unexplored. This study aimed to investigate how the program alters the dynamics of family-provided care, leveraging nationally representative data to unveil the broader consequences on informal caregiving arrangements among older individuals.

Methods: Data for this study were sourced from the U.S. Health and Retirement Study (1992-2018) and linked with the timing of the PLTC program implementation across states. The analysis compared individuals exposed to the program with those who were not, employing two-way-fixed-effects and dynamic models to assess its impact on long-term care insurance coverage and reliance on informal caregiving.

Results: The program positively affected long-term care insurance coverage, increasing insurance uptake among older individuals in the long run. Conversely, a significant negative effect was observed on the receipt of assistance from any helper, indicating a reduced reliance on informal care. This reduction extended specifically to family helpers and children's assistance with activities of daily living. The analysis suggests that the program effectively reduced the necessity for informal caregiving across several domains.

Discussion: These findings highlight the program's potential to reshape caregiving dynamics, suggesting the need for policies that balance promoting private insurance uptake with the implications for family caregiving roles. Policymakers should consider both the economic benefits and the social shifts induced by such programs in the long-term care landscape.

看不见的转变:长期护理保险伙伴关系如何影响老年人的护理工作。
目标:尽管长期护理保险合作计划(PLTC)旨在缓解长期护理保险的使用率低的问题并减轻医疗补助计划的财政负担,但研究主要集中在其直接影响上,而对非正式护理的影响却未作深入探讨。本研究旨在调查该计划如何改变家庭提供护理的动态,利用具有全国代表性的数据揭示其对老年人非正式护理安排的广泛影响:本研究的数据来源于美国健康与退休研究(1992-2018 年),并与各州 PLTC 计划的实施时间相关联。分析采用双向固定效应模型和动态模型,对参与该计划的个人和未参与该计划的个人进行比较,以评估其对长期护理保险覆盖率和对非正式护理依赖的影响:结果:该计划对长期护理保险的覆盖率产生了积极影响,从长远来看提高了老年人的保险覆盖率。相反,该计划对接受任何帮助者的援助产生了明显的负面影响,表明对非正式护理的依赖性降低。这种减少特别延伸到家庭帮手和子女对日常生活的帮助。分析表明,该计划有效地减少了多个领域对非正式护理的需求:这些发现凸显了该计划重塑护理动态的潜力,表明有必要制定政策,在促进私人保险的使用与对家庭护理角色的影响之间取得平衡。政策制定者应同时考虑此类计划在长期护理领域带来的经济效益和社会转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.10%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences publishes articles on development in adulthood and old age that advance the psychological science of aging processes and outcomes. Articles have clear implications for theoretical or methodological innovation in the psychology of aging or contribute significantly to the empirical understanding of psychological processes and aging. Areas of interest include, but are not limited to, attitudes, clinical applications, cognition, education, emotion, health, human factors, interpersonal relations, neuropsychology, perception, personality, physiological psychology, social psychology, and sensation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信