Strain Patterns With Ultrasound for Assessment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Vessel Wall Biomechanics

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ACOUSTICS
Ulver S. Lorenzen , Marta I. Bracco , Alexander H. Zielinski , Magdalena Broda , Stéphane Avril , Laurence Rouet , Jonas P. Eiberg , The COACH Research Collaborative
{"title":"Strain Patterns With Ultrasound for Assessment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Vessel Wall Biomechanics","authors":"Ulver S. Lorenzen ,&nbsp;Marta I. Bracco ,&nbsp;Alexander H. Zielinski ,&nbsp;Magdalena Broda ,&nbsp;Stéphane Avril ,&nbsp;Laurence Rouet ,&nbsp;Jonas P. Eiberg ,&nbsp;The COACH Research Collaborative","doi":"10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2024.09.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) are an important cause of death. Small AAAs are surveyed with ultrasound (US) until a defined diameter threshold, often triggering a computer tomography scan and surgical repair. Nevertheless, 5%–10% of AAA ruptures are below threshold, and some large AAAs never rupture. AAA wall biomechanics may reveal vessel wall degradation with potential for patient-centred risk assessment. This clinical study investigated AAA vessel wall biomechanics and deformation patterns, including reproducibility.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In 50 patients with AAA, 183 video clips were recorded by two sonographers. Prototype software extracted AAA vessel wall principal strain characteristics and patterns. Functional principal component analysis (FPCA) derived strain pattern statistics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Strain patterns demonstrated reduced AAA wall strains close to the spine. The strain pattern “topography” (i.e., curve phases or “peaks” and “valleys”) had a 3.9 times lower variance than simple numeric assessment of strain amplitudes, which allowed for clustering in two groups with FPCA. A high mean reproducibility of these clusters of 87.6% was found. Median pulse pressure-normalised mean principal strain (PPPS) was 0.038%/mm Hg (interquartile range: 0.029–0.051%/mm Hg) with no correlation to AAA size (Spearman's <em>ρ</em> = 0.02, false discovery rate-<em>p</em> = 0.15). Inter-operator reproducibility of PPPS was poor (limits of agreement: ±0.031%/mm Hg).</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Strain patterns challenge previous numeric stiffness measures based on anterior-posterior-diameter and are reproducible for clustering. This study's PPPS aligned with prior findings, although clinical reproducibility was poor. In contrast, US-based strain patterns hold promising potential to enhance AAA risk assessment beyond traditional diameter-based metrics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49399,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301562924003570","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) are an important cause of death. Small AAAs are surveyed with ultrasound (US) until a defined diameter threshold, often triggering a computer tomography scan and surgical repair. Nevertheless, 5%–10% of AAA ruptures are below threshold, and some large AAAs never rupture. AAA wall biomechanics may reveal vessel wall degradation with potential for patient-centred risk assessment. This clinical study investigated AAA vessel wall biomechanics and deformation patterns, including reproducibility.

Methods

In 50 patients with AAA, 183 video clips were recorded by two sonographers. Prototype software extracted AAA vessel wall principal strain characteristics and patterns. Functional principal component analysis (FPCA) derived strain pattern statistics.

Results

Strain patterns demonstrated reduced AAA wall strains close to the spine. The strain pattern “topography” (i.e., curve phases or “peaks” and “valleys”) had a 3.9 times lower variance than simple numeric assessment of strain amplitudes, which allowed for clustering in two groups with FPCA. A high mean reproducibility of these clusters of 87.6% was found. Median pulse pressure-normalised mean principal strain (PPPS) was 0.038%/mm Hg (interquartile range: 0.029–0.051%/mm Hg) with no correlation to AAA size (Spearman's ρ = 0.02, false discovery rate-p = 0.15). Inter-operator reproducibility of PPPS was poor (limits of agreement: ±0.031%/mm Hg).

Discussion

Strain patterns challenge previous numeric stiffness measures based on anterior-posterior-diameter and are reproducible for clustering. This study's PPPS aligned with prior findings, although clinical reproducibility was poor. In contrast, US-based strain patterns hold promising potential to enhance AAA risk assessment beyond traditional diameter-based metrics.
利用超声波应变模式评估腹主动脉瘤血管壁生物力学。
背景:腹主动脉瘤(AAA)是导致死亡的重要原因。通过超声波(US)检查小的 AAA,直到达到规定的直径阈值,通常会进行计算机断层扫描和手术修复。然而,5%-10% 的 AAA 破裂低于阈值,有些大的 AAA 从未破裂。AAA 血管壁生物力学可揭示血管壁退化情况,从而为以患者为中心的风险评估提供依据。这项临床研究调查了 AAA 血管壁生物力学和变形模式,包括再现性:方法:由两名超声技师对 50 名 AAA 患者的 183 个视频片段进行记录。原型软件提取 AAA 血管壁主应变特征和模式。功能主成分分析(FPCA)得出应变模式统计数据:结果:应变模式显示靠近脊柱的 AAA 壁应变减少。应变模式 "地形"(即曲线相位或 "峰 "和 "谷")的方差比应变振幅的简单数值评估低 3.9 倍,因此可通过 FPCA 将应变模式分为两组。这些聚类的平均重现性高达 87.6%。脉压归一化平均主应变(PPPS)的中位数为 0.038%/mmHg(四分位间范围:0.029-0.051%/mmHg),与 AAA 大小无关(Spearman's ρ = 0.02,假发现率-p = 0.15)。PPPS 的术者间可重复性很差(一致性极限:±0.031%/mm Hg):讨论:应变模式挑战了以往基于前-后-直径的数字僵硬度测量方法,并具有聚类的可重复性。本研究的 PPPS 与之前的研究结果一致,但临床可重复性较差。相比之下,基于 US 的应变模式在增强 AAA 风险评估方面具有超越传统的基于直径的指标的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.90%
发文量
325
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology is the official journal of the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. The journal publishes original contributions that demonstrate a novel application of an existing ultrasound technology in clinical diagnostic, interventional and therapeutic applications, new and improved clinical techniques, the physics, engineering and technology of ultrasound in medicine and biology, and the interactions between ultrasound and biological systems, including bioeffects. Papers that simply utilize standard diagnostic ultrasound as a measuring tool will be considered out of scope. Extended critical reviews of subjects of contemporary interest in the field are also published, in addition to occasional editorial articles, clinical and technical notes, book reviews, letters to the editor and a calendar of forthcoming meetings. It is the aim of the journal fully to meet the information and publication requirements of the clinicians, scientists, engineers and other professionals who constitute the biomedical ultrasonic community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信