A systematic review of attachment interventions for people with intellectual disability and their caregivers.

IF 1.5 4区医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL

Journal of Intellectual Disabilities Pub Date : 2024-10-04 DOI:10.1177/17446295241289734

Ruby Ramsden, Emily Reeves, Eve Whitwell, Nicola Lane, Helen K Fletcher

{"title":"A systematic review of attachment interventions for people with intellectual disability and their caregivers.","authors":"Ruby Ramsden, Emily Reeves, Eve Whitwell, Nicola Lane, Helen K Fletcher","doi":"10.1177/17446295241289734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The current mixed-methods systematic review evaluated available literature to find out which attachment-based interventions have been implemented for people with intellectual disability and whether they are efficacious and acceptable.Methods: Five databases were searched (in July 2023 and April 2024), using terms related to intellectual disability and attachment-based interventions. The search yielded 793 papers; 15 papers (13 studies) met inclusion criteria. Relevant data was extracted from each study. Paper quality was appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Findings were synthesised in an integrative review.Results: Of the included studies, 7 had people with intellectual disability as participants and 6 had their caregivers. Interventions included education, psychotherapy, technology assisted therapy, video interaction guidance/feedback and circle of security. Research methods varied.Conclusions: Evidence for efficacy and acceptability of interventions was mixed but promising. Most studies had limited generalisability. Therefore, further research is required. Pre-registration with PROSPERO [351287].","PeriodicalId":46904,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":"17446295241289734"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17446295241289734","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The current mixed-methods systematic review evaluated available literature to find out which attachment-based interventions have been implemented for people with intellectual disability and whether they are efficacious and acceptable.

Methods: Five databases were searched (in July 2023 and April 2024), using terms related to intellectual disability and attachment-based interventions. The search yielded 793 papers; 15 papers (13 studies) met inclusion criteria. Relevant data was extracted from each study. Paper quality was appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Findings were synthesised in an integrative review.

Results: Of the included studies, 7 had people with intellectual disability as participants and 6 had their caregivers. Interventions included education, psychotherapy, technology assisted therapy, video interaction guidance/feedback and circle of security. Research methods varied.

Conclusions: Evidence for efficacy and acceptability of interventions was mixed but promising. Most studies had limited generalisability. Therefore, further research is required. Pre-registration with PROSPERO [351287].

查看原文本刊更多论文

针对智障人士及其照顾者的依恋干预措施的系统性回顾。

目的本次混合方法系统性综述对现有文献进行了评估，以了解针对智障人士实施了哪些基于依恋的干预措施，以及这些干预措施是否有效和可接受：使用与智障和依恋干预相关的术语，检索了五个数据库（2023 年 7 月和 2024 年 4 月）。检索结果显示有 793 篇论文；15 篇论文（13 项研究）符合纳入标准。从每项研究中提取了相关数据。采用混合方法评估工具对论文质量进行评估。结果：在纳入的研究中，7 项研究的参与者为智障人士，6 项研究的参与者为智障人士的照顾者。干预措施包括教育、心理治疗、技术辅助治疗、视频互动指导/反馈和安全圈。研究方法各不相同：干预措施的有效性和可接受性证据不一，但都很有希望。大多数研究的普遍性有限。因此，还需要进一步的研究。PROSPERO [351287] 预注册。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Intellectual Disabilities Multiple-

CiteScore

3.40

自引率

13.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： The principal aim of the journal is to provide a medium for the exchange of best practice, knowledge and research between academic and professional disciplines from education, social and health settings to bring about advancement of services for people with intellectual disabilities. The idea of a practice-led journal is both exciting and timely. This journal serves as a medium for all those involved with people with intellectual disabilities to submit and publish papers on issues relevant to promoting services for people with intellectual disabilities.