Moral values and vaccination behavior in Russia during the COVID-19 pandemic

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
{"title":"Moral values and vaccination behavior in Russia during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.108143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Effective persuasive communication necessitates message matching; the conveyed message should resonate with the recipient's characteristics, including individual moral values. While studies examining the relationship between moral values and vaccination behavior have been conducted in a limited number of countries, this study seeks to provide evidence on this relationship beyond Western democracies.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional online survey was conducted from November 4 to December 17, 2021, in Russia. Participants reported their COVID-19 vaccination behavior and completed the Moral Foundations Questionnaire, designed to measure the endorsement of moral values (<em>n</em> = 415). Regression analysis was employed to assess the association between each moral foundation and COVID-19 vaccination behavior.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our findings indicate that the moral foundations of Care, Loyalty, Fairness, and Sanctity significantly influence vaccination behavior. Individuals who strongly endorse Fairness (AME = −0.019; 95 % CI = −0.033, −0.005) and Sanctity (AME = −0.016; 95 % CI = −0.031, −0.002) were less likely to be vaccinated. Conversely, individuals endorsing Care (AME = −0.018; 95 % CI = −0.031, −0.005) and Loyalty (AME = −0.015; 95 % CI = −0.028, −0.001) were less likely to report refusal of vaccination. These results remain robust after adjusting for sociodemographic variables related to vaccination barriers.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our findings carry public health implications; an understanding of the moral psychology underlying vaccination behavior can facilitate more targeted and effective health communication. Employing skillfully crafted moral appeals may mitigate negative attitudes toward vaccination and enhance vaccination rates.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20339,"journal":{"name":"Preventive medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091743524002986","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Effective persuasive communication necessitates message matching; the conveyed message should resonate with the recipient's characteristics, including individual moral values. While studies examining the relationship between moral values and vaccination behavior have been conducted in a limited number of countries, this study seeks to provide evidence on this relationship beyond Western democracies.

Methods

A cross-sectional online survey was conducted from November 4 to December 17, 2021, in Russia. Participants reported their COVID-19 vaccination behavior and completed the Moral Foundations Questionnaire, designed to measure the endorsement of moral values (n = 415). Regression analysis was employed to assess the association between each moral foundation and COVID-19 vaccination behavior.

Results

Our findings indicate that the moral foundations of Care, Loyalty, Fairness, and Sanctity significantly influence vaccination behavior. Individuals who strongly endorse Fairness (AME = −0.019; 95 % CI = −0.033, −0.005) and Sanctity (AME = −0.016; 95 % CI = −0.031, −0.002) were less likely to be vaccinated. Conversely, individuals endorsing Care (AME = −0.018; 95 % CI = −0.031, −0.005) and Loyalty (AME = −0.015; 95 % CI = −0.028, −0.001) were less likely to report refusal of vaccination. These results remain robust after adjusting for sociodemographic variables related to vaccination barriers.

Conclusion

Our findings carry public health implications; an understanding of the moral psychology underlying vaccination behavior can facilitate more targeted and effective health communication. Employing skillfully crafted moral appeals may mitigate negative attitudes toward vaccination and enhance vaccination rates.
COVID-19 大流行期间俄罗斯的道德价值观和疫苗接种行为。
目标有效的说服性传播必须与信息相匹配;传达的信息应与接受者的特点(包括个人道德价值观)产生共鸣。尽管对道德价值观与疫苗接种行为之间关系的研究只在少数国家进行,但本研究试图为西方民主国家以外的国家提供有关这种关系的证据:方法:2021 年 11 月 4 日至 12 月 17 日在俄罗斯进行了一项横断面在线调查。参与者报告了他们的 COVID-19 疫苗接种行为,并填写了道德基础问卷,该问卷旨在测量道德价值观的认可度(n = 415)。我们采用回归分析法评估了每种道德基础与 COVID-19 疫苗接种行为之间的关联:结果:我们的研究结果表明,"关爱"、"忠诚"、"公平 "和 "神圣 "等道德基础对疫苗接种行为有显著影响。强烈支持公平(AME = -0.019;95 % CI = -0.033,-0.005)和神圣(AME = -0.016;95 % CI = -0.031,-0.002)的人接种疫苗的可能性较低。相反,支持 "关怀"(AME = -0.018; 95 % CI = -0.031, -0.005)和 "忠诚"(AME = -0.015; 95 % CI = -0.028, -0.001)的人则不太可能拒绝接种疫苗。在对与疫苗接种障碍有关的社会人口变量进行调整后,这些结果仍然是稳健的:我们的研究结果具有公共卫生方面的意义;了解疫苗接种行为背后的道德心理可以促进更有针对性、更有效的健康传播。巧妙地运用道德诉求可以减轻人们对疫苗接种的负面态度,提高疫苗接种率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Preventive medicine
Preventive medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
3.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Founded in 1972 by Ernst Wynder, Preventive Medicine is an international scholarly journal that provides prompt publication of original articles on the science and practice of disease prevention, health promotion, and public health policymaking. Preventive Medicine aims to reward innovation. It will favor insightful observational studies, thoughtful explorations of health data, unsuspected new angles for existing hypotheses, robust randomized controlled trials, and impartial systematic reviews. Preventive Medicine''s ultimate goal is to publish research that will have an impact on the work of practitioners of disease prevention and health promotion, as well as of related disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信