Guided bone regeneration-associated tissue swelling: A digital three-dimensional assessment.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Vrisiis Kofina, Morvarid Monfaredzadeh, Swati Y Rawal, Andrew R Dentino, Maharaj Singh, Dimitris N Tatakis
{"title":"Guided bone regeneration-associated tissue swelling: A digital three-dimensional assessment.","authors":"Vrisiis Kofina, Morvarid Monfaredzadeh, Swati Y Rawal, Andrew R Dentino, Maharaj Singh, Dimitris N Tatakis","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.09.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Statement of problem: </strong>Postoperative swelling following guided bone regeneration (GBR) may affect the dimensions of interim restorations and/or delivery timing. However, quantitative assessment of post-GBR swelling or its evaluation for possible impact on regenerative outcomes is lacking.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this prospective clinical study was to quantify post-GBR swelling and correlate it with clinical parameters and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Participants (n=25) undergoing standardized extraction and GBR protocol were recruited. Site-specific swelling was measured as ridge width, height, and volume changes based on intraoral scans recorded preoperatively, immediately postoperatively (IP), and at 2 days, 7 days, 14 days, and 4 months. The parameters and outcomes assessed were gingival and mucosal thickness, flap advancement, surgery duration, wound opening, and bone gain. The Friedman 2-way analysis of variance by ranks was performed, and the Spearman correlation coefficients (ρ) were computed (α=.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ridge width and height peaked at 2 days (2.1 mm for both from IP; P<.001 for both) and reached IP levels by 7 days and 14 days (P>.999 and P=.888, respectively). At 4 months, both decreased significantly compared with IP (-4.2 mm and -1.9 mm respectively, P<.001). Volume increases peaked at 2 days (19%, P<.001), and peak swelling (2 days) preceded maximum wound opening (7 days). Bone width at 4 months was correlated with gingival thickness (ρ=0.45, P=.043), mucosal thickness (ρ=0.51, P=.021), and flap advancement (ρ=0.58, P=.008).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Following GBR, site-specific swelling peaked on postoperative day 2 and subsided by day 7 (width) or 14 (height). Soft tissue thickness and flap advancement affected post-GBR bone width.</p>","PeriodicalId":16866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.09.009","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Statement of problem: Postoperative swelling following guided bone regeneration (GBR) may affect the dimensions of interim restorations and/or delivery timing. However, quantitative assessment of post-GBR swelling or its evaluation for possible impact on regenerative outcomes is lacking.

Purpose: The purpose of this prospective clinical study was to quantify post-GBR swelling and correlate it with clinical parameters and outcomes.

Material and methods: Participants (n=25) undergoing standardized extraction and GBR protocol were recruited. Site-specific swelling was measured as ridge width, height, and volume changes based on intraoral scans recorded preoperatively, immediately postoperatively (IP), and at 2 days, 7 days, 14 days, and 4 months. The parameters and outcomes assessed were gingival and mucosal thickness, flap advancement, surgery duration, wound opening, and bone gain. The Friedman 2-way analysis of variance by ranks was performed, and the Spearman correlation coefficients (ρ) were computed (α=.05).

Results: Ridge width and height peaked at 2 days (2.1 mm for both from IP; P<.001 for both) and reached IP levels by 7 days and 14 days (P>.999 and P=.888, respectively). At 4 months, both decreased significantly compared with IP (-4.2 mm and -1.9 mm respectively, P<.001). Volume increases peaked at 2 days (19%, P<.001), and peak swelling (2 days) preceded maximum wound opening (7 days). Bone width at 4 months was correlated with gingival thickness (ρ=0.45, P=.043), mucosal thickness (ρ=0.51, P=.021), and flap advancement (ρ=0.58, P=.008).

Conclusions: Following GBR, site-specific swelling peaked on postoperative day 2 and subsided by day 7 (width) or 14 (height). Soft tissue thickness and flap advancement affected post-GBR bone width.

引导骨再生相关组织肿胀:数字三维评估
问题陈述:引导骨再生(GBR)术后肿胀可能会影响临时修复体的尺寸和/或交付时间。目的:本前瞻性临床研究的目的是量化引导骨再生术后肿胀,并将其与临床参数和结果相关联:材料:招募了接受标准化拔牙和GBR方案的参与者(n=25)。根据术前、术后即刻(IP)、术后 2 天、7 天、14 天和 4 个月的口内扫描记录,以牙脊宽度、高度和体积的变化来测量特定部位的肿胀。评估的参数和结果包括牙龈和粘膜厚度、皮瓣推进、手术时间、伤口开放和骨量增加。进行了弗里德曼双向等级方差分析,并计算了斯皮尔曼相关系数(ρ)(α=.05):脊宽和脊高在 2 天时达到峰值(与 IP 相比均为 2.1 毫米;P.999 和 P=.888)。4 个月后,这两项指标与 IP 相比均明显下降(分别为-4.2 毫米和-1.9 毫米,PC 结论:GBR 术后,特定部位的肿胀在术后第 2 天达到高峰,在第 7 天(宽度)或第 14 天(高度)消退。软组织厚度和皮瓣前移影响了 GBR 术后的骨宽度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
599
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is the leading professional journal devoted exclusively to prosthetic and restorative dentistry. The Journal is the official publication for 24 leading U.S. international prosthodontic organizations. The monthly publication features timely, original peer-reviewed articles on the newest techniques, dental materials, and research findings. The Journal serves prosthodontists and dentists in advanced practice, and features color photos that illustrate many step-by-step procedures. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is included in Index Medicus and CINAHL.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信