'You Can Die With Me But I Won't Let You Live With Me', Exploring Social Influences on the Continuation of Heroin Use in Men Who Use Heroin.

Substance use : research and treatment Pub Date : 2024-09-28 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/29768357241276320
Ben Houghton, Christos Kouimtsidis, Theodora Duka, Yannis Paloyelis, Alexis Bailey, Caitlin Notley
{"title":"'You Can Die With Me But I Won't Let You Live With Me', Exploring Social Influences on the Continuation of Heroin Use in Men Who Use Heroin.","authors":"Ben Houghton, Christos Kouimtsidis, Theodora Duka, Yannis Paloyelis, Alexis Bailey, Caitlin Notley","doi":"10.1177/29768357241276320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Heroin is a substance with a unique social profile in that it is commonly used by individuals alone but there is a paucity of qualitative research exploring how social influences impact the continuation of heroin use, particularly when people are trying to stop using heroin. This study explored social determinants which influence the continuation of heroin use in males in UK community treatment who use illicit heroin alongside opioid replacement therapy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Participants were self-selecting from an initial purposively recruited sample. Using Janis (1972) 8 symptoms of Groupthink as an a priori framework for analysis, the study method utilised qualitative interviews with fourteen males. The discussions were digitally-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed thematically.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Contrasting with the evidence base, the sample included people who transitioned from recreational drug use to dependent heroin use without experiencing trauma of any kind. Far from becoming socially isolated when actively using heroin, interviews identified a shift in social networks from networks built on shared moments to networks underpinned by transactional exchange. Components of Groupthink were identified when participants described belonging to heroin using networks and continued to use heroin whilst trying to abstain though individual accountability was central to the decision to continue to use heroin.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The conflict between the individual goal of abstinence and the group goal of continuation suggests that social network interventions could be more successful if delivered to cohorts of people who buy heroin together.</p>","PeriodicalId":517405,"journal":{"name":"Substance use : research and treatment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11447827/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance use : research and treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/29768357241276320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Heroin is a substance with a unique social profile in that it is commonly used by individuals alone but there is a paucity of qualitative research exploring how social influences impact the continuation of heroin use, particularly when people are trying to stop using heroin. This study explored social determinants which influence the continuation of heroin use in males in UK community treatment who use illicit heroin alongside opioid replacement therapy.

Design: Participants were self-selecting from an initial purposively recruited sample. Using Janis (1972) 8 symptoms of Groupthink as an a priori framework for analysis, the study method utilised qualitative interviews with fourteen males. The discussions were digitally-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed thematically.

Findings: Contrasting with the evidence base, the sample included people who transitioned from recreational drug use to dependent heroin use without experiencing trauma of any kind. Far from becoming socially isolated when actively using heroin, interviews identified a shift in social networks from networks built on shared moments to networks underpinned by transactional exchange. Components of Groupthink were identified when participants described belonging to heroin using networks and continued to use heroin whilst trying to abstain though individual accountability was central to the decision to continue to use heroin.

Conclusions: The conflict between the individual goal of abstinence and the group goal of continuation suggests that social network interventions could be more successful if delivered to cohorts of people who buy heroin together.

你可以和我一起死,但我不会让你和我一起活",探索社会对吸食海洛因男性继续吸食海洛因的影响。
背景:海洛因是一种具有独特社会特征的物质,因为它通常由个人单独使用,但很少有定性研究探讨社会影响因素如何影响海洛因的持续使用,尤其是当人们试图停止使用海洛因时。本研究探讨了影响英国社区治疗中使用非法海洛因和阿片类替代疗法的男性继续使用海洛因的社会决定因素:参与者是从最初有目的招募的样本中自行选择的。研究方法采用 Janis(1972 年)提出的 8 种 "群体思维"(Groupthink)症状作为先验分析框架,对 14 名男性进行定性访谈。对讨论进行了数字录音、逐字记录和主题分析:与证据基础不同的是,样本中的人是从娱乐性吸毒过渡到依赖性海洛因吸毒的,并没有经历过任何创伤。在积极吸食海洛因的过程中,他们并没有变得与世隔绝,访谈发现,他们的社交网络从建立在共同时刻的网络转变为以交易交换为基础的网络。当参与者描述自己属于吸食海洛因的网络,并在试图戒毒的同时继续吸食海洛因时,虽然个人责任是决定是否继续吸食海洛因的关键,但仍发现了群体思维的成分:个人戒毒目标与继续使用海洛因的群体目标之间的冲突表明,如果对共同购买海洛因的人群进行社会网络干预,可能会取得更大的成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信