In vitro models to evaluate multidrug resistance in cancer cells: Biochemical and morphological techniques and pharmacological strategies.

Abstract

The overexpression of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters contributes to the failure of chemotherapies and symbolizes a great challenge in oncology, associated with the adaptation of tumor cells to anticancer drugs such that these transporters become less effective, a mechanism known as multidrug resistance (MDR). The aim of this review is to present the most widely used methodologies for induction and comprehension of in vitro models for detection of multidrug-resistant (MDR) modulators or inhibitors, including biochemical and morphological techniques for chemosensitivity studies. The overexpression of MDR proteins, predominantly, the subfamily glycoprotein-1 (P-gp or ABCB1) multidrug resistance, multidrug resistance-associated protein 1 (MRP1 or ABCCC1), multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 (MRP2 or ABCC2) and cancer resistance protein (ABCG2), in chemotherapy-exposed cancer lines have been established/investigated by several techniques. Amongst these techniques, the most used are (i) colorimetric/fluorescent indirect bioassays, (ii) rhodamine and efflux analysis, (iii) release of 3,30-diethyloxacarbocyanine iodide by fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry to measure P-gp function and other ABC transporters, (iv) exclusion of calcein-acetoxymethylester, (v) ATPase assays to distinguish types of interaction with ABC transporters, (vi) morphology to detail phenotypic characteristics in transformed cells, (vii) molecular testing of resistance-related proteins (RT-qPCR) and (viii) 2D and 3D models, (ix) organoids, and (x) microfluidic technology. Then, in vitro models for detecting chemotherapy MDR cells to assess innovative therapies to modulate or inhibit tumor cell growth and overcome clinical resistance. It is noteworthy that different therapies including anti-miRNAs, antibody-drug conjugates (to natural products), and epigenetic modifications were also considered as promising alternatives, since currently no anti-MDR therapies are able to improve patient quality of life. Therefore, there is also urgency for new clinical markers of resistance to more reliably reflect in vivo effectiveness of novel antitumor drugs.