L. Geoffray , L. Tuchtan , M-D. Piercecchi-Marti , C. Delteil
{"title":"Post-mortem transmission risk of infectious disease: A systematic review","authors":"L. Geoffray , L. Tuchtan , M-D. Piercecchi-Marti , C. Delteil","doi":"10.1016/j.legalmed.2024.102530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Autopsies may expose to infectious risks. The objective of this study is to assess the risk of <em>post-mortem</em> transmission of HIV, HBV, HCV, <em>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</em> (MBT), SARS-CoV2 and prion in the workplace and to estimate the duration of their infectiousness.</div></div><div><h3>Material and method</h3><div>the PRISMA 2020 guideline was used. Pubmed, Web of Science, Google Scholar and Sciencedirect databases were assessed until February 28, 2023. We searched for articles in any language and any date of publication. Studies involving animals, transmission between two living people or transmission outside the workplace were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed using the appropriate assessment tools for each type of study. A descriptive analysis was performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 46 studies were included. Cases of <em>post-mortem</em> transmission were certain for HIV (n = 1) and MBT (n = 18). The longest <em>post-mortem</em> interval for positive diagnostic tests was 17 days for HIV, 60 for HBV, 7 for HCV, 36 for MBT and 17 for SARS-CoV2. The longest <em>post-mortem</em> interval for positive cultures was 21 h for HIV, 6 days for HBV, 36 days for MBT, 17 days for SARS-CoV2. The methodology of the studies was heterogeneous, some of them associated with a high risk of bias.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There is a lack of consistent data in the literature concerning the infectivity of cadavers, except for MBT. Legislation appears to be based on minimizing contact between the biological agent and the professional. In the absence of recent robust scientific data, workers should systematically follow the best practice recommendations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49913,"journal":{"name":"Legal Medicine","volume":"71 ","pages":"Article 102530"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1344622324001408","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Autopsies may expose to infectious risks. The objective of this study is to assess the risk of post-mortem transmission of HIV, HBV, HCV, Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MBT), SARS-CoV2 and prion in the workplace and to estimate the duration of their infectiousness.
Material and method
the PRISMA 2020 guideline was used. Pubmed, Web of Science, Google Scholar and Sciencedirect databases were assessed until February 28, 2023. We searched for articles in any language and any date of publication. Studies involving animals, transmission between two living people or transmission outside the workplace were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed using the appropriate assessment tools for each type of study. A descriptive analysis was performed.
Results
A total of 46 studies were included. Cases of post-mortem transmission were certain for HIV (n = 1) and MBT (n = 18). The longest post-mortem interval for positive diagnostic tests was 17 days for HIV, 60 for HBV, 7 for HCV, 36 for MBT and 17 for SARS-CoV2. The longest post-mortem interval for positive cultures was 21 h for HIV, 6 days for HBV, 36 days for MBT, 17 days for SARS-CoV2. The methodology of the studies was heterogeneous, some of them associated with a high risk of bias.
Conclusion
There is a lack of consistent data in the literature concerning the infectivity of cadavers, except for MBT. Legislation appears to be based on minimizing contact between the biological agent and the professional. In the absence of recent robust scientific data, workers should systematically follow the best practice recommendations.
期刊介绍:
Legal Medicine provides an international forum for the publication of original articles, reviews and correspondence on subjects that cover practical and theoretical areas of interest relating to the wide range of legal medicine.
Subjects covered include forensic pathology, toxicology, odontology, anthropology, criminalistics, immunochemistry, hemogenetics and forensic aspects of biological science with emphasis on DNA analysis and molecular biology. Submissions dealing with medicolegal problems such as malpractice, insurance, child abuse or ethics in medical practice are also acceptable.