Addressing Drug-Drug Interaction Knowledge Gaps at the Time of Approval: An Analysis of FDA Postmarketing Requirements and Commitments from 2009 to 2023.

IF 2.9 4区 医学
Sarah Ridge, Xinning Yang, Rajanikanth Madabushi, Anuradha Ramamoorthy
{"title":"Addressing Drug-Drug Interaction Knowledge Gaps at the Time of Approval: An Analysis of FDA Postmarketing Requirements and Commitments from 2009 to 2023.","authors":"Sarah Ridge, Xinning Yang, Rajanikanth Madabushi, Anuradha Ramamoorthy","doi":"10.1002/jcph.6142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It has become increasingly common for patients to rely on the use of multiple prescription medications. The management of polypharmacy requires careful consideration for how drugs are metabolized and their potential for interaction with other drugs. Drug-drug interaction (DDI) assessments are typically performed in a stepwise manner during drug development, though knowledge gaps can exist at the time of approval. The US Food and Drug Administration can establish postmarketing requirements (PMRs) or postmarketing commitments (PMCs) to address these knowledge gaps. In this study, we systematically evaluated PMRs and PMCs established to new molecular entities (NMEs) at the time of initial approval between 2009 and 2023, for the assessment of pharmacokinetics-based DDIs (i.e., drug metabolizing enzyme- and transporter-related DDIs). We found that 22% of NMEs had at least one DDI-related PMR or PMC, with a total of 263 that were pharmacokinetic based. Of these, 67% were for the assessment of drug metabolizing enzymes, which were established most frequently for their evaluation as a substrate, and 28% for transporters, which were established most frequently for their evaluation as an inhibitor. The 89% of PMRs and PMCs that were considered fulfilled had a revision to the United States prescribing information, the majority of which resulted in updated new instructions for use. This study highlights the value in conducting PMRs and PMCs early in the drug development process allowing broad patient inclusion at the time of initial drug approval.</p>","PeriodicalId":48908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.6142","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It has become increasingly common for patients to rely on the use of multiple prescription medications. The management of polypharmacy requires careful consideration for how drugs are metabolized and their potential for interaction with other drugs. Drug-drug interaction (DDI) assessments are typically performed in a stepwise manner during drug development, though knowledge gaps can exist at the time of approval. The US Food and Drug Administration can establish postmarketing requirements (PMRs) or postmarketing commitments (PMCs) to address these knowledge gaps. In this study, we systematically evaluated PMRs and PMCs established to new molecular entities (NMEs) at the time of initial approval between 2009 and 2023, for the assessment of pharmacokinetics-based DDIs (i.e., drug metabolizing enzyme- and transporter-related DDIs). We found that 22% of NMEs had at least one DDI-related PMR or PMC, with a total of 263 that were pharmacokinetic based. Of these, 67% were for the assessment of drug metabolizing enzymes, which were established most frequently for their evaluation as a substrate, and 28% for transporters, which were established most frequently for their evaluation as an inhibitor. The 89% of PMRs and PMCs that were considered fulfilled had a revision to the United States prescribing information, the majority of which resulted in updated new instructions for use. This study highlights the value in conducting PMRs and PMCs early in the drug development process allowing broad patient inclusion at the time of initial drug approval.

在批准时解决药物相互作用知识差距:美国食品和药物管理局 2009 年至 2023 年上市后要求和承诺分析》(Analysis of FDA Postmarketing Requirements and Commitments from 2009 to 2023)。
患者依赖使用多种处方药的情况越来越普遍。管理多种药物需要仔细考虑药物的代谢方式及其与其他药物相互作用的可能性。药物相互作用(DDI)评估通常在药物开发过程中逐步进行,但在批准时可能存在知识缺口。美国食品和药物管理局可以制定上市后要求(PMR)或上市后承诺(PMC)来弥补这些知识差距。在本研究中,我们系统地评估了 2009 年至 2023 年间新分子实体(NME)在首次获批时制定的 PMR 和 PMC,以评估基于药代动力学的 DDI(即与药物代谢酶和转运体相关的 DDI)。我们发现,22%的NME至少有一项与DDI相关的PMR或PMC,其中基于药代动力学的共有263项。其中,67%用于评估药物代谢酶,最常见的是将其作为底物进行评估;28%用于评估转运体,最常见的是将其作为抑制剂进行评估。89%被认为符合要求的 PMR 和 PMC 都对美国处方信息进行了修订,其中大多数都更新了新的使用说明。这项研究强调了在药物开发过程的早期进行PMR和PMC的价值,这样可以在药物首次批准时将更多的患者纳入其中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Journal of Clinical Pharmacology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
3.40%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (JCP) is a Human Pharmacology journal designed to provide physicians, pharmacists, research scientists, regulatory scientists, drug developers and academic colleagues a forum to present research in all aspects of Clinical Pharmacology. This includes original research in pharmacokinetics, pharmacogenetics/pharmacogenomics, pharmacometrics, physiologic based pharmacokinetic modeling, drug interactions, therapeutic drug monitoring, regulatory sciences (including unique methods of data analysis), special population studies, drug development, pharmacovigilance, womens’ health, pediatric pharmacology, and pharmacodynamics. Additionally, JCP publishes review articles, commentaries and educational manuscripts. The Journal also serves as an instrument to disseminate Public Policy statements from the American College of Clinical Pharmacology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信