A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study of Stratafix versus Standard-of-Care for Deep Tissue Closure in Orthopedic Surgery.

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-13 DOI:10.4055/cios22017
Miok Song, Yongjin Cho
{"title":"A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study of Stratafix versus Standard-of-Care for Deep Tissue Closure in Orthopedic Surgery.","authors":"Miok Song, Yongjin Cho","doi":"10.4055/cios22017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Orthopedic deep surgical incisions require the approximation of 1 or multiple tissue layers. This prospective randomized controlled study aimed to assess the usefulness and effectiveness of a barbed suture technique (Stratafix symmetric PDS plus) versus the conventional interrupted knotted suture technique for deep tissue closure in orthopedic surgery by comparing deep fascia suture time, relative cost, and wound-related complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 254 patients with deep surgical incisions who underwent orthopedic surgery between October 1, 2020, and June 30, 2021, were recruited. Their general characteristics (age, sex, weight, height, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status score, total operation time, and length of deep incision) and factors related to deep incision wounds (suture type and number, wound closure time, and operation site outcomes) were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The general characteristics did not differ between the Stratafix and conventional groups. There were no between-group differences observed in total operation time or total anesthesia time. The wound suture times differed significantly. In the conventional group, the suture time per unit length was lower in the group with the length of deep incision under 20 cm but did not differ significantly for each wound size. In the Stratafix group, the suture time per unit length was lower in the group under 15 cm, with the shortest time observed for 10-14.9 cm, followed by 5.0-9.9 cm and the group under 5 cm. The conventional group developed 4 cases of superficial wound infection or surgical wound necrosis. One case of protruded suture tap occurred in the Stratafix group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The average suture time per unit length increased for lengths under 5 cm as barbed sutures required more time from the start of the first suture to finish of the last suture. There was no significant benefit for very short suture length. One barbed suture material allows a suture of approximately 10-12 cm; sutures beyond that require more time because the surgeon has to start again. The Stratafix group used less suture material than the conventional group.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11444938/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4055/cios22017","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Orthopedic deep surgical incisions require the approximation of 1 or multiple tissue layers. This prospective randomized controlled study aimed to assess the usefulness and effectiveness of a barbed suture technique (Stratafix symmetric PDS plus) versus the conventional interrupted knotted suture technique for deep tissue closure in orthopedic surgery by comparing deep fascia suture time, relative cost, and wound-related complications.

Methods: A total of 254 patients with deep surgical incisions who underwent orthopedic surgery between October 1, 2020, and June 30, 2021, were recruited. Their general characteristics (age, sex, weight, height, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status score, total operation time, and length of deep incision) and factors related to deep incision wounds (suture type and number, wound closure time, and operation site outcomes) were collected.

Results: The general characteristics did not differ between the Stratafix and conventional groups. There were no between-group differences observed in total operation time or total anesthesia time. The wound suture times differed significantly. In the conventional group, the suture time per unit length was lower in the group with the length of deep incision under 20 cm but did not differ significantly for each wound size. In the Stratafix group, the suture time per unit length was lower in the group under 15 cm, with the shortest time observed for 10-14.9 cm, followed by 5.0-9.9 cm and the group under 5 cm. The conventional group developed 4 cases of superficial wound infection or surgical wound necrosis. One case of protruded suture tap occurred in the Stratafix group.

Conclusions: The average suture time per unit length increased for lengths under 5 cm as barbed sutures required more time from the start of the first suture to finish of the last suture. There was no significant benefit for very short suture length. One barbed suture material allows a suture of approximately 10-12 cm; sutures beyond that require more time because the surgeon has to start again. The Stratafix group used less suture material than the conventional group.

在矫形外科深层组织缝合方面,Stratafix 与标准护理的前瞻性随机对照研究。
背景:骨科深部手术切口需要接近一个或多个组织层。这项前瞻性随机对照研究旨在通过比较深筋膜缝合时间、相对成本和伤口相关并发症,评估带刺缝合技术(Stratafix symmetric PDS plus)与传统间断打结缝合技术在骨科手术深层组织缝合中的实用性和有效性:方法:共招募了 254 名在 2020 年 10 月 1 日至 2021 年 6 月 30 日期间接受骨科手术的深部手术切口患者。收集他们的一般特征(年龄、性别、体重、身高、体重指数、美国麻醉医师协会身体状况评分、手术总时间和深切口长度)和与深切口伤口相关的因素(缝合类型和数量、伤口闭合时间和手术部位结果):Stratafix组和传统组的总体特征没有差异。总手术时间和总麻醉时间在组间无差异。伤口缝合时间差异显著。在传统组中,深度切口长度在 20 厘米以下组的单位长度缝合时间较短,但在每种伤口大小上没有明显差异。在 Stratafix 组中,15 厘米以下组的单位长度缝合时间较短,10-14.9 厘米的缝合时间最短,其次是 5.0-9.9 厘米和 5 厘米以下组。常规组出现了 4 例浅表伤口感染或手术伤口坏死。结论:结论:5 厘米以下长度的单位长度平均缝合时间增加,因为倒钩缝合从开始缝合第一针到完成最后一针需要更多时间。极短的缝合长度没有明显优势。一种带倒刺的缝合材料可缝合约 10-12 厘米;超过这一长度的缝合需要更多时间,因为外科医生必须重新开始。Stratafix 组比传统组使用的缝合材料更少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信