Comparison of Khoury's Bone Shell Technique vs Titanium-reinforced Polytetrafluoroethylene Membrane for 3D-bone Augmentation in Atrophic Posterior Mandible: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Q3 Dentistry
Ahmed Es Shaker, Ahmed S Salem, Shaimaa Aa El-Farag, Fakhreldin H Abdel-Rahman, Mohamed H El-Kenawy
{"title":"Comparison of Khoury's Bone Shell Technique vs Titanium-reinforced Polytetrafluoroethylene Membrane for 3D-bone Augmentation in Atrophic Posterior Mandible: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Ahmed Es Shaker, Ahmed S Salem, Shaimaa Aa El-Farag, Fakhreldin H Abdel-Rahman, Mohamed H El-Kenawy","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study was designed to compare between the use of Khoury's bone shell technique vs titanium-reinforced PTFE membrane for 3D-ridge augmentation of atrophic posterior mandible.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Sixteen patients were equally and randomly assigned to either the Khoury or PTFE group. In Khoury group, a mandibular bone block was harvested, split and then fixed to augment the mandibular defect using osteosynthesis screws. In PTFE group, augmentation was achieved using Titanium-reinforced PTFE membranes fixed with bone tacks/screws. A mixture of autogenous and xenogenic graft material at a 1:1 ratio was used in both groups. Vertical and horizontal bone gain were obtained using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Preoperative dimensions were compared with the final dimensions obtained 6 months postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant complications or neurosensory dysfunction were encountered. A solitary patient in the Khoury group experienced limited wound dehiscence, which was treated conservatively. For both groups, there were no significant differences between preoperative and postoperative vertical (<i>p</i> = 0.849 and 0.569) and horizontal (<i>p</i> = 0.778 and 0.367) dimensions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No significant differences exist between the augmentation dimension which can be obtained using either Khoury of Ti-PTFE membranes.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Both approaches are delicate and necessitate surgical expertise and experience. Both techniques can be used to achieve predictable augmentation results with a low rate of complications. How to cite this article: Shaker AES, Salem AS, El-Farag SAA, et al. Comparison of Khoury's Bone Shell Technique vs Titanium-reinforced Polytetrafluoroethylene Membrane for 3D-bone Augmentation in Atrophic Posterior Mandible: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(6):518-526.</p>","PeriodicalId":35792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","volume":"25 6","pages":"518-526"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3704","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study was designed to compare between the use of Khoury's bone shell technique vs titanium-reinforced PTFE membrane for 3D-ridge augmentation of atrophic posterior mandible.

Materials and methods: Sixteen patients were equally and randomly assigned to either the Khoury or PTFE group. In Khoury group, a mandibular bone block was harvested, split and then fixed to augment the mandibular defect using osteosynthesis screws. In PTFE group, augmentation was achieved using Titanium-reinforced PTFE membranes fixed with bone tacks/screws. A mixture of autogenous and xenogenic graft material at a 1:1 ratio was used in both groups. Vertical and horizontal bone gain were obtained using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Preoperative dimensions were compared with the final dimensions obtained 6 months postoperatively.

Results: No significant complications or neurosensory dysfunction were encountered. A solitary patient in the Khoury group experienced limited wound dehiscence, which was treated conservatively. For both groups, there were no significant differences between preoperative and postoperative vertical (p = 0.849 and 0.569) and horizontal (p = 0.778 and 0.367) dimensions.

Conclusion: No significant differences exist between the augmentation dimension which can be obtained using either Khoury of Ti-PTFE membranes.

Clinical significance: Both approaches are delicate and necessitate surgical expertise and experience. Both techniques can be used to achieve predictable augmentation results with a low rate of complications. How to cite this article: Shaker AES, Salem AS, El-Farag SAA, et al. Comparison of Khoury's Bone Shell Technique vs Titanium-reinforced Polytetrafluoroethylene Membrane for 3D-bone Augmentation in Atrophic Posterior Mandible: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(6):518-526.

Khoury骨壳技术与钛增强聚四氟乙烯膜在萎缩的下颌骨后方进行三维骨增量的比较:随机临床试验。
目的:本研究旨在比较使用Khoury骨壳技术和钛增强聚四氟乙烯膜对萎缩的后下颌骨进行三维嵴增量手术的效果:16名患者被随机分配到Khoury组或PTFE组。在 Khoury 组,采集下颌骨骨块,分割后使用骨合成螺钉固定以增加下颌骨缺损。在聚四氟乙烯组,则使用钛增强聚四氟乙烯膜,并用骨钉/螺钉固定,以达到增量的目的。两组均按 1:1 的比例混合使用自体和异种移植材料。使用锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)获得垂直和水平骨增量。将术前尺寸与术后 6 个月获得的最终尺寸进行比较:结果:没有出现明显的并发症或神经感觉功能障碍。Khoury组有一名患者出现了局限性伤口裂开,但已采取保守治疗。两组患者术前和术后的垂直(p = 0.849 和 0.569)和水平(p = 0.778 和 0.367)尺寸无明显差异:结论:使用Khoury膜或Ti-PTFE膜所获得的隆胸尺寸没有明显差异:临床意义:这两种方法都很精细,需要专业的手术知识和经验。临床意义: 两种方法都很精细,需要专业的手术知识和经验,但两种技术都能达到可预测的隆胸效果,并发症发生率较低。如何引用本文:Shaker AES, Salem AS, El-Farag SAA, et al:随机临床试验。J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(6):518-526.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice
Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice (JCDP), is a peer-reviewed, open access MEDLINE indexed journal. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.thejcdp.com. The journal allows free access (open access) to its contents. Articles with clinical relevance will be given preference for publication. The Journal publishes original research papers, review articles, rare and novel case reports, and clinical techniques. Manuscripts are invited from all specialties of dentistry i.e., conservative dentistry and endodontics, dentofacial orthopedics and orthodontics, oral medicine and radiology, oral pathology, oral surgery, orodental diseases, pediatric dentistry, implantology, periodontics, clinical aspects of public health dentistry, and prosthodontics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信