Development, study, and comparison of models of cross-immunity to the influenza virus using statistical methods and machine learning.

Q3 Medicine
M N Asatryan, I S Shmyr, B I Timofeev, D N Shcherbinin, V G Agasaryan, T A Timofeeva, I F Ershov, E R Gerasimuk, A V Nozdracheva, T A Semenenko, D Y Logunov, A L Gintsburg
{"title":"Development, study, and comparison of models of cross-immunity to the influenza virus using statistical methods and machine learning.","authors":"M N Asatryan, I S Shmyr, B I Timofeev, D N Shcherbinin, V G Agasaryan, T A Timofeeva, I F Ershov, E R Gerasimuk, A V Nozdracheva, T A Semenenko, D Y Logunov, A L Gintsburg","doi":"10.36233/0507-4088-250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The World Health Organization considers the values of antibody titers in the hemagglutination inhibition assay as one of the most important criteria for assessing successful vaccination. Mathematical modeling of cross-immunity allows for identification on a real-time basis of new antigenic variants, which is of paramount importance for human health.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study uses statistical methods and machine learning techniques from simple to complex: logistic regression model, random forest method, and gradient boosting. The calculations used the AAindex matrices in parallel to the Hamming distance. The calculations were carried out with different types and values of antigenic escape thresholds, on four data sets. The results were compared using common binary classification metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differentiation is shown depending on the data sets used. The best results were demonstrated by all three models for the forecast autumn season of 2022, which were preliminary trained on the February season of the same year (Auroc 0.934; 0.958; 0.956, respectively). The lowest results were obtained for the entire forecast year 2023, they were set up on data from two seasons of 2022 (Aucroc 0.614; 0.658; 0.775). The dependence of the results on the types of thresholds used and their values turned out to be insignificant. The additional use of AAindex matrices did not significantly improve the results of the models without introducing significant deterioration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>More complex models show better results. When developing cross-immunity models, testing on a variety of data sets is important to make strong claims about their prognostic robustness.</p>","PeriodicalId":23669,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy virusologii","volume":"69 4","pages":"349-362"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Voprosy virusologii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36233/0507-4088-250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The World Health Organization considers the values of antibody titers in the hemagglutination inhibition assay as one of the most important criteria for assessing successful vaccination. Mathematical modeling of cross-immunity allows for identification on a real-time basis of new antigenic variants, which is of paramount importance for human health.

Materials and methods: This study uses statistical methods and machine learning techniques from simple to complex: logistic regression model, random forest method, and gradient boosting. The calculations used the AAindex matrices in parallel to the Hamming distance. The calculations were carried out with different types and values of antigenic escape thresholds, on four data sets. The results were compared using common binary classification metrics.

Results: Significant differentiation is shown depending on the data sets used. The best results were demonstrated by all three models for the forecast autumn season of 2022, which were preliminary trained on the February season of the same year (Auroc 0.934; 0.958; 0.956, respectively). The lowest results were obtained for the entire forecast year 2023, they were set up on data from two seasons of 2022 (Aucroc 0.614; 0.658; 0.775). The dependence of the results on the types of thresholds used and their values turned out to be insignificant. The additional use of AAindex matrices did not significantly improve the results of the models without introducing significant deterioration.

Conclusion: More complex models show better results. When developing cross-immunity models, testing on a variety of data sets is important to make strong claims about their prognostic robustness.

利用统计方法和机器学习,开发、研究和比较流感病毒交叉免疫模型。
导言:世界卫生组织认为血凝抑制试验中的抗体滴度值是评估疫苗接种成功与否的最重要标准之一。交叉免疫的数学模型可以实时识别新的抗原变体,这对人类健康至关重要:本研究使用了从简单到复杂的统计方法和机器学习技术:逻辑回归模型、随机森林法和梯度提升法。计算中使用了与汉明距离平行的 AAindex 矩阵。在四个数据集上使用不同类型和不同值的抗原逸出阈值进行了计算。使用常见的二元分类指标对结果进行了比较:结果:根据所使用的数据集,结果显示出显著的差异。在 2022 年秋季预测季节,所有三个模型都取得了最好的结果(分别为 Auroc 0.934;0.958;0.956)。2023 年整个预测年的结果最低,它们是根据 2022 年两个季节的数据建立的(Aucroc 0.614;0.658;0.775)。结果与所使用的阈值类型及其值的关系并不明显。额外使用 AAindex 矩阵并没有明显改善模型的结果,也没有带来明显的恶化:结论:更复杂的模型显示出更好的结果。在开发交叉免疫模型时,对各种数据集进行测试对其预后稳健性提出有力的主张非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Voprosy virusologii
Voprosy virusologii Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: The journal deals with advances in virology in Russia and abroad. It publishes papers dealing with investigations of viral diseases of man, animals and plants, the results of experimental research on different problems of general and special virology. The journal publishes materials are which promote introduction into practice of the achievements of the virological science in the eradication and incidence reduction of infectious diseases, as well as their diagnosis, treatment and prevention. The reader will find a description of new methods of investigation, new apparatus and devices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信