Nicholas R Lenze, Jayden Garcia, Punithavathy Vijayakumar, Sonja G Schütz, Michael J Brenner, Jeffrey J Stanley, Paul T Hoff
{"title":"Implementing a Streamlined Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulator Pathway: Cost, Time to Surgery, and Outcomes.","authors":"Nicholas R Lenze, Jayden Garcia, Punithavathy Vijayakumar, Sonja G Schütz, Michael J Brenner, Jeffrey J Stanley, Paul T Hoff","doi":"10.1002/oto2.70007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the costs, time to surgery, and clinical outcomes associated with implementing a streamlined hypoglossal nerve stimulator (HGNS) implantation pathway.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single tertiary care center in the United States from 2016 to 2023.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with a lack of complete concentric collapse of the velum during volitional snore on in-office laryngoscopy qualified for the streamlined HGNS pathway. This pathway consisted of confirmatory drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) followed immediately by HGNS implantation during the same surgical encounter. Outcomes were compared to patients in the traditional pathway (standalone DISE followed by HGNS implantation on a later date).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 68 patients (13 streamlined, 55 traditional) with obstructive sleep apnea who underwent HGNS implantation were included. Patients were predominately male (70.6%) and White (95.6%) and had a mean (SD) age of 63.5 (10.0) years. The streamlined pathway was associated with a significant reduction in both hospital costs (mean difference $9258, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3690-14,825; <i>P</i> = .002) and time to surgery (mean decrease of 3.82 months, 95% CI: 0.83-6.80 months; <i>P</i> = .013) compared to the traditional pathway. Patients in both groups had reduction in apnea-hypopnea index and Epworth Sleepiness Scale score, with no significant differences in comparisons between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In select patients, the streamlined HGNS pathway may expedite time to surgery and reduce hospital costs with comparable clinical outcomes to a traditional 2-stage pathway. Further research is warranted to validate patient selection and better understand longitudinal outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19697,"journal":{"name":"OTO Open","volume":"8 4","pages":"e70007"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11447855/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OTO Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/oto2.70007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the costs, time to surgery, and clinical outcomes associated with implementing a streamlined hypoglossal nerve stimulator (HGNS) implantation pathway.
Study design: Retrospective cohort study.
Setting: Single tertiary care center in the United States from 2016 to 2023.
Methods: Patients with a lack of complete concentric collapse of the velum during volitional snore on in-office laryngoscopy qualified for the streamlined HGNS pathway. This pathway consisted of confirmatory drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) followed immediately by HGNS implantation during the same surgical encounter. Outcomes were compared to patients in the traditional pathway (standalone DISE followed by HGNS implantation on a later date).
Results: A total of 68 patients (13 streamlined, 55 traditional) with obstructive sleep apnea who underwent HGNS implantation were included. Patients were predominately male (70.6%) and White (95.6%) and had a mean (SD) age of 63.5 (10.0) years. The streamlined pathway was associated with a significant reduction in both hospital costs (mean difference $9258, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3690-14,825; P = .002) and time to surgery (mean decrease of 3.82 months, 95% CI: 0.83-6.80 months; P = .013) compared to the traditional pathway. Patients in both groups had reduction in apnea-hypopnea index and Epworth Sleepiness Scale score, with no significant differences in comparisons between groups.
Conclusion: In select patients, the streamlined HGNS pathway may expedite time to surgery and reduce hospital costs with comparable clinical outcomes to a traditional 2-stage pathway. Further research is warranted to validate patient selection and better understand longitudinal outcomes.